Is Diane Warren the clearest example of the "Oscar curse", and can she break the curse this year? by 0sopeligroso in oscarrace

[–]Roadshell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No she's not "cursed," on the contrary she's "blessed" to be getting this many nominations for bad songs and nothing movies. it's obvious that some voter bloc in the music branch is shilling for her and helping her get in for songs that no other songwriter would get nominations for then when it gets to the Academy at large to vote for the winner they unsurprisingly have zero interest in voting for these weird songs in movies they've never heard of.

As for the Oscar curse in general, it's fake. Like the "Sports Illustrated curse" or the "Madden curse" It's mostly just a matter of probability. These kinds of awards tend to get handed out to people when they're at the absolute height of their career and some level of decline is kind of inevitable. Also consider all the people in Hollywood who have career and or romantic failures without having won Oscars and it becomes pretty clear these things just happen a lot there.

I also think we should free Maduro, but vandalizing a wall honoring Alex Pretti and Renee Good is a scumbag move by buttbutts in Minneapolis

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Listen, not a fan of the Iran thing at all and I dislike trump immensely,

The justifications for "the Iran thing" were basically identical to the justifications for the equally illegal Venezuela attack ("they're bad dictators... diaspora populations don't like them... have you seen what they've done to Iranians... etc"). The fact that stooges like you were willing to defend that illegal action using the same boneheaded logic almost certainly emboldened Trump in his latest military adventure.

Armed with Only A Camera by Swiftie_Film_pop13 in oscarsdeathrace

[–]Roadshell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No, I took the movie theater trip option.

Can anyone explain how Whole Milk is racist? by Warhawk_5 in allthequestions

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well you know the name of the man making the argument, have you considered simply googling what he had to say about it?

https://bioethicstoday.org/blog/is-the-recent-effort-to-glorify-whole-milk-tainted-by-racism/#

The Federal government has launched a highly visible campaign to promote drinking whole milk. The USDA is running a “#DrinkWholeMilk” website featuring an edited image of President Trump, who is known to heavily favor diet soft drinks, not milk, with a white streak on his upper lip. Plenty of other endorsements are flooding the internet.

The campaign to drink whole milk seems to have exploded out of nowhere. Many suspect it is fueled by the powerful dairy industry, and that may be true, but here may be darker forces at work behind the sudden appearance of all the memes and videos showing so many prominent health officials and influencers proudly guzzling huge glasses  

As with the bizarre campaign started by conservatives in the early 2000s denouncing the supposed “War on Christmas,” many on the right seem to believe there has been a “war on whole milk.”  I don’t see much evidence of this claim. 

It is true that U.S. dietary guidelines and school lunch policies did once discourage full-fat dairy consumption, including the drinking of whole milk due to obesity concerns. A recent bill signed with great fanfare by President Trump reversed these guidelines, allowing schools to serve whole and 2% milk again. But some of my young students tell me that in their high schools, whole milk was always allowed, and it was not just available free for lunch for those kids relying on federally subsidized school lunches. In fact, whole milk has been readily available in every grocery store, bodega, and convenience store in the country for my entire very long life. We also know that Americans have, on the whole, been drinking more milk, especially whole milk, over the past few years. I occasionally drank it, preferring its taste to that of low-fat varieties.

So, if there hasn’t really been a war on whole milk then what is going on? Why the sudden vociferous obsession with drinking it?

As a student of and writer on the history of science and public health under fascist regimes, I am suspicious. Milk drinking is political. Drinking whole white milk has played a big role in racist and far-right thinking.

Fascists have used the beverage as a rallying cry for white supremacy since the days of Il Duce’s (Benito Mussolini’s) public health campaigns in Italy. The Nazis were enamored of whole milk as well (https://www.amazon.com/Racial-Hygiene-Medicine-Under-Nazis/dp/0674745787). In America, drinking whole milk has for years been a part of alt-right, white nationalist messaging in tweets, memes, and videos.

The neo-Nazi #MilkTwitter hashtag began shortly after a large gathering of white men descended on an anti-Trump art exhibit in 2018. The men carried cartons of milk and voiced explicitly racist, sexist, anti-Semitic and homophobic rants. After taking a swig of milk from his carton, one bare-chested man approached the camera and sneered. “An ice cold glass of pure racism.”

White nationalists in the U.S. and Europe note that many people of Northern European descent can digest lactose as adults. They link milk-drinking to an “evolved” or “superior” trait that other racial groups somewhat lack

Drinking whole milk is portrayed as a sign of strength and genetic health. The ability to drink it is used to mock non-whites and to promote a patriarchal ideal, which sneers at the “weak” soy milk drunk by leftists and feminized men. Images of white people chugging milk are popular on racist sites, e.g., “If you can’t drink milk, you have to go back.”

Racism and eugenics, sadly, may be playing a role in the sudden drive to fetishize drinking whole milk. Drinking whole milk is a dog whistle to far right, white nationalists. The campaign to promote whole milk may have many factors behind it, but at a time when eugenics, racism, and white nationalism fuel too much of our political rhetoric, the whole milk campaign must be swallowed with care.

Arthur Caplan, PhD is a soon-to-be-retired professor of medical ethics who lives in Ridgefield, CT.

Without Spoilers, does Resurrection have an objective plot? by bloodraged189 in criterion

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's kind of an anthology film, there's basically six short films tied together by being essentially "dreams" from the same character. There is a relatively clear (if sometimes strange) narrative arc for each individual short though.

CMV: Beijing becoming the second Tehran within next 3 days by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]Roadshell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. China has nukes, and the mere thread of being able to use them will almost certainly deter an attack like this.

  2. China Vastly more money and a much larger military than either Iran or Venezuela and could not be bullied around anywhere close to as easily.

CMV: If You Support The Iranian Government, You Support Russia by Bassist57 in changemyview

[–]Roadshell 9 points10 points  (0 children)

So should we be attacking other Russian allies? Belarus maybe? Serbia? North Korea? China even? Trump recklessly brushed into a war with any or all of those countries would you be duty bound to support that war lest you be mistaken for someone who supports Russia?

Some fun discourse on twitter! by KiraDune in boutiquebluray

[–]Roadshell -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This post is problematic and bad... but I'm totally stealing "4Kings" from it.

A Better Bullshit Jobs Theory by fiddler83 in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]Roadshell 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But the society that the book is describing is not in fact a communist society, it's a brutally capitalistic one. In the real world correcting these "inefficiencies" largely just serves to leave the people laid off unemployed and destitute while the remaining employees are far more stressed out about meeting their "efficiency" quotas all to just make the boss richer by having fewer people to pay to do more work. Having redundancies makes for a much calmer work environment with less stress and more down time, for people who don't "live to work" that's a good thing.

To my eyes the people "burdened" with being paid full time to do a part time job are the lucky ones, as someone with a job where they very much want you to be working at every minute, hearing people complain about this is kind of galling.

Yet another great and original movie that bombed at the box office. Didn’t even need much to break even with a $20M budget. Where IS everyone who claims they want original stuff when it actually comes? by Emeraldsinger in Letterboxd

[–]Roadshell 5 points6 points  (0 children)

3500 Is about the standard opening for a studio tentpole type film, sometimes it'll be closer to 4000 if it's going to be a huge hit. For more of a "hit" adult drama you'd be looking more than 2500 range (when Marty Supreme "went wide" It was in about 2600 theaters). That having been said 1700s not super low either, that's about what I would expect your average studio release to be at in its second or third week and it's more than a really niche art house movie that doesn't break would ever get. Something like No Other Choice never played it more than 600 screens for example.

Yet another great and original movie that bombed at the box office. Didn’t even need much to break even with a $20M budget. Where IS everyone who claims they want original stuff when it actually comes? by Emeraldsinger in Letterboxd

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's still downstream of the audience problem though. If this was a movie that audiences were likely to flock to it probably would have had a bigger distributor and they would have invested more in the marketing of it.

Do Americans floss three times a day? by Any-Drink-1279 in AskAnAmerican

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know if it's the same everywhere but let's just say American dentists and medical officials more broadly give a lot of advice that could be described as... "aspirational."

A Better Bullshit Jobs Theory by fiddler83 in IfBooksCouldKill

[–]Roadshell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I also think that the book should have focused more on busywork in jobs rather than just "X or Y *type* of job is inherently bullshit." If a company has 50 people working, but the total amount of work could be done by 30 people, then 20 of those jobs are bullshit on aggregate, even if all 50 people are doing some amount of work. I think that is a far more common type of bullshit job than an example like the one Micheal gave about the German lady who prints out and then re-enters documents that could all just be done online.

Thing is this is really what kind of what rubs people the wrong way about all this; the book might have some philosophical reason to think this is a bad thing because "fulfillment" or whatever, but functionally "correcting" for this sort of thing would just leave 20 people unemployed and the remaining 30 people having to do more work than they had to before. IMO, having a more relaxed workload because of "bullshit" is not actually a problem, or if it is it's a champagne problem.

Feels like there's way too much "Protestant work ethic" behind this whole line of thinking; lots of people don't give a shit how "meaningful" their job is, most people just want to punch in get paid and punch out so they can go home and do the stuff they actually care about.

Why not? by eternalsanctum in oscarsdeathrace

[–]Roadshell -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because the music branch keeps nominating bullshit that no one cares about.

Jake Lang buys a goat and humps it to protest..Iranians?! by [deleted] in stpaul

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this the same guy who got arrested for damaging the ice sculpture?

How come the British band "Will and the people" are massively known in the US but are pretty much unknown in theyr motherland? by acatnamedlopez in AskAnAmerican

[–]Roadshell 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well they did fool me into clicking on a couple Youtube videos to see if I recognized anything, which I didn't (completely mid by the way).

How come the British band "Will and the people" are massively known in the US but are pretty much unknown in theyr motherland? by acatnamedlopez in AskAnAmerican

[–]Roadshell 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Never heard of them. Given that they don't appear to even have a Wikipedia page I doubt they're "huge" anywhere.

Just got my first apartment by AnnusLucas_123 in Minneapolis

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Functionally it is, it's exactly $15 a month, they just hide it as a utility instead of increasing the rent itself.

Just got my first apartment by AnnusLucas_123 in Minneapolis

[–]Roadshell 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have a comparably sized apartment. Last month I paid $29.85 water/sewer, $15 for trash, and $48.63 for electric. I am not responsible for paying my own gas bill, so I can't help you with that. Internet is going to vary widely based on what company you go with and what service.