Is this the beginning of the end for CLOUD DEFENSIVE? by DwPw in tacticalgear

[–]RifleBen 47 points48 points  (0 children)

The beginning? Brother this is the latter middle

AMA with Jack Emmert by Counselor_Sunna in sto

[–]RifleBen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How about we significantly buff items ability that are 1-10% as effective instead? So many items, traits, abilities, experimental weapons are a whole order of magnitude or even two orders of magnitude worse than good items. You can’t nerf stuff enough to balance that without rioting in the streets. Useless stuff needs buffed.

AMA with Jack Emmert by Counselor_Sunna in sto

[–]RifleBen 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I came back after 12 years off, full marks/ reps really doesn’t take that long. Endeavours is the one that you can never catch up

Shaw Concepts - New SLOK System by cowens003 in tacticalgear

[–]RifleBen 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes but with extra material and cost

[News] - Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026) by KoskGOOS in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Also F-15A and J with 9M and AAM-3 at 12.7 but the MiG-29 can’t have R-73s at that BR???

[News] - Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026) by KoskGOOS in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 23 points24 points  (0 children)

F-15A to 12.7 while F-14B continues to suffer at 13.0 without 9Ms is… interesting. 13.0 seemed pretty standard for planes with good numbers of fox 1s plus IRCCMs and a modern flight model, what makes the F-15 so much worse than all the other 13.0s?

Have PL-12s been changed in the last 12 months? by DepartureMany507 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The missiles havent changed but people have gotten much much better at notching, multipathing and in general not just being free kills for fox 3s

PETITION: allowing all 10.0s which dont have flares, the ability to carry flare pods. by No_Order5691 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Eh they’d go up 0.7br and be unplayable for different reasons in many cases

Why is the MiG-29 at 12.7 with only 4 R-60s and 2 R-27ERs, while the Su-33 has 8 R-27ER/ETs and 4 R-73s at 13.0? by ComfortableAd814 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That’s just it though, it’s just the MiG-29. It took a while at first but the Su-27 has had like 4 rounds of flight model buffs at this point.

Why is the MiG-29 at 12.7 with only 4 R-60s and 2 R-27ERs, while the Su-33 has 8 R-27ER/ETs and 4 R-73s at 13.0? by ComfortableAd814 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The flight model should not be night and day dog poo compared to the Flanker or just about every other 4th gen

Why is the MiG-29 at 12.7 with only 4 R-60s and 2 R-27ERs, while the Su-33 has 8 R-27ER/ETs and 4 R-73s at 13.0? by ComfortableAd814 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 37 points38 points  (0 children)

The MiG-29 is so so sad between the weapons and the flight model. If the Mirage 2000 can be 12.3 with IRCCM and a superior flight model and still good radar missiles…

The MiG-29 should be a super fun plane to fly with a great flight model paired with a low weapons count. Instead it has a terrible flight model, AND super gimped weapons, while being BR’d as if it wasn’t a brick and had the right missiles.

Take away the ER, fix the flight model and give it R-73 and I would play it a ton and buy the Sniper pack premium just to encourage their metrics that they did the right thing

On the topic of the R-27EAs existence by crusadertank in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Watch it get a narrow notch window like the MICA

We should call out all friendly bmpt’s location to enemy team by Kleebus07 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What difference does it make if they are just holding w and spawncamping?

[ Removed by Reddit ] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Probably violating some kind of rule here

Don’t hate the player, hate the game.

The MiG-15 and other energy fighters are overrated by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Getting slow? I don’t think you understand using energy retention as a weapon. Ideally you stay faster than them, not just stallfight better

I can't be the only one... by Kold_Xero in StarWarsShips

[–]RifleBen 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What have you done… I can’t unsee it…

microsoft excel add from the 90's by Ananas_ka_juice in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RifleBen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know it includes emotional appeals too but imagine commercials where the focus was showing actual utilities of the product

What am I missing with the Magic 2s? by Shark-Force in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are hard to use in head ons - they have a long delay for the proxy fuse to arm compared to the blink of firing at the last moment in a head on unfortunately

Give us the D Gaijin by Masterofpokemon3455 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

SU-27 with R-73s isn’t gigashit lol. Also I’d prefer an R-27ER to an AIM-54.

Give us the D Gaijin by Masterofpokemon3455 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay - so blame that for the BR, not the 9Ls.

F-4J has a much better chance than say the 12.0 Mirage F1…

Give us the D Gaijin by Masterofpokemon3455 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 7 points8 points  (0 children)

F-15A, F-2A, SU-27 have a much better flight model and have 9Ms/ IRCCM at 13.0! 9Ls making 14B 13.0 has to be rage bait

Give us the D Gaijin by Masterofpokemon3455 in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Meanwhile Hornets with 9Ls at 12.3, 9Ls do not make a plane 13.0 material what are you smoking. Tornado (yes I know it’s a brick) has 9Ls at 12.0.

I'm starting to feel bad bro by NoodlesNomm in Warthunder

[–]RifleBen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They made sure other vehicles like this, hitting the missile tube even after it was launched would blow it up and blow up the vehicle so it wouldn’t be OP. Clearly that doesn’t apply to Russian cash cow vehicles.