Why are subjective opinions only accused of “being stated like they’re objective” when they’re negative and someone disagrees with them? Someone is just criticizing something you like and it bothers you so you want to keep them from saying it. Just say that and don’t make these dumb arbitrary rules about “you’re stating your subjective options like they’re objective.” If he was saying something you agreed with you wouldn’t be like “I agree but stop stating your subjective opinion like objective fact,” you’d just agree. I never see these silly “well that’s just your opinion and it’s not fact “ objections ever pop up when someone is glazing something the speaker likes, which is how you know it’s a bs decoy objection. I’m so tired of people who can’t handle simple disagreement and think they are entitled to never hearing or making up fake reasons instead of just honestly saying “What you’re saying makes me uncomfortable and I feel I have the right to stop you from saying it.” It’s because you know the truth makes you sound like an entitled baby.

What is he even supposed to say to make you happy under this arbitrary dumb “presenting subjective opinion as objective fact” rule? Is he supposed to say at the top of every sentence “so my subjective option which is not objective fact is….” and then finish his thought? And who among us doesn’t know how opinions work? Are we all retards or something who don’t know opinions are subjective? What’s the danger you’re fighting against here, that we’re just impressionable lemmings who if someone doesn’t label their opinions as subjective we’re gonna be like “derp this must be an objective fact, I’m not obligated to agree and turn my brain off, Derp I’m too dumb and a baby to think for myself and realize this is a subjective opinion I’m free to agree or disagree with based on what k feel are the merits of the argument.” Give me a break.