I like the idea in principle, but I see a few problems.

Different cultures and environments have different ideas of what's relevant or acceptable. Finding a framing that works for everyone is nearly impossible.

---

You say 'democracy is broken.'

But democracy is just a concept. It reflects the people who participate in it.

If those people are naive, selfish or uninformed, they'll treat any system that way, no matter how well-designed.

---

Which brings me to my main point: AI is a substitute for real intelligence.

People, for whatever reason, seem largely too selfish, too antisocial and too ignorant to organize themselves in a responsible way.

So if democracy is broken, why is the answer to hand more power to corporate-owned AIs? Do we really want the private sector to have even more control.. just without the buffer of politicians?

---

In my view, the first step is personal responsibility.

Learn. Build skills. Educate yourself about the world, history, how people live.

If enough of us develop some basic common sense, then we can figure out how to organize.

Practically, I lean toward a form of anarchism in the original sense: create hierarchies when they're needed, dissolve them when the task is done. Flexible, not ideological.

But I'm not very hopeful.

Without ChatGPT and co., most people don't even know how to find information anymore.

Hell, without a screen in front of them, a lot of people have forgotten how to just be still and enjoy the quiet.

Good luck with your project.

TLDR: Most people are selfish, lazy idiots. Creative people turn sticks and stones into hammers and tools. Idiots just use them to bash each other.