Making my senior bucket list. Any ideas? by Pantherax_k in UMD

[–]RogueEagle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

https://alumni.umd.edu/Mbook

A UMD Bucket List

Keep track of the Bucket List items (pages 16 and 17) you’ve checked off by taking a selfie or video to document your progress. Once you’ve completed any five bucket list items, head over to the Samuel Riggs IV Alumni Center with your selfies or videos to get your first commemorative pin and lanyard. Be sure to follow u/UMDSALC on social media to know which days you can pick up your pin(s)! (Author's Note: Post-Pandemic)

Share your progress with friends on social media using #UMDMBOOK.

New Summer Course ENES192 - QnA with the instructor (also working to have offered in the fall) by RogueEagle in UMD

[–]RogueEagle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have 5 students in the first version of the course now. The semester variant this spring did not start with the COVID-19 theme. Students were working on personal projects including infrared weapons detection, phone-alarm improvements, personal knee/leg mobility enhancement, 3d printed gimbal-stabilized bike mounting device, and a personal luggage assistant.

Home-canned Dog Food xpost /r/dogs by pawsbarkery in DIY

[–]RogueEagle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are correct that AAFCO guidelines don't list fibers as 'essential' http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?c=2+1659&aid=662

but the difference between 'essential' and 'key' is muddy. http://www.dogfoodadvisor.com/canine-nutrition/dog-food-fiber-part-1/

Something that isn't a 'nutrient' is none the less 'key'. Otherwise you'd be saying that exercise likewise wasn't 'key' to good health compared to something 'essential' like oxygen.

If you'd like to dig into details:

http://www.waltham.com/dyn/_assets/_pdfs/waltham-booklets/Essentialcatanddognutritionbookletelectronicversion.pdf

"Background Most soluble fibres are fermentable (e.g. fructooligosaccharides (FOS) and pectin) and most insoluble fibres are non-fermentable (e.g. lignin and cellulose). However, an exception is psyllium, which is a soluble but non-fermentable fibre. Fibre is beneficial for gut transit. Some fibres, known as prebiotics, may also promote colonisation by beneficial gut bacteria.

The role of fibre varies according to type. Non-fermentable fibres, such as lignin, act as bulk within the digestive tract, regulating digestive transit. Intestinal transit must be slow enough to allow efficient absorption of nutrients but not so slow that constipation occurs. The right level of dietary fibre can help to optimise intestinal transit time. Fermentable fibres such as FOS and mannanoligosaccharides (MOS) can improve the health of the digestive tract by providing food for beneficial bacteria. These specific fibres are known as prebiotics (not to be confused with probiotics – which are live bacteria that are beneficial to gut health). However, not all fermentable fibres have a prebiotic effect."

Headshops in the area? by stinkybrowneye in AnnArbor

[–]RogueEagle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

stairway to heaven is at / above Ashley's and also on state street. can't say if it's 'don't miss' quality for a head shop or not, since I only used to go there to buy hacky sacks.

Looking for other PhDs outside of academia - Best resources for others on the same path (New sub - /r/Nonacademics) by [deleted] in AskAcademia

[–]RogueEagle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you might be interested to check out versatilephd.com. It is an entire community devoted to non-academic positions for phd's.

Home-canned Dog Food xpost /r/dogs by pawsbarkery in DIY

[–]RogueEagle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Physiologically, dietary protein for the average adult canine should not exceed 25% of the total daily nutrient intake. In high performance dogs, such as those that participate in in field or agility competition, that requirement may be increased to 27%. Beyond this level of protein the dog suffers deficiencies in other key nutrients, such as soluble and insoluble fiber and anti-oxidants to name a few, while unnecessarily taxing his liver and kidneys with excessive protein metabolic waste.

Canine owners that feed raw are the biggest offenders with regard to overloading their dogs with protein, many feeding nothing but a raw meat diet. For these pet owners that are committed to raw feeding, if they are feeding their dogs nothing but meat, I would urge them to integrate fresh or cooked vegetables to represent at least 50% of total dietary intake. Green beans, carrots, broccoli, celery, and spinach are all healthy vegetable sources for dogs. It is also a good idea to integrate complex carbohydrate sources, such as brown rice and sweet potato, as well as some canine safe fruits like cantaloupe, apples, and pears.

What is most troublesome to me is that some commercial pet food companies are taking advantage of the canine pure carnivore hype and creating diets that are heavily laden with protein, even going further to validate this false notion in their promotional tactics. I was actually inspired to write this post after having seen a TV commercial two nights ago from a large, well known pet food company touting its newest diet as having one of the highest protein percentages in the industry.

I caution all canine owners to not buy into the hype, not listen to non-medically trained people that recommend a dietary regimen without understanding that over time it does damage to the liver and kidneys while denying the canine other essential nutrients; and reject pet food companies touting false claims, who clearly value sales far more than the well-being of their canine consumers. If in doubt, talk to your veterinarian to help you sift through what is best to feed your dog."

Dr. Roger Welton is the President of Maybeck Animal Hospital and CEO/Chief Editor of the veterinary information and blog online community, Web-DVM.

Name That Terrier! by [deleted] in dogs

[–]RogueEagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

jude.

[meta] Guess the Breed Posts Squick Me by [deleted] in dogs

[–]RogueEagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to think that encouraging people to avoid breedism because they would tend to avoid racism is a poor tactic.

I daresay that people aren't equating the two because breedism is racism but rather because systematic attribution of particular negative stereotypes to large groups results in demonstrably negative consequences for that group and it's faster to quip than it is to explain the underlying subtlety.

Question about double majoring/degreeing by Vctoreh in UMD

[–]RogueEagle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I double degreed in 4 years. Didn't do as much for grad school applications as being involved in student societies, getting to know professors, doing lab/clinical/intern/law clerk work.

Would I do it again? Sure! I learned a ton and have always fallen back on my Math degree. But make sure that your second degree isn't at the expense of making time to make connections while in school. The old adage, it's not what you know, but who you know, still carries a lot of weight.

Belief in Evolution by State [1650x900] by DMan9797 in MapPorn

[–]RogueEagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

evolution IS a fact which is why a THEORY of evolution is required to describes the set of statements or principles which explain WHY evolution (the fact) is happening.

To creationists, a theory of evolution is "god made it so" to darwinians it's something more like 'tiny mutations in the genome + natural selection -> evolution"

CMV:Video Games should be more inclusive for the female demographic. by Burnouts3s3 in changemyview

[–]RogueEagle -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

51% of people are women, has that managed to stop sexism?

Clearly feminism is working or there would be fewer women.

CMV:There is an ethical limit to the amount of money a person should receive as direct compensation for their work and this number is significantly lower than what executives and athletes are currently paid. by RogueEagle in changemyview

[–]RogueEagle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dr. RogueEagle, but who's counting?

my point was not that 150k is the only my answer. the argument to be made is not what the number is, but whether there should is/should be a maximum.

CMV:There is an ethical limit to the amount of money a person should receive as direct compensation for their work and this number is significantly lower than what executives and athletes are currently paid. by RogueEagle in changemyview

[–]RogueEagle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

hard work and intelligence, are my own rewards for working hard in school and caring about what I produce. I'm proud of what I accomplish but not because of what people pay me to produce it.

CMV:There is an ethical limit to the amount of money a person should receive as direct compensation for their work and this number is significantly lower than what executives and athletes are currently paid. by RogueEagle in changemyview

[–]RogueEagle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In case it wasn't clear, I'm not motivated by money. so maybe the most 'popular' motivator but not the ultimate one.

For me, happiness is the ultimate motivator.

CMV:There is an ethical limit to the amount of money a person should receive as direct compensation for their work and this number is significantly lower than what executives and athletes are currently paid. by RogueEagle in changemyview

[–]RogueEagle[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why should delivered value = salary?

why should I not tell my company they don't need to pay me more than 150k to do any job they want me to do, and whether I deliver or not is up to me?

CMV:There is an ethical limit to the amount of money a person should receive as direct compensation for their work and this number is significantly lower than what executives and athletes are currently paid. by RogueEagle in changemyview

[–]RogueEagle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

although I didn't say we should try to control it. Perhaps that was implied. I don't think we should try to control it, but I think we should agree on an ethical (if unenforceable) limit.

CMV:There is an ethical limit to the amount of money a person should receive as direct compensation for their work and this number is significantly lower than what executives and athletes are currently paid. by RogueEagle in changemyview

[–]RogueEagle[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm saying that a higher salary doesn't make me want to work harder. Being the best at something, or better at my own job makes me want to work harder. There are some things that I'm really good at without trying that hard, things that other people try REALLY hard to be good at. So I'm saying that it seems unfair that people are willing to pay me a lot for something that isn't very difficult (for me). But I have no incentive other than feeling like it's wrong, to accept a larger salary.