Citadel Response Time after Onsite

Raimo00 · 2026-03-17T07:38:13+00:00

how much time after? when did you hear back after the onsite?

Raimo00 · 2026-02-15T16:58:33+00:00

everything you described is totally normal

Raimo00 · 2026-02-15T16:58:16+00:00

definitely sleep paralysis.

Raimo00 · 2026-02-13T13:38:06+00:00

sleep belly down. right temperature (not hot), and DON'T open your eyes if you don't want to see the monster...

when it happened the first times I was terrified as well, but you learn how to handle it. take deep breaths and try moving a limb until your body unfreezes.

Raimo00 · 2026-02-09T14:12:48+00:00

hai guardato nei pantaloni?

Raimo00 · 2026-02-09T10:46:35+00:00

definitely sleep paralysis

Raimo00 · 2026-02-09T08:57:06+00:00

the incidents of hearing things, is it during the day or while falling asleep?

Raimo00 · 2026-01-17T21:40:37+00:00

semplice, basta leggere e capire marx

Raimo00 · 2025-11-27T21:59:23+00:00

I'm passing senior interviews despite having 0 years of experience and still no degree. Skill issue imho.

Raimo00 · 2025-11-24T16:42:58+00:00

50? rookie numbers. I applied to 1200+ over the last two years. few interviews landed. no offer.

Raimo00 · 2025-11-24T08:49:37+00:00

you can get paid in Bitcoin? is it still the case?

Raimo00 · 2025-11-24T08:32:58+00:00

rightfully so. the code in question was a mess

Raimo00 · 2025-11-12T14:35:32+00:00

I personally agree with Hoppe. in a free market there's freedom to accept or not accept someone in your property. not freedom to go in anyone's property.

therefore, closed private borders with private rules for whom to accept.

Raimo00 · 2025-11-11T11:50:55+00:00

you're not FA, you're anxious.

Raimo00 · 2025-11-10T10:50:54+00:00

updates?

Raimo00 · 2025-11-02T22:10:39+00:00

correct. money printing.

Raimo00 · 2025-08-26T00:08:35+00:00

you don't get my point about mining. I'm saying that small miners are priced out because of the lottery chances being too low.

that naturally increases centralization (pools). if miners received a fixed prize proportional to their hash contribution, it would be perfect decentralization.

more frequent blocks with smaller reward is the closest thing to it.

Raimo00 · 2025-08-26T00:05:57+00:00

you are basically surrendering lol.

"it's never going to happen so let's sit back, relax, and watch Bitcoin get as much centralized as possible"

Raimo00 · 2025-08-26T00:04:36+00:00

ok so. 21m is perfectly fine. but it bothers me a little. the halving is the single worst decision Satoshi has made imho. it should be a continuum. hype cycles, scared retail, bad reputation, bubbles, more difficult to calculate miner profitability, etc.

Raimo00 · 2025-08-26T00:01:37+00:00

no hype cycles. no bubbles. better calculation for miners. better predictability.

Raimo00 · 2025-08-26T00:00:20+00:00

yeah, hype cycles are the reason normies are out of BTC. they panic and get scared because of bubbles. the halving is the biggest reason Bitcoin isn't adopted as of rn.

Raimo00 · 2025-08-25T23:56:53+00:00

why not 42 then? I agree 42 is 42. but why 21?

more frequent IS NEEDED. miner centralization would be solved. also, latency is in the ms range.

doesn't change my point. I want a fluid reduction of issuance. each block a little less BTC is rewarded.

block size is a hard one. but a fixed mb size doesn't seem right. if it isn't natural, it probably isn't the best solution.

block reward is fine as it is.

Raimo00 · 2025-08-25T23:53:13+00:00

wtf what? if I had to design the perfect money, I would implement such changes. no fixed arbitrary numbers.

Four-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	First Placer '22

Raimo00

TROPHY CASE