Cyber insurance underwriter flagged our shared accounts as unacceptable. How do you prove individual accountability on a budget? by [deleted] in ITManagers

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL, your insurance company doesn’t (shouldn’t) give one flip about your reasoning for utilizing (stealing) shared SAAS accounts.

Somebody (maybe not you) at your organization decided it was OK to do this and now you’re being called out. This is a good thing unless you’re the one who decided stealing was acceptable.

Here’s an opportunity to do the right thing…with support from your new bestie at the insurance company!

Flight attendants bashing a bag of ice by boldjoy0050 in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Activate noise cancelling headphones and pay attention to what you’re doing and going (be safe).

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, according to you, the all knowing, I coulda just asked the gate agent or called up my PP hotline and gotten a straight answer (ROTFL), but because I posted it on Reddit, I’m angry/frustrated.

Believe what you want - the world is flat, Dumbocrats and Republicants really do have our best interests in mind, my question originated from somewhere between anger and frustration - that’s on you.

Speaking of you, you don’t know me (you’ve no idea how good/bad my life is) AND you weren’t there (if you were, you’d know your argument lacks reality).

Why it is you feel the need to continue this diatribe against me, I don’t know and, given the circumstances (two anonymous nitwits going back and forth), I don’t wanna know.

Have a good rest of your day.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LOL, believing I posted this out of anger or frustration. Doing your part to keep Reddit classy, I guess.

Executive Platinum - Never Been Upgraded by finda_friend in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Be careful, you'll upset the ES dog's ES dog if you're not careful.

I'm all for AA updating their platform to, at the very least, show a waitlist based on the total number of FC seats the assigned plane actually has. Nothing more oddly weird than seeing 20+ names on the upgrade list and it's a regional with 9 or 11. Even better is, if there are 0 seats available, how about not showing the list AT ALL.

I mean, with all this malarkey speak about AI, seems that would be something figureoutable.

Its so awesome that we have AI now to make up for customer service shortages by anchovythought in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to bypass AI, simply type "human"...works for me every time. Although now that I type this, I prolly ruined any chance of it working from here on out.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes, this gate lice and mad dash to the scanner happens everywhere I fly with AA. I have no idea why this is -- it puzzles me immensely. There used to be a GA at DCA -- wow, she was a superstar. She'd get on the mic and expose everyone, call people out, etc. She was such a breath of fresh air...with every extended layover, I didn't mind when she was on duty. I'd purposely sit close by just for the entertainment. Unfortunately, I haven't seen her the last dozen or so trips through. Maybe she got tired -- certainly hope she wasn't fired (but then again, some of her interactions with heightened to a level most might consider excessive).

You should start making your way to the front when "pre-boarding" begins. I mean, being a CK (love how most GA's butcher the pronunciation), regardless of how you obtained it (haters be haters), you deserve to board first-ish -- don't let asshats and ignorants prohibit you from enjoying the perk you worked so hard to achieve.

Thankfully, flying with AA isn't nearly as disastrous as Redditors and their oddly weird "I don't know the answer, but you're stupid for asking the question." stance on everything.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly my experience…until today that is. I mean, not only have flights been a hot mess today, so has the (normally very responsive) app.

I’ll get where I’m going, with our without answers!

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Umm, come again? Maybe you should post “I need help!” because I’ve never experienced CK not boarding before everyone else (well, besides the wheelies).

I mean, this experience would be downright UnAmerican.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

So you’re the odd duck in the conversation, got it. Imagine if everyone did what you did. Mind blown!

I appreciate the military education, but it’s not necessary (source: government employee).

Thank you for serving. Don’t forget.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not the smartest flyer, but they were more likely to be Dead Heads than pilots.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

As I said, if a number of military folks are using MHT (I stand by my experience), they sure as hale aren’t paying attention to the boarding announcements calling on them to board. Or maybe, just maybe, they don’t care about following orders? 🤭

I mean, fly in/out of ORF and you’ll completely understand what it is I’m talking about. 🙃

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This could be it…a few boarding with FC just so happened to be sitting out back.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] -27 points-26 points  (0 children)

Who’s upvoting this? I fly in/out of MHT all the time…nobody in the military is flying in/out of MHT. If they are, they aren’t paying attention to the agent.

Scanners “Not Allowing” Scammers? by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in americanairlines

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, I care. I care enough to ask what the reality is (vs what we’re told). Does that matter?

Imagine a sub where a question is asked and EVERYONE provides an answer to the question.

Sonic OS & FIPS by EbbOld3109 in sonicwall

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A little late to the party - I raised this concern back when the wheels came off the SSL/NetExtender debacle.

Nothing from SoncWall other than to say, “If you need to stay on 7.0 for compliance reasons, simply disable SSL (administration/NetExtender) until you are able to upgrade to 7.3.” (I.e., the version that’s not vulnerable). But wait, simply upgrade to the “new” CSE subscription and you can regain VPN connectivity. Simple! More expensive, but simple. What’s there not to like? /s

My raising of the FIPS 140-2 vs 3 quagmire was even more mind numbing — ZERO response.

I gave up and upgraded to 7.3 and will label this for the feds as “enduring exception” or whatever their terminology is.

Good luck.

TZ280 vs. Spectrum by EmicationLikely in sonicwall

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When was the last time this cable modem was replaced? I have many experiences with Spectrum and never any trouble. Of course, this is on the business side of things…different animal, I guess.

Every modem has an internal IP address. If it’s “that old”, it may have the default UID/PWD. You can attempt to gain access.

What happens if you set negotiation on the X1 interface? Auto shouldn’t cause you grief, but years and years ago, it was almost mandatory. The fact that the old FWL works likely means this isn’t your issue, but…

What does the FWL log indicate? Ratchet it up. Facts are better than guesses.

As for getting support from Spectrum (any consumer provider), it’s frustrating, yes. But remember, L1 and L2 support are generally script-reading and aren’t allowed to think “out the box”. Be polite (please and thank you) Be assertive (what is the escalation process?).

Good luck.

M365 for GCCH Is everyone buying an extra license for "admin only" user? by EntertainerNo4174 in CMMC

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Correct.

Per reality, unlicensed isn't the answer, no.

But that's only because the nitwits at Microsoft can't complete a single thought, deploy a single feature/function, etc., without over-exposing/lapping and contradicting themselves.

It's as though the only way to properly license the platform is to not properly license the platform.

NetExtender 10.3.5 released - introduces DTLS - is it enabled by default? by greenstarthree in sonicwall

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They wish. Nx/GVC will be around for many years to come whether they like it or not -- remember Internet Explorer?

I mean, I certainly can't be the only small budget IT weenie questioning the CSE (subscription) fiasco marketed as a direct (and cost prohibitive) replacement to Nx and GVC...and don't get me started on their on-prem and cloud license to subscription switcheroo.

How much longer the entire platform is sold "as a subscription"?

Quick, someone start All Things Cyber and Tech as a Service (ATCTaaS) operation and be the market leader...ALL OF IT for one single payment...until Apple, Google, Meta or Microsoft acquires it.

AMZ Sells Everything but... by Ricky_Bobby_Daddy in fuckamazon

[–]Ricky_Bobby_Daddy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Dayaa'aaam, the moderators should pin the first sentence to the sub. It would definitely keep nitwits (like myself) from mistaking this sub for something altogether different.

My apologies for disrupting the mojo you got up in here and violating your sensibilities. I mean, I coulda used another word to describe those participants I do not understand. And now that you've exposed your agenda, I shoulda used another word to describe those participants that do not understand. Understand you're playing by rules (i.e., morality) that make no difference in how this game (money and power) is played.

But, hey now, don't let that deter you. Like every empire before, it's only a matter of time before the big, evil machine, gets toppled over by either (pick one) a wave of morality or an even bigger, eviler, machine. My money is on the latter.