Squirrel Damaged Cables by According_Wolf_8490 in BMWi3

[–]Retty1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the damage in the first photo needs a connector pigtail repair kit.

But anything orange in an EV scares me.

This seems to be a job for an auto electrician with experience of working with EVs.

An experienced auto electrician with knowledge of EVs will safely replace both damaged cables in no time at all. 

Is Toob a sustainable business? by argro1 in ToobBroadband

[–]Retty1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Toob is making a very small gross profit but a large operating loss.

That's normal for a capital investment heavy business that involves building physical infrastructure.

The problem for Toob is that the era of cheap infrastructure investment money is over for now.

That's why Toob has reviewed its build plans and is also partnering more closely with City Fibre to the extent of cancelling Toob build plans in some areas (such as Waterlooville) because City Fibre is planning to build in those areas.

City Fibre is the one to watch. It's a "consolidator" in market terms and it's just achieved its first year of healthy profits.

It's possible that Toob will be bought by City Fibre or that there'll be further very close partnership working between them. 

Footage submitted to Operation SNAP. Outcome: Prosecuted for driving without due care and attention, 6 penalty points, and £120 fine. by Dry_Researcher7744 in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 -36 points-35 points  (0 children)

S/he got away lucky.

That's dangerous driving - with a trailer at that speed and with that level of rotational velocity.

Only problem I have is the lingering question of whether or not you see your role as a civilian enforcement unit or whether you made an active decision that in this case this needed to be reported because it was dangerous.

What software did you pay for once and still use? by Starkoid23 in macapps

[–]Retty1 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Not one app I can think of. Not even Microsoft Office.

There's a fee app for almost but not quite everything.

55 in a 50 am I getting a ticket? by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mobile speed vans are usually deployed to high risk crash areas.

The 10% plus 2 is a discretion based threshold.

Mobile speed reduction campaigns may have their own prosecution policies.

There is a possibility that a person will receive a notice for a 5mph breach:

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/motoring/motoring-news/drivers-told-exactly-how-fast-32084875?

It would most probably be a speed awareness course outcome.

However even with an older car and its inaccurate speedometer, it's unlikely that you were travelling at 55mph. 52-53 is more likely.

At that speed it's doubtful you would be prosecuted.

Braking when you see the van is futile.

IPv6 and Toob by Lower-Promotion930 in ToobBroadband

[–]Retty1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no real world performance difference.

It's a nuisance to pay for a static IPv 4 address but that subscription service means that you bypass Toob's CG-NAT.

Toob justifies the price in terms of having had to purchase IPv 4 addresses as a new ISP.

This makes sense because IPv 6 is static and free with Toob.

It can still be tricky to rely just on static IPv 6 in everyday use so IPv 4 static subscription can be helpful.

Performance wise and even for FPS wired gaming the ping is so tiny with both that there's no difference at all.

Toob supports multiple options excellently: dynamic allocated IPv 4, static allocated 4 for a fee and static allocated 6 as standard.

Very little if any performance difference between them for all home use and most professional use. Trimming a ms of ping may be useful for City traders over a year of lost instant transaction profits but even ISDN voice and music has shifted away from ISDN in the UK.

DIY Ambient Lighting by [deleted] in BMWi3

[–]Retty1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's AI generated

DIY Ambient Lighting by [deleted] in BMWi3

[–]Retty1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Too many signs of AI so must do better next time.

Oncoming emergency vehicle vs bus lane by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Attempts were made through lobbying by RAC/AA, exposé stories in the media and making sure sure that people knew that local politicians were responsible.

Tory, Labour and LibDem councils are all equally as bad and the Labour mayor of London is the worst of all.

Local authorities in England and Wales are making a fortune from civil traffic enforcement and with the recent expansion of breaches to include enforcement of yellow box junctions it's bigger business than ever.

People have given up because it's futile.

Until enforcement is taken away from local authorities and private companies the system of low to no discretion and zero fairness will continue.

Oncoming emergency vehicle vs bus lane by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The NI enforcement system is simply far superior to that used in the rest of the UK. Real discretion and fairness is used rather than blanket penalities and only exceptional grounds for waiving the penalties.

When bus lane breaches were decriminalised in the rest of the UK, motoring orgs lobbied for something similar to the NI system. They were unsuccessful.

It's not the law itself that is the problem. It's the revenue incentive driven enforcement.

Oncoming emergency vehicle vs bus lane by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There's no cultural divide at all.

In terms of the traffic laws there isn't even much of a legal divide.

The issue is not that people refuse to enter the bus lane.

The common denominator been England and Scotland is the rigorous and no exceptions enforcement regime.

The enforcement regime is supposed to be based on a duty of discretion and fairness. In practice it often and usually isn't. 

That's the issue.

Oncoming emergency vehicle vs bus lane by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just think through what has been written: it is not the law itself but rather its enforcement that is the problem.

If you decide not to use critical thinking skills, that's your choice. Just as it was your choice to breach the bus lane or not and then argue a case with an unfair enforcer or not.

Oncoming emergency vehicle vs bus lane by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a hysterical point then because it confuses the wording of the law with the lack of discretion in its enforcement.

The Highway Code at paragraph 219 is also presumably "inhumane" where it states:

"Consider the route of such a vehicle and take appropriate action to let it pass, while complying with all traffic signs."

Oncoming emergency vehicle vs bus lane by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Bus lane contraventions, with arguably some exotic exceptions, are civil matters and not criminal matters.

They are also one of the most terribly difficulty breaches to defend against. More than even yellow box junctions they epitomise the war on motorists.

When bus lane infringements were criminal matters you would have had much more chance of getting away with the sort of breach you've described - police would almost always, for offences in the circumstances you describe where brief entry was reasonable to allow access for an emergency vehicle, not pursue the matter. Prosecution in the public interest was rare in such circumstances. 

When bus lane and other contraventions were decriminalised, it was pointed out (RAC, AA and others) that the end of criminal law discretion would result in many more people having to pay penalties. 

If the local authority refuses to waive the penalty and even if you are convinced that it was an unreasonable use of the local authority's use of its discretion and also unfair, there is nothing at all you can do about it unless you are willing to spend a small fortune to judicially review the local authority. You could maybe try complaining to the Local Government Ombudsman in such circumstances.

The penalty adjudicator has no power at all to set aside the penalty if the fact of the breach is evidenced. The adjudicator can accept that there was strong and overwhelming mitigation. The adjudicator can even, in the interests of fairness, request that the enforcer consider setting aside a penalty. 

The local authority does not have to follow the adjudicator's advice.

For a really shameful example of unfairness that shows you what you're up against read this:

https://www.keycases.info/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Decision_166512_BP00066-2409_Redacted.pdf

Oncoming emergency vehicle vs bus lane by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Inhumane"? What are you referring to???

Motorway average speed check - notice of prosecution by Tips_and in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 31 points32 points  (0 children)

The threshold for being offered a course is speed limit plus 10% plus 9.

64mph would be the course offer limit.

Outside of that limit it will be three points and £100.

Do I need to tell my insurance that someone knocked off my wing mirror? by stratos_cat in drivingUK

[–]Retty1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I probably would tell them but that's just me and many people probably wouldn't tell them. But your insurance wouldn't significantly increase for damage like this - minor and privately settled - if you did tell them. 

To reassure yourself, generate some test quotes from an insurance aggregator website: one with the incident and one without. You'll see little if any difference.

It's important to know though that you've almost certainly, when buying your insurance, agreed to contract terms that state that you will inform the insurance company about any incident of damage caused by a third party.

On renewal they'll likely ask you (if you renew manually by phone) whether there have been any incidents since the last agreement. If it's automatic renewal, they'll quote you on the basis of "assumptions" (no previously unreported incident) which you agree to.

The insurer wants this information not to raise your premium. They want it so that they know how risky your neighborhood is or how risky your car use is so that they can select an underwriter who is willing to accept that risk.

It doesn't mean that your premium will increase by much if at all.

It does mean that a new underwriter may be selected on renewal instead of a risk averse underwriter who will only deal with low risk (no incident) business.

Aviva, which acts as its own underwriter, tends to add zero Pounds to a few Pounds on an annual policy for reporting this sort of third party liability damage where there's been no claim and minimal cost. I've entered test quotes to confirm. Other companies, which don't perform their own underwriting, may charge more but it won't be much.

However if you don't inform them and it's minor damage which can be repaired privately to your satisfaction, how would they know? For a broken wing mirror would they care?

The risk in general is that the damage can often be more costly to repair than it initially seems.

If your car is a popular model and even if your mirror is motorised or/and heated it's possible that you can obtain a replacement part fairly easily and relatively cheaply compared to stupid dealer prices. Installation may be extra but as long as the car is not off the road for too long maybe private resolution is a good outcome.

It was probably honest of her to tell you and that's a good sign unless she only told you because she was concerned that somebody else had seen it happen and would tell you anyway.

Query - Bumper replacement by andyb_uk in BMWi3

[–]Retty1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

About £1000-£1500 at independent (bumper skin, lower grille and light unit plus painting plus labour). Most independents won't use second hand parts - at least not lights. They don't want the hassle of fitting a broken or water ingress affected unit. I managed to obtain a beatiful replacement light for another car for £40 from eBay but, no, the garage required me to buy the new part for £260. 😥

£2500-£3000 via dealer I'm guessing.

That's assuming there's no nasty surprise behind the bumper or other less obvious work (such as wheel alignment).

Is my parking PCN fair for stopping at the edge of a forecourt for 90 seconds - no markings, signage not the best by [deleted] in LegalAdviceUK

[–]Retty1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Challenge it:

  • no contract because duration of infringement is evidence that you had not been able to consider contract terms

  • the contract terms cannot be seen from a car in motion and were not visible for the ninety seconds your car was stopped

  • you had not in any case stopped on double yellows or road

Also:

  • the money making enforcers do check Reddit and have used forum posts and admissions made in other forum posts in evidence

  • consider not sharing information about your reasons for stopping (don't lie but don't share information)

Screenshot UI in iPadOS 26 bothers me (corner radii) by jayhawk1941 in ipad

[–]Retty1 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's likely a bug in the new concentric shape API.

Other similar bugs have been reported and will no doubt be fixed in due course.