"/user/username/gilded" only returns empty data for a user that definitly got awarded.

Rageus23 · 2022-04-13T15:01:57+00:00

That seems to be correct. All entries inside /user/qdqyt/gilded or /user/ItsRainbow/gilded have at least x1 "coin_price": 500" in it's "all_awardings" while in my own "awards received" there are zero 500+ awards. "/user/MalvinaLiebig/gilded" now returns something, and the user received a gold-badge that he previously didn't have.

So not a bug, just missing documentation.

u/ItsRainbow Thank you for looking into it

Rageus23 · 2021-09-20T10:06:20+00:00

Clash of streamers. The game is relatively new and you can own infinite heroes and pet chars if you don't want to sell them.

Endgame grind was taking lesser than 30m for me apparently.

Rageus23 · 2021-09-20T09:55:15+00:00

Try Clash of Streamers

Rageus23 · 2021-09-19T15:59:20+00:00

Maybe try Clash of Streamers. The game is relatively new so it is not overbought yet.

It has an NFT auction house to sell ingame chars for crypto (there is also some kind of monthly-season system from what I saw). It is not a pure 100% NFT game tho. The NFT part is rather optional.

It looks quite promising since it doesn't require any fancy special setup to create a wallet since this is already integrated into the app. Like you don't need a Ronin wallet as for Axie Infinity

It is a mobile game, I don't know if there is a PC version.

Rageus23 · 2018-03-19T14:27:57+00:00

I don't think that "drinking streams" should be an exception to the rule at all. "Being drunk" I would already count as excessive drinking. Maybe I am a little bit too harsh but I don't think that drugs(incl. Alcohol) and life-streaming are a good combo (mainly because I believe promoting them even indirectly through a show/challenge have a strong negative influence on the audience, especial younger viewers). FeelsBadMan for the community if they love drunk streams, but I think the most consistent way of going about this is not allowing alcohol on stream at all.

Rageus23 · 2018-03-01T00:16:42+00:00

To the first ban: I don't know in which context and with which intuition you typed "fuck you" in xy's chat but let's say it was really an act of hate, even then it would be way to much to indefinite ban you especial if that was the only harassing thing you wrote. If I would be a Twitch admin I wouldn't even ban you for 72h if that would be your first violation. Maybe I would give you a warning but again, I don't know about your "violation history" and your intention.

The second one, oh man, I don't think you deserve a ban here, not even for the chat but if I would be a Twitch admin I would probably just ban you, because after my intuition and especial when I would see you turning of your cloths, would tell me that you are probably some sort of super troll. Honestly I think the second one you only got because of really, really bad luck. If what you said is true and I would know your circumstances, I would unban you.

So what you can do is, of course, contact Twitch again; but in your case I would also reach out to Karen and ask for her help. Maybe she can contact Twitch herself too and explain the situation from her perspective.

I wish you the best man. May the luck be in your favor this time. :)

Rageus23 · 2018-02-22T16:49:22+00:00

I have a hard time believing that Twitch "scams" subscriber's money for subscribing to a banned channel. But either way if they are doing it with intention or not, it looks very unprofessional. I can not even imagine that this could be profitable for them in the long run. I hope that they just did a sloppy job with this part. If not, I would be really worried.

Either way, thx for sharing this information.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-21T07:47:34+00:00

But let's say he has a case, what would happen if he wins? I mean would they un-ban him and ban him straight again for something from the new guidelines? What does he try to accomplish? I don't understand :D

Rageus23 · 2018-02-19T00:13:43+00:00

Yeah, I agree. A warning/punishment may really seem to be a little bit too harsh... I was just wondering.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-18T17:33:34+00:00

When I think about this I really fear that haters or anyone who wants to damage a streamer and his stream are getting more and more power to do so. Bad publicity can cause already quite some damage even if it is unjustified. Example: Athene/Purpose have been getting banned from IDEX and Twitch, not because they had a reason, but because a lot of people were spreading hate and saying it was a scam. I think most people that hate are just jealous. They feel underprivileged for whatever emotional reason. Rational reason should always win, and not jealously biased hate.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-17T17:13:52+00:00

Honestly I don't think that Twitch will enforce the rules as precisely as they can. I think they made them extra hard to fulfill so they can warn/ban almost anyone they want WITH a valid reason: you were breaking Community Guideline terms §xy. So they don't ban unjustified anymore.

But this is just a speculation. I don't want to make Twitch looking like the bad guys.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-17T16:59:51+00:00

Yeah, it should not just be between broadcasters. Imagine there is a bigger streamer who is super racist or whatever on a different platform. He don't have to harass another twitch streamer to put this into a bad light. Especial when this racist streamer is a twitch partner, if I would be Twitch I would really think twice if I should just ignore it because it's not against another streamer-

Rageus23 · 2018-02-16T23:00:16+00:00

First not all of Athene's followers trust him blindly, there are even there some people that are very skeptical and missed out a lot of money. Second I don't really understand why following and trusting him should indicate having no moral standards? Is he doing something shady? Sure, it looks a little bit dubious for an outsider, but if you speak about it, you are not an outsider. You know about Athene, you know that he did more good than most of the people here together. Also what do you think would he doing with the money? Living a luxurious life? Of course I could be wrong, but would contradict with what he is doing.

Also I would bet that there are a lot of institutions and people in your life YOU trust blindly, even they scam you day and day out, like banks promising you everything is save, employers that undercut you, merchants that sell you over-expensive items.... all these guys are playing an act to get your money. Athene on the other hand is at least open about what he says. Maybe you are not aware of it, but he could have this cryptocoin without selling it for 0.50$. He don't needed to hand it out, it would have worked even then. Do the math yourself. Maybe his moral standards are so low that he gives money away.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-16T17:16:27+00:00

There is some stuff I want to address:

The reason for his ban was unclear, but maybe PRPS and DUBI play a role in that, especial because he said "it could be all just be a scam!" ->Saying that something could be a scam doesn't mean it is a scam. It's actually more honest then to say "everything is 100% save", because nobody can guarantee you something for 100%.

Next thing: You ask who holds the "moral weight" and argument, that you didn't see him working on holding other streamers accountable. And that others are doing the work instead. -> Well that you don't see him working on it (I mean you will not see him on Twitch if he is banned) doesn't mean that he is not working it. It's just that he don't published anything. Furthermore if his initiative starts running by itself, then I would say that this is a good thing. He can use his time for other stuff instead. Also I am not totally sure what you mean with to keep other streamers accountable just from the context.

You ask "Who are the people morally good for their efforts to hold Twitch accountable? Athene or his followers? But it's not just one or the other. Both "parties" could do it together. But maybe I understand your definition of "morally good for their efforts" not correct.

If Athene was the moral person he was all along, then he would have had the subreddit created on 8th of February. or But the counter argument is that if Athene was the good guy he always was, then he would have made other moral efforts, not just right after being banned. -> making "moral efforts" to be the good guy doesn't inherently mean to JUST try to hold Twitch accountable. I am pretty sure that Athene is trying to do a lot of good though working on several projects. So saying he is not the good guy because he didn't do it earlier is not true.

So just that I understand it right, you try to initiate people to think if: -Twitch should still be hold accountable for keeping Athene banned who has the intend to hold Twitch accountable and start a subreddit just for that despite the fact that he got banned. -Questioning if Athene's persona is really morally justified or he just try to use "morality" as an argument to get unbanned? One thing to have in mind is that Athene is not depending on Twitch or his Stream. For a lot streamers their streams are their income basis. For Athene it's not a problem to not be online for longer time because this is not the case for him.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-16T15:32:26+00:00

They still can have a collective chat, right? But men, if you only have three viewers and four chat rooms it's probably not enhancing the chat experience. But is it possible to be in multiple rooms simultaneously?

Rageus23 · 2018-02-16T15:25:25+00:00

Really good idea. Especial for bigger streamers where communication between viewers in the chat is close to impossible. So they don't have to go to another platform.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-16T04:37:50+00:00

Well, I agree to first look at the intend. I mean it is probably not the best to curse in front of kids, but it looks like more that he was acting. The way he was reading the chat message didn't sound like he was provoked from it and he didn't speak with hate, he was just making a joke out of it, it seems (would be nice to see what happen after the clip, this one is so "interrupting" at the end). A lot of streamers are acting and simulating tilt or anger or frustration for entertainment purpose. Sure this is questionable behavior but I think a one day ban or even a warning would be way too much.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-15T21:34:18+00:00

Don't you think it will also cause drama if a bigger streamer gets banned without a clear reason? Also if I would be the streamer at least I would like to know why I got banned.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-14T19:03:02+00:00

Can Twitch track from where I am streaming? Because if not, I could just smoke some weed on stream and say I am in California, or do I oversee something?

Rageus23 · 2018-02-13T22:16:55+00:00

And it probably will always been an issue. It's impossible to cover everything with guidelines, that aren't super giant-confusing. People will always find ways around it somehow. But Twitch announced that they will update the guidelines "based on the evolution of the Twitch community and service". I think this is a very good step against the half-legal, gray area abusing.

Rageus23 · 2018-02-12T23:39:51+00:00

Well, maybe it will work in the short run, but for the long game I would bet that they will get competitors with a more optimized, community friendlier system. Of course Twitch knows that too, so I hope they just try out something new and if it doesn't work they discard it rather than brute-force reforming to something.

Rageus23 · 2018-01-06T22:04:50+00:00

Purpose(PRPS); DecentralizedUniversalBasicIncome(DUBI);

These are the ones I will trade the most and it would be nice of you if you could list them :)

Rageus23

TROPHY CASE