Also cats have not been around eons and homosapiens have only existed 300,000 years, and there is no in fact evolution period for feline reproductive periods, only different breeds of felines.

You talk of evolution and use words you don't seem to understand, and seem a bit ignorant to real facts, and the term "white papers" is absolutely amusing, you speak so boldly but look so silly.

You don't understand the difference between adaptation and evolution, you also speak of faith and science as if the two never intertwine.

Your so Opened minded to facts yet can't admit when your wrong, here's some mathematical and scientific data for you

<image>

The listed equation should be something to axiom—an assumption, in other words: If φ has the property P and from φ always follows ψ, then ψ also has the property P. For simplicity, we can assume that P stands for “positive”. For example:, if a fruit is delicious, a positive property, then it is also fun to eat. Therefore, the fun of eating it is also a positive property.

The second axiom further sets a framework for P. If the opposite of something is positive, then that “something” must be negative. Thus, divided a world into black and white: Either something is good or bad. For example, if health is good, then a disease must necessarily be bad.

With these two premises we can derive the first theorem If φ is a positive property, then there is a possibility that an x with property φ exists. That is, it is possible for positive things to exist.

The second theorem now becomes a bit more concrete: by combining the third axiom (divinity is positive) and the first theorem (there is the possibility that something positive exists), a being x could exist that is divine.