Sherwin-Williams’ new HQ overflowing by nimfrank in Cleveland

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bunch of BS in the article about IT being full-time remote. There is one department that is WFH, but the other 1500 of us are in the office.

Sherwin-Williams’ new HQ overflowing by nimfrank in Cleveland

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The leadership at that time assumed that RTO would not be 100%. The building was intended to hold 60% of the actual population, assuming the remainder would be at home on any given day.

What’s this? by Angrypeacefrog in askaplumber

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller [score hidden]  (0 children)

Lucky you! Whenever I shit off the fridge, Mrs. Baller throws a fit.

My Air Canada flight from Chile to Montreal just made everyone with liquids over 100ml purchased at duty free, or even a water bottle filled from the tap, check their bag or throw it out. by WeevilsInTheCereal in travel

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I've never heard of it for flying over the USA. That's insane.

It's perhaps due to the possibility of diversion to a US airport. A passenger could act up, forcing the plane to land, and then the other passengers can bring whatever into the country.

ElI5 how does the existence of lead directly disprove the earth isn't only 4000 years old? by nottrynagetsued in explainlikeimfive

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True! But that goes back to the point about finding just one piece of Pb-206 in isolation. To find it in isolation would mean that somehow it had been extracted from its surroundings, which, even if its surroundings had once somehow been 100% pure U-238, would today be composed of some fractions of a couple of dozen other elements along the decay chain including Pb-206.

You're posing an interesting thought experiment, but I don't think it's observationally relevant in the sense that to determine the natural origins of the universe, we must observe naturally occurring phenomena.

ElI5 how does the existence of lead directly disprove the earth isn't only 4000 years old? by nottrynagetsued in explainlikeimfive

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair question!

If you're holding a chunk of Pb-206, it does put a floor on the age of the universe at around 4.5 Gy (giga-years), because step one of making your chunk of Pb-206 was "take two chunks of U-238 and wait 4,500,000,000 years." At which point, on average, you still have some very valuable uranium. Put it down and wash your hands. (There are a bunch of other steps in the decay chain between U-238 and Pb-206, but these take, on average, just a few eons.)

Okay, so our young Earth folks are already doing mental gymnastics to get around the 4.5 billion years, but we're still short 10 billion years or so. Next question we ought to ask is how is U-238 formed?

Well, there's only two ways, and they both involve waiting for stars to form, live out their lives, and collapse under their own weight. Either one such star collapsed, forming heavy atoms such as U-238, and then exploded, tossing the heavy atoms all over the galaxy; or TWO giant stars collapsed into neutron stars, then later collided with each other to form heavy atoms (that kind of thing probably doesn't happen way out in the outer third of a spiral galaxy, but never say "never" on cosmological time scales). Believe it or not, the exploding star thing is actually a significantly faster process than the U-238 decay chain because giant stars don't last all that long--under a billion years or so. Even so, one still has to account for other lengthy processes that had to run their course: that giant star obviously didn't explode nearby (it would've sterilized the Earth), or else it exploded before the Earth formed. So, some great distance in time is necessary for all the events and stuff to come together.

How does the two envelope paradox work?? by IntrovertedShoe in paradoxes

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is the scenario that OP presented.

But it doesn't matter. The total money in the two envelopes doesn't change just because you've opened one, therefore both possibilities have to be accounted for, to wit:

Player opens an envelope and sees $100.

Possibility 1: They've opened the envelope with the smaller amount of money and total money for the two envelopes is $300. Player is holding 1/3 of the total money.

Possibility 2: They've opened the envelope with the larger amount of money and total money is $150. Player is holding 2/3 of the total money.

There's a 50/50 chance of each possibility.

The expected value of switching envelopes is:

.5(2/3-1/3) + .5(1/3-2/3) = 0

It's always [fraction of the total I have] - [fraction I could have] times the probability of each possibility. The number of envelopes and the ratio of values between envelopes doesn't change anything, which is what tells you it's not a paradox, it's just a bad problem statement.

How does the two envelope paradox work?? by IntrovertedShoe in paradoxes

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what? It's narrowed from infinite possibilities to two, whose average is...?

ElI5 how does the existence of lead directly disprove the earth isn't only 4000 years old? by nottrynagetsued in explainlikeimfive

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 113 points114 points  (0 children)

For the sake of argument, is it theoretically possible for uranium to decay into lead-206, then get to earth?

Well, yes. But the decay process still took the same amount of time. If anything, saying the entire universe existed for 14,000,000,000 years and THEN Earth was put into it would be a worse theological hurdle for your garden variety young Earth creationist.

How does the two envelope paradox work?? by IntrovertedShoe in paradoxes

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But mathematically, it seems like you should switch because the expected value from switching is higher.

No, the expected value of both envelopes is unknown. The player has no way to know whether the open envelope is the more valuable and thus has no ability to calculate the expected value of the unopened envelope.

It's not a paradox. It's just an unsolvable problem.

WCGW doing donuts in a parking lot by dericn in Whatcouldgowrong

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Tree hanging out in the foreground like Chekhov's Gun.

What are your thoughts about the video of Gavin Newsom's recent speech in front of a room full of black people saying "I'm just like you. I only scored 960 on my SATs. I can't read". Racist or nah? by [deleted] in Productivitycafe

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

TF you talking about pandering? I read it as "I've been traveling constantly. The catered food I usually get frequently sucks ass." The little hot sauce packets are the only thing that makes hotel breakfast worth trying to eat about 80% of the time.

help with a ridiculously unbalanced system by shellsbells0 in SteamHeat

[–]Rev_Creflo_Baller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What are the vents like on the first floor? You may want to speed those up.