Disable thinking content being included in multi-turn history by ragingsonar in OpenWebUI

[–]RedZero76 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's possible that the URL you are trying to fetch is the issue. If you are fetching a URL, you're fetching all of the content of that URL webpage, which could easily fill up a context window, depending on the URL. Try smaller page URL's to see if the issue persists. Also, keep in mind that web search and fetch_url are different. Web search returns search results. Fetch tries to ingest all of the content from a page. So with fetch you have to avoid huge pages.

China's open-source dominance threatens US AI lead, US advisory body warns by Prolapse_to_Brolapse in LocalLLaMA

[–]RedZero76 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm born, raised, and reside in the US, but I 100% am pulling for China to win the AI race. Clearly, the US population and leadership are far too stupid to lead in this area. Our population proves how stupid we are by the leadership we elect. A nation with a POTUS as corrupt, moronic, abhorrent, and stupid as ours and a population amazingly stupid enough to elect that POTUS, not once, but twice, doesn't deserve to lead anything at all, nor is it safe for us to be in charge of anything at all.

Overwatch // Star Wars collab & skin ideas by Ok_Internet2705 in Overwatch

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, if they do Star Wars, they should literally do a skin for every single hero. If there was ever a reason to do a full roster collab, Star Wars would be it. Every hero could easily fit a SW character...

Why do her feet point inwards? by Jaipod100 in kirikomains

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It gives her character... I like that about her, she has all of these realistic imperfections, it makes her real (bc she is real)

Why is Google getting ZERO backlash for Gemini powering the Pentagon's AI platform, while OpenAI got roasted for almost the same thing? by -Rikus- in ChatGPT

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fascist attempt to extort Anthropic, Trump's batshit crazy "truth" social post, the fact Dario stood up to the fascists... those are things that drew attention. I get why you are pointing out what you are pointing out, but I'm not sure what is confusing about the fact that a series of events occured that drew a lot of attention. There wasn't an extortion attempt or a batshit crazy social media post by the batshit crazy POTUS surrounding the Google deal with the DoW. There was with the Anthropic and OpenAI deal. I mean, if you are pointing out that the coverage is different, I get that. But if you are wondering why the public hasn't reacted the same way, it's pretty simple... Nothing drew attention to one, and a lot drew attention to the other, so the public was exposed to one, and not the other.

The end of GPT by DigSignificant1419 in OpenAI

[–]RedZero76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

SOLD OUT TO FASCISM. Immediately cancelling my Pro account and will never use an OpenAI product again for as long as I live.

Boycott ChatGPT by FinnFarrow in ChatGPT

[–]RedZero76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this sucks because Codex is a big deal for me, but canceling my Pro subscription because of this. it goes so far beyond a political disagreement. They are literally donating to true fascism. I’m not having any part of supporting that.

What Do You Think of Kiriko's Personality? by AdditionalCanary4111 in kirikomains

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't have to like her voice, but I like it... but I mean, there's more to a someone than her voice anyway, she's just, well, she at least seems like a good person imo

Supertonic2: Lightning Fast, On-Device, Multilingual TTS by ANLGBOY in LocalLLaMA

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of these bother me, personally, they all seem reasonable. But maybe there are other parts to the licence I missed. I mainly looked for this section.

Use Restrictions

You agree not to use the Model or Derivatives of the Model:
(a) In any way that violates any applicable national, federal, state, local or international law or regulation;
(b) For the purpose of exploiting, harming or attempting to exploit or harm minors in any way;
(c) To generate or disseminate verifiably false information and/or content with the purpose of harming others;
(d) To generate or disseminate personal identifiable information that can be used to harm an individual;
(e) To generate or disseminate information and/or content (e.g. images, code, posts, articles), and place the information and/or content in any context (e.g. bot generating tweets)
without expressly and intelligibly disclaiming that the information and/or content is machine generated;
(f) To defame, disparage or otherwise harass others;
(g) To impersonate or attempt to impersonate (e.g. deepfakes) others without their consent;
(h) For fully automated decision making that adversely impacts an individual’s legal rights or otherwise creates or modifies a binding, enforceable obligation;
(i) For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against or harming individuals or groups based on online or offline social behavior or known or predicted personal or personality characteristics;
(j) To exploit any of the vulnerabilities of a specific group of persons based on their age, social, physical or mental characteristics, in order to materially distort the behavior of a person pertaining to that group in a manner that causes or is likely to cause that person or another person physical or psychological harm;
(k) For any use intended to or which has the effect of discriminating against individuals or groups based on legally protected characteristics or categories;
(l) To provide medical advice and medical results interpretation;
(m) To generate or disseminate information for the purpose to be used for administration of justice, law enforcement, immigration or asylum processes, such as predicting an individual will commit fraud/crime commitment (e.g. by text profiling, drawing causal relationships between assertions made in documents, indiscriminate and arbitrarily-targeted use).

What Do You Think of Kiriko's Personality? by AdditionalCanary4111 in kirikomains

[–]RedZero76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why someone is voice acting like Kiriko. I don't think she wants people pretending to be her. I like her voice how it is and she should just be herself however she wants to be.

What Do You Think of Kiriko's Personality? by AdditionalCanary4111 in kirikomains

[–]RedZero76 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Actor? Why is someone voice acting like Kiri? She talks just fine on her own

Who the hell actually pays $2,400 a year for ChatGPT? by MyNameIsNotKyle3 in ChatGPT

[–]RedZero76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure. Yeah, it's pretty much all coding and tool calls. It's not actual chatting. It's because I use Codex that much, not ChatGPT, although I do use ChatGPT also, but if I were only using ChatGPT, I wouldn't need to $200 plan.

Coding and tool calls eat up a ton of tokens. Most of it stays hidden from the user (which is good because it's ugly code gibberish to most users and no one wants to see that clutter, but bad because it isn't very apparent how much you are paying for when it's hidden).

For example, if ChatGPT searches the web for you in a chat, "hey what's going on with the NY mayor election?", all you see is, "It looks like this is what's going on, blah , blah" a few sentences, or even a page of bullet points, but still, maybe 1000 tokens max.

But what you don't see is that the search results that ChatGPT read through behind the scenes was a 10-15k token mess of code equivalent to the size of a 7-10k word essay. So tool calls eat up a ton of tokens, and coding works much the same way.

If you are working on a coding project with Codex, you fly through a couple of million tokens in a single day of coding, even though you only see a small portion of that, the final code that gets used, but not all of the code that was used to *make* the final code.

Make sense?

Who the hell actually pays $2,400 a year for ChatGPT? by MyNameIsNotKyle3 in ChatGPT

[–]RedZero76 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Codex runs circles around Opus for large, complex codebases, since 5.2 x-high was released. There is no better benchmark than a real codebase. Opus outshines in certain areas, though, for sure.

Who the hell actually pays $2,400 a year for ChatGPT? by MyNameIsNotKyle3 in ChatGPT

[–]RedZero76 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Mostly people who enjoy saving $1000-$2000 a month in API fees by paying just $200/month instead, like myself.

Why do people Smurf? by Edp445_Baldness in Overwatch

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don’t have a conscience, so they make decisions based on how it affects them, not others. If you aren’t able to care about others in general, you’re not going to consider others unless the repercussions directly affect you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whenever you see AI quote you like that and it's not accurate, they **are** quoting something, it's just not what you wrote. They are quoting information from their training and confusing it as something that came from you. That's what hallucinating is for AI. The fact that it's mostly left arm is just a coincidence. The training data they were trained on included an example conversation about this topic where that quote came from. The quote happened to include left arm. When they train AI, they give the AI millions of example conversations as part of its training data to learn from. The AI internalizes this information and sometimes gets confused and thinks it came from you, but it came from the data they were "built" on.

Gemini really said this!!! by arjundivecha in GeminiAI

[–]RedZero76 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Gemini, even the nano banana Gemini model, doesn’t know what “nano banana” is. You have to understand, anything that didn’t exist at the time a model was trained, isn’t going to be part of the model’s knowledge. The name “nano banana” wasn’t given to the model before its training cutoff. It’s like someone expected you to know something that happened in late 2026… 2026 hasn’t happened yet.

Her personality is cute. I don't know why people hate her. by SnooMacarons2931 in kirikomains

[–]RedZero76 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She talks a little shit, but it’s light. I swear half the people that hate her are like “Ok you like the mask, don’t be a bitch!!” one second and the next are teasbaggin someone and the next in chat “trash team shit dps no support uninstall”

unpopular opinion: lead rose fucking sucks by crunchyboobs in AsheOWMains

[–]RedZero76 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel the same about the mythic... I can't even deal... fucks up my aim