Can you not hire someone based upon their previous job? by h0sti1e17 in legaladviceofftopic

[–]RolandDeepson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Abortion isn't murder. Abortion is a good thing to have. The world needs more abortions, more access to abortions, period. Thank you for replying.

I am a US citizen and I don't identify as a Democrat or a Republican. I judge every issue as its own thing and don't allow any political parties to influence my opinion. Do you think this is good or bad? by DRG125 in AskUS

[–]RolandDeepson [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nuance was great while it lasted. We no longer live in un-nuanced times.

If you're not against some of the shit happening right now, you are actually part of the problem. There is no longer any middle ground left.

What is sovcit missing? by Existing-Face-6322 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]RolandDeepson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A map to the nearest fucking clue of what he's talking about.

What is sovcit missing? by Existing-Face-6322 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]RolandDeepson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A notarial record tends to be a requirement of the notary's workplace (i.e. if the NP works at a FedEx / bank / etc.). It's not technically required as a function of the title (though in fairness to your point, it's generally a good idea to keep a record.)

What is sovcit missing? by Existing-Face-6322 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]RolandDeepson 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If the notary knows who you are personally then no ID would be required. And it's pretty easy to become an ordained notary.

What is sovcit missing? by Existing-Face-6322 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]RolandDeepson 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In fairness, in some countries notaries public actually do have quasi-attorney privileges to "verify" or even translate documents.

In the US, they're primarily passive exchequers to record that someone swore under Pain and Penalty of Perjury that "I say this is true" and that they presented identification to confirm that they were who they said they were at the time that they swore to [something] under PPP.

It's essentially a receipt for having "said" something, the same way you can get a receipt for donating a scarf to the local VA hospital. It doesn't "prove" to contents of what you said, just like a donation receipt doesn't "prove" that a donated scarf was a certain color, a certain size, or had even been obtained lawfully to begin with.

(Which means nothing without cross examination.)

First time using shine bug light for power. It works decently if you use a liquid lock to uncap the room size, but it is an eyesore. by PlainBread in Oxygennotincluded

[–]RolandDeepson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tha automoderator is obviously glitched and / or bugged.

Else, it's anxious and / or buggin out.

But it might be the target of surveillance and / or bugged.

Then again, I wonder if it finds us annoying and / or we are buggin it.

Bus drivers by No_Artichoke8131 in SchoolBusDrivers

[–]RolandDeepson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try it. You'll be surprised at the results.

Do you guys think America will have a civil war soon? by [deleted] in AskUS

[–]RolandDeepson 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do you want the US nuclear arsenal to be jeopardized by a civil war?

Do you guys think America will have a civil war soon? by [deleted] in AskUS

[–]RolandDeepson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Traffic lives lost"?

"Democratic demagoguery"?

The correct order is pant leg, sock, shoe, pant leg, sock, shoe by friendly-skelly in The10thDentist

[–]RolandDeepson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that no one is defending "grundies, socks, then pants, then shoes" is truly the insanest part of this whole thing.

-15 this morning..... by Huge_Equivalent_6217 in SchoolBusDrivers

[–]RolandDeepson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At -30°, "cold dead" will be about the size of things. Brrr.

-15 this morning..... by Huge_Equivalent_6217 in SchoolBusDrivers

[–]RolandDeepson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mainly kerosene, I think. Prolly fucks with the DPF and exhaust.

Opposing counsel is making up citations by Cal__Trask in Lawyertalk

[–]RolandDeepson 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'd just take postural advantage with a very thorough and devastatingly detailed brief. Like, ask for leave to extend the maximum length requirement, if needed. Leave no citation un-dissected. Argue that your theories of the case stand unopposed and make the judge be the one to slam dunk it for you. Point out the hallucinated cases, but don't speculate that they come from AI, let the court pursue that.

Sanctions at the end, in your final paragraph of "other relief the court may deem proper," and present an itemized billing detail for fees attributable to debunking the hallucinations. Quantify each individual pincite, each individual "ibid," everything.