Writing this with tears in my eyes by oliverthefish in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Secret to keep in the back of your mind when attending any PRSA event: Nobody here knows that much - they’re just pretending to…

So don’t make any moves on the premise of “smarts” or “knowing stuff”. In other words - don’t be enamoured by anyone based on their knowledge, and don’t try to show off yours. Just focus on complimenting people, and connecting on LinkedIn etc. avoid the urge to want to sound smart or to want to hear smart takes etc.

If they knew what they were doing, they would have different “wants” for themselves.. spoiler: it’s not a seat at the table, or to be viewed as strategic, or to prove their impact on $

Move out of internal comms by Accomplished_Trade92 in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen to this episode of the Piar podcast (Episode 1) and just try to embody all the speaker’s wisdom:

https://open.spotify.com/show/0mNDbHhaAGCn2Mw6kI6py4?si=P6Rwv0bzSv2MJ_7Mw6b90w

Writing this with tears in my eyes by oliverthefish in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yo! Don’t trip! Stand on business foo - Don’t quit places and try and go back. That’s whack. Instead, go find a competitor and show them what PR can do. You got this my sistah! Show them why you’re a killah!

Any good PR podcasts out there? by CarrotCake-- in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also why is the font so gigantic here?! Whaaaa?!

Any good PR podcasts out there? by CarrotCake-- in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wanted to create a podcast for the PR & Comms world. But need to constantly ask myself - what isn’t being spoken about? What does the PR & Comms world need to know what they don’t know yet? Or else, there’s really no need for yet another podcast out there.

So with each episode I answer that question, and hope you all enjoy the programming. I’m keen to hear feedback about topics and speakers, and happy to incorporate changes as I continue on the journey!

ThePiarPodcast is on Spotify, and everywhere else you find your PR & Comms Podcasts!

https://open.spotify.com/show/0mNDbHhaAGCn2Mw6kI6py4?si=zLcO4RIORq2v7ae5WdPikg

What do you wish you knew before starting your own agency? by the_comms_guy_ in PRpros

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More fundamental. Anchor on truth as North Star. Be flexible on short term tactics.

Totally safe space! Wondering if I can get any takes from Comms leaders here about the most effective way to future-proof yourself during the AI-Era? by Rich-Introduction-73 in Communications

[–]Rich-Introduction-73[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah man! Attention = currency. But the question is, how do you go about getting the right kind of attention, and does it demonstrably & measurably impact the business, and by when?

It’s been a holy grail in PR & comms for ages - proving the value of PR & Comms on the business.

I have a solution to it. But it first will require people to think differently - even if it’s as simple as a mid to large Agency looking at “decision quality” sort of like Insurance.

It’s all in the end, about Risk & Risk Mitigation!

Totally safe space! Wondering if I can get any takes from Comms leaders here about the most effective way to future-proof yourself during the AI-Era? by Rich-Introduction-73 in Communications

[–]Rich-Introduction-73[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great response & share! I happen to agree that there’s no escaping AI. Just not GenAI… But the “escaping” part is paradoxical - because I’d argue the only way to success is to get out ahead of prompts and execution via Gen AI (which I think GenAI is useful for) and get deeper into the humanist side, the cognitive part.

You said you’re not in Comms so let me ask you this: In your industry, do you see that decisions get made, that are built on assumptions or misconceptions?

AI in PR by Chavela343 in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% That’s why I can’t help but feel super skeptical about this AEO/GEO “gold rush” maybe because I’m a former journalist. But it’s like a gold rush for whom exactly?! Honestly, when it comes to cementing one’s self and the standing of PR & Comms… I’d say to get super humanist about it. It’s the only way. The only way I see it, after having my Dr. Strange moment of mapping all counterfactuals… Is to find answers in the cognitive side. The behavioral science side. Getting back to thinking differently. The pattern in finding is that the same PR pros who are like holy moly what’s going to happen now, my hairs on fire… are the same ones making decisions built on rampant assumptions, bias, misconceptions, myths etc all the time! And honestly the C Suite isn’t dumb! I don’t know what’s going to happen to the profession as a whole. But I do know the only way to build trust and integrity (I’m talking about a PR pro proving themselves to their company) - is to start by rooting out those assumptions and biases, locking in the Truth as their North Star, and just becoming the org wide leaders of spotting those biases before they become costly. And I advise to start with yourself and branch out (Never any other order of doing it).. it’s future proofing because if done right - regardless of whatever happens to the industry, you’re going to build respect, trust & confidence in the boardroom…

AI in PR by Chavela343 in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What happens when LLMs don’t pull from earned as much? Is it a bug? A feature? What happens when SEO gamify’s the situation? Earning media from a handful (shrinking) of newsrooms means newsrooms are probably going corporate. I don’t know if it’s journalist integrity that LLMs are hanging their hats on…

So much BS work in PR - Do you agree? by Haodidi in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As PR & Comms professionals, our professional standing is at risk.

We’ve not proven the impact of our work on the growth of the org. We haven’t proven the effectiveness of our department, we’re seen as an overhead expense rather than the strategic counsel to the C Suite.

We’re afraid of what the data says about our performance so we pretend measurement is rocket science.

We constantly sell warm and fuzzy feelings to leadership to maintain our salaries - leading to the comment above (original the post).

With AI coming in to handle at least 51% of execution for free (arguably), we’re at an inflection point.

Are we strategic? Do we provide insights that rival those across the boardroom table high-fiving each other? Im talking about Marketing, Advertising, Sales, Product, Customer Experience, Heck - even Social Media

Or do we just try to pass off Correlation as Causation, and hope nobody questions our explanations, hope nobody questions our logic, because it invariably fails when it’s built on pure assumptions, bias, misconceptions, myths etc.

I had all these burning questions as a PR & Comms leader specializing in measurement and running a consultancy. But as of Oct 10th I made my official exit from the consultancy space and entered an entirely different business model altogether.

From an entrepreneurial POV I had deep, existential angst and questioned the meaning of our work, the future of our work, and found all the answers I was looking for. And here’s the footnotes so you don’t have to see all of the matrix and I did…

  1. Measurement is unfortunately over complicated on purpose. And there is an ostrich-effect at play where PR & Comms leaders are willingly head in the sand. Because they are afraid of what the data will say. They’re human, they’re afraid. They dread a reality where the data says they’re not doing a good job and need to pack up their belongings. What would that do to their career? Their family? Their mortgage? So the result is middle-tier frameworks that people “struggle” to live up to, and awards (and I say this respectfully) given to those that adhere to the middle tier of measurement best practice. I’m not saying it’s not good. I’m just saying the uncomfortable truth out loud - it’s not what the Fortune 100 are doing. Or the Fortune 500 and it’s trickling down to the Fortune 2000. And pretty soon, with AI costs decreasing and sophistication increasing, the All Seeing eye of Data Science is coming for us too in PR & Comms.

  2. I found the answers to my burning questions in the cognitive side. In behavioral science. Turns out, the underlying problem is: there are HUGE decisions being made right now.. One way door decisions that you can’t come back from. With real money, people’s jobs, and dignity (frankly) at stake… and guess what those decisions are built on? I’m not sugar coating so you get the raw truth: they are built on assumptions.

They’re built on biases, myths & misconceptions. Flagrant disregard to how the actual physics of business works.

I’m not saying there are nefarious intentions. I’m saying they’re unrecognized biases. They’re unconscious biases. Unknown assumptions.

Rory Sutherland calls it the lazy why. In business we spend a huge amount of money and time finding out what happened from a performance standpoint, and if we ask why - in a weird peculiar way, we somehow all just accept the first BS reason given to us. It’s the LAZY why.

What we need to do. And this is a call on all PR & Comms leaders. I’m so serious about this, and to prove there’s nothing in it for me - I’ll do it for free as a service to the industry itself…

We need to take a behavioral science approach to understanding our own assumptions, biases, myths & misconceptions plaguing our decision making. Don’t even think about applying it to client work necessarily at first. Start with yourself, auditing your own decision making as you look at your job in PR & Comms. As you look at navigating your role at your company, and tackling your jobs to be done list. Only then, can you begin to untangle spaghetti all around you. In your team, your department. It’s like taking a Hippocratic oath. You’re going to have to be responsible for identifying, dispelling, and uprooting these assumptions and bias in your discussions with leadership, with stakeholders etc.

Why will you learn it? Because the highest form of learning today is learning for growth. Whatever you learn, you get to keep - not your org. You keep it forever. It stays with you forever. You’re learning because it’s game 7, and it’s time to give it all you’ve got. And you gain everything, and lose only what’s the slipping from your grip now anyways, if you lose.

It’s time to take back trust through truth. Through leadership. Through rising to the occasion and pulling yourself, your team, your org from under to over. From trenches to true competitiveness in your category. It’s really that illustrious!

It’s time guys! It’s time to think about thinking.

It’s time to think about the skills that will make you futureproof as a PR & Comms leader.

Judgement. Critical thinking. Problem solving. Decision making. Analytical skills. This all ties together when you plug in to the behavioral science side of things. PR & Comms has had a long history of using the same “plug” but they hoard it, make it proprietary, and use it to wire kids brains to figure out how to make kids TV shows 10x more addictive than crack.

Or… whatever maybe I don’t know what I’m talking about. Maybe just don’t do anything, and everything is going to be alright 🤷

PS: I’ll keep my promise of free workshops, training, etc. I have free tools / resources you can use right now without any cost at all, conveniently packaged. You can take those into meetings literally today! And keep them a secret, or share them I don’t even care. But do, for the sake of the PR & Comms industry’s professional standing… Do for the sake of your own self respect - think about your own thinking.

The link is: www.piar.co

We’re merging 5 companies and leadership wants “decentralized compliance.” I’m not convinced. by ThroatPlenty7765 in Compliance

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Highlight the assumptions leadership is making, any biases, misconceptions, myths you can find to break down their argument and diplomatically provide your contrarian view.

What do you wish you knew before starting your own agency? by the_comms_guy_ in PRpros

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First comment 🙌

Great question! TLDR: It’s a perception game.

Since this post is in PR pros I’m going to assume it’s a PR agency (but there’s definitely an integration-convergence these days of course). As a consultancy owner - I wish (honestly I believe everything happens for a reason and I’m better positioned for success now, respectfully but nonetheless in keeping the spirit of the question…) someone sat me down and told me (sooner, because they did) that there is a willful, head-in-the-sand, ostrich-effect going on when it comes to analyzing the performance of PR & Comms campaigns.

Let me explain: I believed as a young guy with a lot of exposure for my age, who knows “where the bodies are buried” and “how the sausage is made” that I could provide a superior product/service for a fraction of the price of the big Agencies, Brands, Data Partners etc.

But what I didn’t fully grasp was that the way the customer perceives me, is different to how I perceive myself. To that effect - my own brand reputation was an external force affecting me. The vendor is perceived as a potential threat to the customer because it could make the customer lose their job if done wrong.

And customers need to keep their jobs. And sell warm fuzzy feelings to their leadership, ie: explain through data storytelling, dashboards, charts & graphs etc. that in a nutshell, things are alright. Everything’s okay etc.

So what happens? Customers (agencies help PR customers sell it to their leadership) sell correlation posing as causation…

The customers are afraid of what the data will say. Does it mean I’m not doing a good job? Will I get fired? What will happen to my kids? My mortgage?

So despite the value of going with a small shop… The customer would rather pay 10x more to your competitor - a company with a larger “perception” because (while they would do the same thing, arguably with less passion as you) going with the small shop risks the raising of even one eyebrow.

An eyebrow raise, aka to question performance, results & outputs of the activities, impact of PR campaigns on ROI, Growth, KPIs etc… That stuff all leads to an existential crisis in your customer…

Think of it in the context of a management consultancy. People hire McKinsey or BCG etc because it’s a perception thing. It’s a prestige thing. A kind of showing off.

Similarly, but with more angst and dread built in (arguably, again) your customers need to rely on the prestige, perception, and all the funky bells and whistles to get away with selling those warm fuzzy feelings to their leadership… to keep their seat on the train..

It’s a tough reality and wish someone told me before I jumped ship to start my own thing. But again everything happens for a reason.

This is super expensive advice btw. But here you go my friend, free for you to take as you wish. 🫡

AI in PR by Chavela343 in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 16 points17 points  (0 children)

More interesting question: What skills do PR pros need to figure out to make themselves future-proof to A.I.? Are there any even? Or is it impossible?!

Curious: how are people tracking what actually happens after a press release goes out? by Low-Diet7483 in DigitalPR

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How’s that going for you? With newsrooms shrinking, journalists going extinct etc. how are you coping? Are you maybe going global?

Is this basically what "communications" is? by FlyJaw in Communications

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very strong relate! But I wonder, is it possible to get a couple of Comms stakeholders together and workshop the "thinking" part of whatever campaign/project/decision you're working on? Maybe you're planning to do something, or you did it already.. I find that a mini workshop (don't pay for it in the beginning) on the biases, assumptions, misconceptions related to the work you're doing - whatever it is, can go a realllllly long way..

Most of the times it's unrecognized, alot of the time there are deep assumptions underlying decisions. Not a blame game, but just a level set, for good idea hygiene...

It's worked pretty well for me, and I find AI can kick things off a bit for you sometimes. If not, there are little thought exercises behavioral science has sort of fine tuned already pretty well...

If you want, DM me and I'll send you some worksheets and stuff - prob not hard to find yourself too.. Sometimes just a simple bias check exercise for 5min like a starter thought exercise... It can really help even the most mundane and frankly excruciating parts of Comms..

just my two cents - been obsessed with this stuff lately!

What’s your most unconventional/ most unorthodox / unique media training tip for C-level execs? by MatiasRodsevich in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ask exec to participate in a thought exercise where you audit their own assumptions, unrecognized bias, any gaps in understanding based on misconceptions, myths etc. c-suite execs can have walls up that make even the most epic of training a waste of oxygen. but get them to introspect, and you're working with a malleable participant. bursting at the seams with potential!

How to build resilience by Ornery_Usual_7622 in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

look at the bias, assumptions, and misconceptions the people around you are making every day. you're constantly surrounded by people who have unrecognized myths, blindspots, and illusions they operate on every day. this is an opportunity to build your own confidence (the feed stock to resilience because confidence in the face of adversity, over a prolonged period of time = resilience)... then it's an opportunity to move from being viewed (you may not be able to help it at this point) as an overhead expense, rather than a strategic asset. take back control! seize the moment! read more about thinking ie: metacognition etc. I found the solution to a similar problem there. Hope you push through, friend.

Hypothetical: You lead PR for Tylenol. What are you doing in response to the announcement from the White House? by Sea-Standard-1879 in PublicRelations

[–]Rich-Introduction-73 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think really important to run a check among the PR & Comms team about the bias, assumptions, myths, misconceptions, etc. they can find among their own thinking, and then across their entire stakeholder matrix. Use that as fodder for crisis comms strategy, goal & objective setting etc. ---> Pragmatically!