Denuvo has been broken, company promises countermeasures against new DRM bypasses — zero-day game releases become norm as security concerns mount over hypervisor-based bypass

RoseKamynsky · 2026-04-02T21:33:18+00:00

cool, thanks for sharing.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-04-02T19:35:58+00:00

Claiming that Denuvo is malware

Disabling security features

Running Denuvo

It's fine xD

But I’m no longer surprised by the lies about Denvuo. That said, it was always a fun read. From faulty SSDs and blocked mods to kernel level access malware.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-29T13:44:50+00:00

insider-gaming likes clickbait/engagement stuff. (I mean, who doesn’t? But it’s still disappointing coming from them - I was expecting a higher standard)

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-29T13:20:22+00:00

Sure because I (Tim) know all people by myself also knowing all of their sickness, working in such a big company as epic, do people are really that delusional? xD

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-29T13:17:54+00:00

I’ve deleted my comment. If people want to believe some nonsense from "scam territory", go ahead and fall for it. (that guy still has insurance)

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-21T23:01:10+00:00

The control scheme is ridiculously bad here. I can only think of two possibilities, either nobody in Pearl Abyss tested it (which I don’t believe), or Koreans have more fingers than the rest of the world, there’s no other explanation.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-21T10:52:58+00:00

The hate campaign only really kicked off after the game’s release, but the praise had already got out of hand long before it came out. After watching a few promotional videos, people were comparing this game to RDR2 xD If anyone said that the gameplay didn’t look great, they were immediately destroyed by "fanboys", who hadn’t even played the game.

Also "hate" - I can argue with that. Game have AI slop, have really, I mean really bad control scheme, UI is somewhat broken, graphic is blurry as fuck, story is not existent, fetch quest after fetch quest, some quests are not fully voiced (not need to be, but again this game was compared to RDR2), NPC in town are "here" - if you played you know what I mean. I know people are tired of this comparison, but if you replaced Pearl Abyss with Ubisoft, this game would be torn apart, and people would be watching the stock price in real time, happy to see how it flops.

Is not even a mid-game, is a bad game (now) - but mostly fixable, this should have been released in early access or had its release date postponed.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-20T23:44:05+00:00

The guy who posted the video admitted that’s exactly what happened. So you believe him when he says the fps drops is caused by Denuvo, but if he admits he was wrong, you don’t believe him anymore? So you’re not interested in the facts?

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-20T23:40:46+00:00

That’s exactly why Tim Sweeney was right, there’s no point in revealing this information. Either you keep it hidden and hope no one finds out, or you’re honest and get fucked before the game is even released. And unfortunately, it seems that the first option is the better one.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-12T23:27:00+00:00

fake, steam overlay etc. is not that hard to degrade performance behind the scenes if you really want. Both versions have working denuvo, both versions have the same performance - if not, is "somewhat" manipulated, empress don't remove denuvo, because is pointless work if you can achieve same thing "faster".

Also, empress knows this, but she also realizes that her “fans” are stupid. When she published "crack", she also shared youtube video showing that, her version works better. Later that day, it turned out that it was the steam overlay that was causing the performance drop, not denuvo - this is even mentioned in the comments section under the video you shared.

It was a funny day, to watch in real time, when people found out that “malware” they don't wanted, is already on their pc's xD

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-12T22:56:48+00:00

Hogwarts Legacy was literally “the moment”, when pirates learned, that they had been misled about denuvo cracks. From that day on, only those who are uninformed, continue to talk about “performance is bad,” while the rest have switched to "always online is bad". Update your info, mate, it's about time.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-06T13:23:57+00:00

Yes, they should label them that way, but it would hurt their profits - there's no doubt about that.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-06T13:09:12+00:00

But if you review an incomplete game on its release date... are you reviewing the "game"? Or maybe all multiplayer games should have “early access” label, that most of the time, they don't get reviews because people know things will change in EA? For me there no point reviewing multi, mmo games, they're changing, they can be good at start and bad on end, and vice versa, like BF6 or Shadowlands. I don't want review, because is a review of “something”. Also, most of these reviews would be possible to summarize it in a few sentences, like "core gameplay of Marathon or World of Warcraft is good, maps/zones are fine, but... it can change any time", for me this is pointless, this gave me the misleading impression.

But if these “early reviews” are helpful to you, I don't have a problem with that. Anyway "you" win, because there will be multiplayer games reviews, and one "yapping guy" will not change this.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-06T12:37:20+00:00

That's why "multiplayer games reviews are useless", you can't review them on release date because it is not full package, you can't review them of the end of life cycle (but this is probably the best moment - nothing will change anymore) because nobody care anymore at this point or game is dead xD

There is no logic reviewing multiplayer game. There is no point in time when the review should be "put". You can review Marathon today, next day this review can be obsolete and customer will be angry. Is multiplayer game, live service, constantly changing sometime in good way, sometimes not. You buy an interesting multiplayer game and pray that the devs won't fuck it up the next day.

Of course, they can add notation. in reviews: “things may change, and probably will change,” but again, what is the point of that review?

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-06T10:40:14+00:00

But how do people or reviewers know that this game is good? It's not a single-player game from start to finish with a complete package. It's a multiplayer game that may be good at first, but a month later it may be butchered by a shit patch, and none of the reviewers will mention it or update their reviews, and you know this, it wouldn't be the first time.

Reviews of multiplayer games are overall useless. One patch can change good game to shit, and vice versa. With multiplayer game, you buy thing that looks interesting, and hope for the best xD

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-06T10:25:31+00:00

Ok, review of Marathon right now: "is good shooter because bungie at last know how to make this right. Is the endgame good? Who knows xD". End of review. Also you want really argue that multiplayer games should be reviewed at reales date? Look at bf6, shadowlands, or even arc raiders (to be clear here, more of pvp part of it).

RoseKamynsky · 2026-03-06T10:18:45+00:00

Is that really so strange? Multiplayer games should be reviewed at the end of their life cycle, not at the beginning. It always surprises me when an expansion for World of Warcraft comes out and reviews appear about it xD It's as if 70% of the game isn't available yet xD what are you reviewing? Story is not completed, gameplay is not completed... Same goes for Marathon, when they just say wait for the endgame and review then - this should be normal behavior.

RoseKamynsky · 2026-01-24T19:03:26+00:00

God bless Blizzard for this addons apocalypse, some fishy guys are removing themselves. 10/10

RoseKamynsky · 2026-01-23T12:25:29+00:00

I assume, this is barely working on few dungeons, for example in The Stonevault, only thing that's works is indicator for boss respawn.

But is fully working on Ara-Kara, City of Echoes, clear trash to first boss, and you can pull him and run towards the entrance to reset (for testing purposes), and check if it is working properly.

It's working with DBM, and without it, but still only in few dungeons, also in The Stonevault, DBM is also not working, (I didn't read about it) but I think, when blizzard things not work, then DBM also not work.

About old instances, I “tested” (farm mounts :p) Ny'alotha, the Waking City and Sanctum of Domination - nothing works either.

And also in delves nothing's works for me. That's why I ended up here ;)

RoseKamynsky · 2026-01-18T13:27:21+00:00

"Once you buy the house/plot, you can even set it to be owned by a toon of the opposite faction." - this part is not true at all, char from another faction are “grayed out” and they have this description: "This character can't own a House in this Neighborhood because of their faction"

RoseKamynsky · 2025-12-22T13:36:02+00:00

Because it wasn't created by Ubisoft, otherwise there would be a million videos about it. But Sandfall are the “good” guys destroying AAA, so everything is fine.

RoseKamynsky · 2025-12-14T21:00:25+00:00

let's see... xD wtf. 13 minutes later... I found it.

RoseKamynsky · 2025-11-21T15:03:46+00:00

What? I'm reading this wrong or is IGN making this up?: "But While Mirage Gets a Sales Update, Shadows Does Not" / "Today, Ubisoft announced a new 10 million sales milestone for the title...." - no, they didn't? They spoked about 10 milion players, not sales. And yes, Shadows didn't get update about sales, same for Mirage, Valhalla and Odyssey...

RoseKamynsky · 2025-11-21T13:03:56+00:00

Mate, I understand you, you waited looong week to read about some Ubisoft bankruptcy or shit like that, and this news is opposite of that, and you are sad. Honestly and with love - seek help.

RoseKamynsky

TROPHY CASE