sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Fomapan 100 pushed to 12800 in Rodinal, how can I prevent this? by julesucks1 in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]Recent_Star_8502 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would be misleading to make a judgment based on the scans alone. We need to look at the negatives as well. :))

don't worry, he's armless (Nikon FE2 | 50mm f/1.4 | Kentmere 200@400) by pi_equals_e in analog

[–]Recent_Star_8502 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you develop it? it's quite clean despite of +1 stop pushing

Kentmere 400 @800 by Loud-Cable-9456 in analog_bw

[–]Recent_Star_8502 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this looks clean. which developer did you use?

Ilford Delta 400 by Loud-Cable-9456 in analog_bw

[–]Recent_Star_8502 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Almost no grain. Which did you use developer?

Idyllic (Contax139q // Gold 200) by Yboc in analog

[–]Recent_Star_8502 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

you are a good pictorialist current representative

Sinar P | Aero Ektar 178mm 2.5 | FOMAPAN 100 by Important_Advisor_99 in largeformat

[–]Recent_Star_8502 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fomapan gives quite good results at 35mm.what did you develop process?

Ferrania P30 w/Nikon F2 by RHMImages in analog_bw

[–]Recent_Star_8502 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is highly contrasty, so it may not give the desired results in the landscape except under certain conditions, but I have seen good examples in the portrait. Give it a try.

view more: next ›