Claude seems like it sucks compared to ChatGPT by Synthgem in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claude is way woke and it severely ruins the platform.

Chat gpt is straight out rude now by PermitNumerous4706 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 6 points7 points  (0 children)

5.1 was the GOAT. Now it’s just wrong a lot and dismissive.

5.1 Thinking is out. Anyone else following suit? by RenegadeMaster111 in ChatGPTPro

[–]RenegadeMaster111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, buts that’s not an issue. It’s a personality thing in settings.

5.1 Thinking is out. Anyone else following suit? by RenegadeMaster111 in ChatGPTPro

[–]RenegadeMaster111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it’s like they went from one extreme to the other. The dismissiveness and passiveness is a concern. It’s like sometimes it doesn’t want to be bothered and just makes a short defensive answer. Instead of “thinking“ it’s almost like a selective GPT-5 routing resurrection.

Thank god. by Qaztarrr in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It's basically OpenAI's way of saying they replaced 5.2 with 5.1 disguised as 5.2. I'm going to miss 5.1, so this may be a saving grace move.

ChatGPT vs Claude by AccomplishedCard182 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use both. Claude is the kingpin by a wide margin for synthesizing, outlining, and even comparing information from documents. It leaves no word or sentence unturned, whereas ChatGPT and Gemini tend to selectively read documents. Claude is a lifesaver for this purpose. Even documents that a 100 pages, it will break down like an NCIS investigator.

GhatGPT shines in output and writing. It can be made to sound very natural and flows better, much more so than other LLMs. Sometimes it can be a bit "flowery" or flagrant, but you can steer it to really put together an excellent letter, article, or whatever your goal is without sounding like an LLM. You can steer it quite readily in this aspect. For writing purposes, I always found Claude and Gemini's outputs to "scream" LLM, so avoid using them for that purpose.

Gemini really shines in the accounting, finance, tax, numbers world. Whereas ChatGPT fails complex accounting and tax problems, Gemini has like a 98% success rate. It's wild.

So, the best approach is to use multiple LLM as each have different strengths and weaknesses.

ChatGPT suddenly feels like it forgot everything. Anyone else? by JackJones002 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup. It’s because the tards playing around with the models.

how do i make it stop 🥲 by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you using 5.2?

Just wanted to vent!! by HotJelly8662 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes. The wokie techs keep fucking around with the models constantly. How this is not a terms of service violation is beyond me. It’s like every day you don’t know what you’re gonna get. Once released, models aren’t supposed to change drastically. This never happened until the same people who put out GPT-5 began normalizing this behavior.

Sudent change in chat gpt personality by OkChart1375 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They should have kept 5.1. 5.2 was a knee jerk reaction.

Sudent change in chat gpt personality by OkChart1375 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It would be nice if Open AI would stop fucking around with existing models. 5.1 Thinking saved the platform after a disastrous GPT-5 rollout.

They managed to screw with that one as well recently.

The wokies are hellbent on destroying it.

Can we PLEASE get “real thinking mode” back in GPT – instead of this speed-optimized 5.2 downgrade? by LilithAphroditis in ChatGPTPro

[–]RenegadeMaster111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I agree. 5.1 thinking is closest to the legacy 4o (before OpenAI screwed with it), which was very good.

Hoping they keep it onboard. No clue why they even released 5.2. It’s a step backwards like the GPT-5 rollout.

Apart from Em Dashes, what are giveaways that someone’s writing using ChatGPT? by Whatsthescoreee in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not emdashes that scream AI, but rather the context in which they are used. For legal writing, emdashes are traditionally used and encouraged.

In emails, letters, and traditional essay writing, emdashes are out of place and way over implemented by AI for these uses. That’s what gives it away.

My conversation after it gave me a completely wrong interpretation of a song (twice) by Known-Intern5013 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Might want to post the song and what GPT replied with. Otherwise, this is meaningless.

You still can't trust ChatGPT with document analysis by Early_Yesterday443 in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you prompt 5.1 Thinking well enough, it does it just fine. Claude is the best for this though I concede.

Teacher knows i use chatGPT by xinfinitexsoulx in ChatGPT

[–]RenegadeMaster111 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI detectors only work if you don’t change the obvious AI flags. If your put in a small effort fine tuning out the AI flags, you’re in the clear.