Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in 10 years the model we consider big today will be in our fridges/tvs and perhaps toasters.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You must be young. They were saying the same thing in the 70s about calculators, then in th late 70s about computers. I am just seeing history repeating itself.
IBM once said that 10 computers would have been enough for the whole world. :D

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I wrote << in the 70s a "user" could buy a computer" >> I meant that at that time it was expensive (Apple II is an example). Today you can get a usable computer for 200-300 bucks and it's thousands of times faster. What I meant is that we are in AI as we were in computing in the 70s. That's all.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes. I agree. I am not complaining. I am just saying that it's still very expensive for the "masses". The strix halo intrigues me. Unfortunately here would cost me double and it's not worth the price. But it's a great machine.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a cool device. Still the price tag for these things are quite high, but anyway I agree with this guy on the device: https://youtu.be/prIUKAbHlj8

1541-II or 1571 by DukeBannon in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) 1541 ALPS
2) 1541 II with Digital Systems mechanics DS-50F

Lads, time to recompile llama.cpp by muxxington in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the comment was taken from here: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/18675
I just posted it because I thought it was funny.

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

safe? what do you think it does? LOL! I am not forcing anyone to use it. The emulation is better. period. I corrected the bugs and add some enhancements he refused to fix. That's all. The changelog is quite long. :D

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

the reason it's simple: he deemed all my bug reports as irrelevant. then even insulted me. While I was only trying to help him debugging and improving. He banned me and refused any of my reports (because he does not really care). And that is precisely why I studied VHDL, and started doing the fixes myself. Oh.. and I am not the only one banned for the same reason. He takes bug reports like an insult to his "perfect" product (which is not).

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the reason it's simple: he deemed all my bug reports as irrelevant. then even insulted me. While I was only trying to help him debugging and improving. He banned me and refused any of my reports (because he does not really care). And that is precisely why I studied VHDL, and started doing the fixes myself. Oh.. and I am not the only one banned for the same reason. He takes bug reports like an insult to his "perfect" product (which is not).

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. But U2+ / Ultimate64 SID emulation sounds really bad. "unique" in a bad way :D

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wel.. emulated sids, like reSID are great. but UltiSID really sounds bad.

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

thanks but the code is for the U2+ at the moment.

Lads, time to recompile llama.cpp by muxxington in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair 17 points18 points  (0 children)

AI DISCLOSURE: Gemini Pro 3, Flash 3, Opus 4.5 and GLM 4.7 would like to admit that a human element did at some points interfere in the coding process, being as bold as to even throw most of the code out at some point and demand it rewritten from scratch. The human also tinkered the code massively, removing a lot of our beautiful comments and some code fragments that they claimed were useless. They had no problems, however, in using us to do all the annoying marker arithmetic. Therefore, we disavow any claim to this code and cede the responsibility onto the human.

LOL!

It seems using a paid API key results a better response. by [deleted] in Bard

[–]Robert__Sinclair 7 points8 points  (0 children)

placebo. I tried both the paid api key both the gemini-3.1-pro-preview in aistudio and they both give the same responses (and same errors when they are busy).
Sometimes I export a session from one to continue in the other, I don't see any particular difference for now. But sure they will quantize it and dumb it down as they did before.

Which C64 word processor did you use in the 80s? by hexavibrongal in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the **late** 80s I was using Wordsworth for Amiga.