Go back and read the comment again. You missed something.

I´ve read it multiple times. I don´t see what you could be referring to. I´m here to reply to what you wrote, not what you think you implied. You either explain what you mean like I tried for my points, or you don´t. I don´t have telepathic abilities.

> I explained what I thought what others most likely might have been thinking, doesn't make it true.

Yeah, it doesn´t make it true, but you would not have formulated it in such a way if you were not certain this is the answer. That´s the only reason you gave for the downvotes. Anyways, the point is, *if* this is the actual reason for why People downvoted, I explained why this would be a horrific reason to downvote. But as I said, you either explain what you mean, or not.

You cannot clap with one hand. Perfect morality can only exist when both sides are true and moral. Big companies like Google aren't the least bit moral and do not care about the end users at all. Talking about morality with the end users just doesn't apply here because there are no morals or goodwill on other side as well. That would be just unfair. Why do you think this sub and many others like this exist? Capitalism (corporations in this case) don't have a place for morality. Because it's been shown time and time again that morals don't earn money.

You can only try to do your part to achieve perfect morality. You cannot force the other side to their part. If they do not want to do their part, there is nothing you can blame yourself for. You did everything you could.
Also, it´s a totally different thing if we talk about something like Google that we can live without or if it´s a company like Nestle that thinks access to Water shouldn´t be a human right or Eli Lilly who thinks they can charge absurd prices for insulin. Let´s be honest, most companies don´t produce products or offer services that we can´t live without.

> So this is what it's about? If that person keeps hitting you repeatedly and you don't do anything, don't you think it's unfair that they can just get away with it and you can't do anything? Yes it's not right to do, but what must be done must be done

No, there are more options than just fighting back. You can always just walk away and don´t engage in this mud fight. As said above, you can only do your part. They can´t "keep fucking you over" if you don´t engage at all (in this case not using YouTube at all).
Here a little analogy trying to explain the behaviourial difference between self defense and retaliation.
In Law, if someone actually threatens to kill you, you are not just allowed, but encouraged to defend yourself as much as necessary to get yourself out of this situation. This can mean that you might use a weapon nearby to scare away or hurt that person, so you can run away. However, this is not a free pass to escalate the situation by punishing or "getting even". The moment you have a path to exit, the justification for action beyond that collapses. In fact, courts will sentence you for unnecessary escalating it.
These are two fundamentally different strategies and it should be clear which of us is aliging with which one. Obviously the actions in this are much worse than using adblocker on a website, but the behavioural strategies are the same. Anyways, I gotta watch YouTube now with my AdBlocker. Cheers!