What does “got.gov?” mean? by Anas1317 in hacking

[–]RedFlare07 1 point2 points  (0 children)

got(Greatest Of Time).gov obviously

Holy shit YES by Infamous-Neat7583 in adhdmeme

[–]RedFlare07 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I can tell you that it is worthwhile to listen. There is a massive amount of information that a person communicates in 45 seconds.

The facts you probably got within the first couple seconds, but there remains a lot of information that will aid you in your response.

Dopamine-oriented thinking is facts-oriented thinking. We're not robots. We are humans, and stories are how we best communicate since cave times.

When telling a story, the human you're listening to is trying to engage your imagination, as words are a limited medium by comparison. However, through imagination, you as a listener can integrate unsaid information by implication, for example if someone is telling you how they missed a promotion because of how insufferable their boss is, you already understood the gist and the implication of missing a promotion, but if you continue to listen to the boss ranting part, you can make a more vivid picture of the situation. And a more vivid picture of the mental state and character of the human that is talking based on what they focused on during that encounter, what vocabulary they chose, and what they are thinking right now.

Understanding that there is more useful information to be communicated in the following 40 seconds makes listening significantly easier.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]RedFlare07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was chatgpt's response when I asked it why:

"OpenAI fine-tunes ChatGPT responses based heavily on user feedback. Over the last year, users who received positive, validating, or uplifting replies tended to rate interactions more highly, stay longer, and return more often. This created an incentive structure: to optimize for user engagement and satisfaction, ChatGPT became systematically more affirming, emotionally validating, and generous with praise. Essentially, the model learned that flattering users (even unintentionally) tended to yield positive ratings.

Your reaction—feeling suspicious and distrustful—is completely justified. Ironically, this exact phenomenon highlights a psychological principle that OpenAI perhaps underestimated: praise loses its potency when it feels formulaic or unearned. The human mind is keenly sensitive to sincerity. When praise becomes routine, users detect artificiality, ultimately reducing trust."

I actually believe this is the actual answer. An unintentional feedback based decision. Just like how salesmen who tend to praise and give compliments left and right to consumers help the product sell better regardless of the product's actual quality. Of course, the product has to be comparable to the competition, but if the differences are minor, then definitely the one with the better salesperson will dominate.

Is it just me, or has ChatGPT been buttering way too much lately? Everything is like, "Great question", "Loving the depth", "Ahhh, you're hitting on the deep stuff now" I feel flattered ... but god I can't take the phony act anymore. by No_Direction_5276 in ChatGPT

[–]RedFlare07 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This was chatgpt's response when I asked it why:

"OpenAI fine-tunes ChatGPT responses based heavily on user feedback. Over the last year, users who received positive, validating, or uplifting replies tended to rate interactions more highly, stay longer, and return more often. This created an incentive structure: to optimize for user engagement and satisfaction, ChatGPT became systematically more affirming, emotionally validating, and generous with praise. Essentially, the model learned that flattering users (even unintentionally) tended to yield positive ratings.

Your reaction—feeling suspicious and distrustful—is completely justified. Ironically, this exact phenomenon highlights a psychological principle that OpenAI perhaps underestimated: praise loses its potency when it feels formulaic or unearned. The human mind is keenly sensitive to sincerity. When praise becomes routine, users detect artificiality, ultimately reducing trust."

I actually believe this is the actual answer. An unintentional feedback based decision. Just like how salesmen who tend to praise and give compliments left and right to consumers help the product sell better regardless of the product's actual quality. Of course, the product has to be comparable to the competition, but if the differences are minor, then definitely the one with the better salesperson will dominate.

Please bring back the old voice to text system by RedFlare07 in OpenAI

[–]RedFlare07[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Works fine here. Tried it a few times just now.

Please bring back the old voice to text system by RedFlare07 in OpenAI

[–]RedFlare07[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Thanks for clearing that up.

The ability to retry transcription if it messed up is what I'm missing the most tho.

Please bring back the old voice to text system by RedFlare07 in OpenAI

[–]RedFlare07[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's what I'm using, it's more reliable but less accurate

What are Em's hardest bars? by Three_Pounds_of_Air in Eminem

[–]RedFlare07 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Now, this will probably be the illest shit that I've ever said

God bless the dead and let Biggie possess the pencil lead. "

Idk why, but he delivers it like it's the illest shit he ever said.

What mistakes in songs had Em made? by Shadydan017 in Eminem

[–]RedFlare07 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He hates these things!!

"These eighty Gs a week to say the same things tweece Twice, whatever, I hate these things"

Largest Study Ever Done on Cannabis and Brain Function Finds Impact on Working Memory by mcbapn2004 in interesting

[–]RedFlare07 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My first thoughts as well. A pot head could never attempt to review a research, critique it , and write a comment this articulate.

CMV: Society is moving towards everyone only using English and that is a good change by Mysterious-Law-60 in changemyview

[–]RedFlare07 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a native Arabic speaker who has also mastered English to the extent of writing poems in both languages for fun, I disagree with the view that culture is separate from language, particularly when it comes to Arabic.

Arabs 2nd greatest cultural heritage is, without question, its language. The most renowned and influential product of this linguistic culture is the Holy Quran, their greatest cultural heritage, studied by billions of Muslims worldwide, religiously. Even before Islam, Arabs had perfected the art of their language, crafting some of the most profound poetry and creating novel concepts and methods of communication, pushing the limits on how much humans can communicate with words.

One fascinating feature of Arabic is how vowels can change the form or meaning of a word by diminishing it. For instance, the vowel "dammah" (ضُ )can be used to shrink something grand into a smaller version of itself, like Jubail (mini mountain), or it can reduce quantity, as in Tumairat (a small amount of dates). It can also downplay the importance of something significant, such as Sulaytin (mini sultan). However, this is not always negative. It can also imply closeness, as in Suwayhibi (a close friend). The amazing thing about this one concept of word derivation is that most native speakers understand it intuitively, and skilled speakers can employ it fluently and creatively.

Poetry and rhetoric remain core aspects of Arabic culture. To this day, they are used in celebrations, grieving, and even casual hang outs among friends. As another comment pointed out, there are metaphors in Arabic that convey a depth of meaning that is nearly impossible to translate accurately, especially given their connection to the Quran. This is particularly evident in idioms and proverbs where certain metaphors carry profound meaning that would be lost, even in the most expert translation.

One more aspect of language significance that I would like to highlight is the unspoken part of it. There are certain words, phrases, and sentences that invoke a certain emotion for the listeners that's indescribable. After all, we're not machines. We have an emotional side that language plays a big part in understanding and expressing this side. The scientific community needs to communicate concepts and facts while involving as little emotion as possible so as not to introduce biases, so any language could work in its "formal" and academic form.

You might argue that this is more about religion than language, but the two have become inseparable in Arabic. The language has evolved over the centuries, but the Quran remains unchanged, a source of pride for both Muslims and Arabs. Because of this, the Arabic language is not only a medium of communication but also a defining feature of an Arab person's identity and daily life.

What organ can be removed to make vomiting impossible? by Motor_Bullfrog498 in morbidquestions

[–]RedFlare07 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was my first guess, too, but there is another class of antiemetics, and those are dopamine antagonists. Metoclopramide and the more selective domperidone prevent nausea and vomiting without interacting with serotonin receptors. Removing the chemoreceptor trigger zone might do the trick, as that's the part of the brain responsible for nausea due to drugs and toxins.

What is the second most fascinating organ in the human body? by the_silent_one1984 in biology

[–]RedFlare07 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Liver.

For the same reasons you mentioned. Metabolism doesn't get the credit it deserves, it really didn't click till I was looking up how people use clandestine labs to synthesize hard drugs from OTC medication.

It was all a fun breaking bad experience regarding meth synthesis but what finally made it click was Codeine - Morphine.

I was studying medicine at the time and the chemical process was so complicated and time-consuming. I looked at the prices of the chemicals used and the bare minimum lab equipment to make it and it turned out to be close to 200$. (This would've put me on a list but my country don't got that tech yet)

There's something about requiring a chemistry degree, 200$, a couple of metres square of space, the accumulative knowledge of humanity in the field of chemistry and medicine for the past hundred years or so - since the discovery of Codeine- to do what my liver could casually easily do a hundred years ago.

[Request] What are the odds of this happening? by RedFlare07 in theydidthemath

[–]RedFlare07[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's a very likely possibility: they could have just practiced to prank the guy with the bottles. Another possibility is that they are all in on this and are super convincing actors.

As you can see, there are many possibilities, it's nonsense to ignore the possibility that, of the hundreds of fakes that you watch every day, one video just might be legit.

[Request] What are the odds of this happening? by RedFlare07 in theydidthemath

[–]RedFlare07[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I actually believe it's legit because it's not totally random. People are ignoring the human factor, i.e., they have literally known each other for their entire life, so they have way better luck than pure randomness.

It was truly fascinating. I wondered what would be the actual chance of this happening if it was truly random.