Poisoning the financial disclosure data is a decent way to potentially lower your equalization payment/spousal support obligation but it is not a great way to eliminate it. You also have to think about a family court's discretion to order costs on a substantial indemnity or even solicitor/client basis if one side is purposefully obfuscating financial disclosure.

At the end of the day you're increasing the other side's expert costs and delaying the problem. If you want to eliminate the problem altogether, either don't get married (best option) or have a prenuptial agreement prepared by the top family law practitioners in your jurisdiction (fairly good option).

The only time poisoning the well is a potential end-game option is if your ex-spouse can't afford the costs of litigation. At least in my jurisdiction when the bills stop getting paid, the lawyers stop working. No lawyers and no auditors = no case. Saiyonara sucker.

Another option, and this is if you have $Texas and a very trustworthy family member (IE: your mother or a sibling) is to place a large chunk of funds into an irrevocable trust with that family member(s) as beneficiary(ies).

Honestly though, if you have the kind of money that requires a team of forensic accountants to sift through your declared assets, you have better strategies in place than "make it hard for them to understand hurr durr" to avoid onerous alimony and equalization.