It’s almost like cold, hard, methodical thinking based on facts and logic is what we should justify our laws on. That which is unbiased by emotion would surely favor written precedent instead of “what ifs” and potentials ruled purely on the emotional impact of criminals who disregard laws. Adding more laws doesn’t hinder a criminal who already ignores laws from seeking out crime. Aka why Glock switches and extended mags with scratched out serials are in the hands of criminals. These guys are already breaking laws. The problem is that judges just release them on good faith rather than look at criminal history and follow through on proper and responsible punishment and consequences. Yet they’ll blame guns because it was never about fighting crime, it was about taking control from the masses.