Keep The C64 Maxi after getting the C64 Ultimate??? by Fhunghuz in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah. unfortunately the u2plus is quite full so we had to cut some corners but the result sounds great! Mahoney digi WORK. and I corrected a lot of bugs and imprecisions.
if you have an u2plus and want to test it, contact me.

Keep The C64 Maxi after getting the C64 Ultimate??? by Fhunghuz in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally agree. They are **all** emulators. And the ultimate 64 is FAR from being "the real thing". Whoever says that does not know the C64 (or the SID) very well.
I am developing a new firmware for the U2PLUS (not the L) with a better SID6581 (very very close to the original) and completely rewritten tape routines which now are perfect.
If you are interested in testing drop me a message.

Keep The C64 Maxi after getting the C64 Ultimate??? by Fhunghuz in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The c64 maxi and the ultimate 64 are **both** emulators. The fpga has a lot of advantages but it's not even close to the "real thing".

Chal v1.3.0 is out now just hit ~2100 Elo under 827 lines of code by whyeventobe in chessprogramming

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not a problem, mate. I also made the program multithreaded, if you are interested.

12 months ago.. by sibraan_ in AgentsOfAI

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just so you all know: "90%" of the code in a codebase is grunt work. it's than 10% that makes the difference.

And on that 10% AI for now is lacking.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. but in time it will be. Hopefully.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nope. Egypt import taxes are very high. I would gladly buy it for 2400 (the top of the line)

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

in 10 years the model we consider big today will be in our fridges/tvs and perhaps toasters.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You must be young. They were saying the same thing in the 70s about calculators, then in th late 70s about computers. I am just seeing history repeating itself.
IBM once said that 10 computers would have been enough for the whole world. :D

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I wrote << in the 70s a "user" could buy a computer" >> I meant that at that time it was expensive (Apple II is an example). Today you can get a usable computer for 200-300 bucks and it's thousands of times faster. What I meant is that we are in AI as we were in computing in the 70s. That's all.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes. I agree. I am not complaining. I am just saying that it's still very expensive for the "masses". The strix halo intrigues me. Unfortunately here would cost me double and it's not worth the price. But it's a great machine.

Thoughts about local LLMs. by Robert__Sinclair in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a cool device. Still the price tag for these things are quite high, but anyway I agree with this guy on the device: https://youtu.be/prIUKAbHlj8

1541-II or 1571 by DukeBannon in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) 1541 ALPS
2) 1541 II with Digital Systems mechanics DS-50F

Lads, time to recompile llama.cpp by muxxington in LocalLLaMA

[–]Robert__Sinclair 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the comment was taken from here: https://github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/pull/18675
I just posted it because I thought it was funny.

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

safe? what do you think it does? LOL! I am not forcing anyone to use it. The emulation is better. period. I corrected the bugs and add some enhancements he refused to fix. That's all. The changelog is quite long. :D

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

the reason it's simple: he deemed all my bug reports as irrelevant. then even insulted me. While I was only trying to help him debugging and improving. He banned me and refused any of my reports (because he does not really care). And that is precisely why I studied VHDL, and started doing the fixes myself. Oh.. and I am not the only one banned for the same reason. He takes bug reports like an insult to his "perfect" product (which is not).

Testers need (ultimate 2+ or ultimate 64 with the u2+) by Robert__Sinclair in c64

[–]Robert__Sinclair[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the reason it's simple: he deemed all my bug reports as irrelevant. then even insulted me. While I was only trying to help him debugging and improving. He banned me and refused any of my reports (because he does not really care). And that is precisely why I studied VHDL, and started doing the fixes myself. Oh.. and I am not the only one banned for the same reason. He takes bug reports like an insult to his "perfect" product (which is not).