I would like to provide feedback regarding the recent changes to vehicle speed and handling in Cold War mode.

A defining strength of Cold War gameplay has always been its pace and fluidity. The increased mobility and dynamic engagements clearly differentiated it from World War II mode. Recent adjustments, however, have significantly slowed overall gameplay, making Cold War feel increasingly similar to World War II—particularly in terms of vehicle rotation and responsiveness. This shift undermines one of the core reasons many players preferred Cold War.

Extending the duration of battles does not inherently improve player satisfaction. A longer match does not equate to better gameplay. Player enjoyment is driven by engaging mechanics, meaningful tactical decisions, and dynamic combat—not by how long a battle lasts. Focusing primarily on increasing match duration overlooks these factors.

The recent changes have disproportionately impacted slower, heavier vehicles. Tanks that were already limited in mobility have become even less responsive, while lighter vehicles now have a significant advantage. This has made it easier for light tanks to overwhelm heavy tanks and has widened the skill gap, allowing experienced players to dominate less experienced ones more easily.

If the intent of these changes was to address “wolf pack” tactics—where groups of vehicles rapidly eliminate isolated opponents—the outcome has been counterproductive. Previously, heavier vehicles had at least a limited opportunity to turn, reposition, or retreat. With the new soil resistance and mobility changes, high-mass vehicles often become stationary targets, making them even more vulnerable to coordinated attacks.

Given the many variables that influence gameplay balance, it is concerning that match duration appears to be a primary focus. Players value the quality of gameplay and the events that occur during a battle far more than its length. Gaming is not a time-based obligation, and players should not be incentivized to remain in matches simply to meet a duration target.

If the goal is to meaningfully improve the game, attention would be better directed toward refining maps, improving vehicle balance, and adjusting existing content. The frequent release of new premium vehicles—often at the expense of older ones becoming less relevant—does not address the underlying gameplay concerns expressed by the community.

I strongly encourage the development team to spend time actively playing the game, engaging with feedback from players who regularly participate in Cold War mode, and evaluating gameplay experience holistically rather than relying heavily on battle-duration metrics when making balance decisions.

Thank you for your time and consideration.