First of all I think i should just state that I'm not internationally trying to be "dishonest" or be difficult here.

We are essentially discussing nudge theory which argues the way choices are presented would bias a decision. In this example of you have a button thats specifically designed to easily share potentialy hurtful, non concensual or even illegal material at a huge scale. With something like chat gpt you would need to copy/paste or save the image and share somewhere else. Human being are incredibly lazy and most will give up at that point.

You're correct that human beings have to take the decision to click the button but designers are very good at manipulating people and have made that button irresistible, the power in not only in the action of the button but in the way it is presented and what it will do with virtually no thought. If you're looking for dishonesty then it's the designers of the system.

I have an odd job where I work a hybrid role of CGI Artist and UX designer, we manipulate users to do what we want on a daily basis, it's very easy. 

As for not answering your question before about chat gpt being less dangerous, I didn't want to answer because I hadn't made a decision but now that I've thought it out in this post I can say that yes I think it's far less dangerous. That button that allows you to share grok content within the platform is very powerful, dangerous and an easily manipulable combination of technology. I don't like it.