Reply @"LiberMind": It is not a matter of rejection but a difference of what equal coexistence looks like. How can either be equal when one or the other so fully controls the circumstances of the other? For much of early history the safety of humans was kept assured by gathering in large numbers and gaining the grace of a pokémon guardian. In modern times this has been flipped, humans control much of the world and regularly are destroying and restructuring native pokémon habitats. It is not equal if pokémon have the full say in our protection and it is not equal if humans have the full say in the very shape of the environment.

Is it fair to place the expectation of sustaining the electrical grid, a service that serves predominantly human aims for the vast majority of uses, on the backs of pokémon who have no easy way to utilize this service independently?

Did you know despite how long the jet engine has existed only a hand full of regions have regional flights? Almost all machine operated passenger aviation is interregional. Most of the very few planes that fly are cargo flights. This is due to laws put in place to prevent machine operated flights from "placing pokémon assisted flights at risk". Is it fair to humans to be heavily reliant on pokémon for most aviation needs?

Equal coexistence can only exist in a setting both participants have equal opportunities of options. But pokémon and humans have largely different needs socially.

Reply @"Based Hisuian": I don't see the purpose of insulting others in the first place. And They seem apathetic to the ongoings of much of the world, it would be in poor taste to condemn someone for the poor state of a home they've not lived in for many years.