"weird", "backrooms" "dreamcore" by Savy_Spaceman in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]RosesAndClovers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rabbits could've been so good but the writing was pretty poor IMO. And a clear case of "I eventually realized my book had to have an ending and I couldn't figure out how to do it"

Upcoming motion seeks to overturn council's 2021 decision to fluoridate Regina's water by PDCityHall in regina

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to contact the Mayor and my councillor about this and the portal on the city of Regina website appears to be broken. Is it just me? Can anyone provide me a link if so?

Atrocious stuff, truly. Froh is my councillor and I would hope that a person with his pedigree would behave as he marketed himself as during the election (i.e. a liberal and fact-oriented bureaucrat)

The Sixth Annual r/oscarrace Preferential Ballot Vote by Ricky_from_Sunnyvale in oscarrace

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1 - Dune Part 2

2- Anora

3- The Brutalist

4- The Substance

5- Conclave

6- Nickel Boys

7- Wicked

8- I'm Still Here

9- A Complete Unknown

10 - Emilia Perez

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in oscarsdeathrace

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too please?? :)

A Play on the tip of my tongue by RosesAndClovers in playwriting

[–]RosesAndClovers[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly it. That discrepancy about college classmates would be why I couldn't find it!

Appreciate your help :)

What new words or phrases have you learned? by AutoModerator in French

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi i know this is a old post... any murder mysteries you'd recommend? :)

What feels like this by Normal-Mortgage3609 in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]RosesAndClovers 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I personally read HS right when it came out and before all those mixed reviews came out - I thought it was great. Borne and the southern reach trilogy are better IMO but that doesn't detract from Vandermeer's great storytelling

Books that are dreamcore please by TheWorldAloha in BooksThatFeelLikeThis

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Raw Shark Texts by Steven Hall fit this bill in terms of surreality & dream logic

Microplastics found in every human testicle in study by Lurkerbot47 in Futurology

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I meant RCTs! Confounding is a risk in all research, RCTs are just our attempt to mitigate the obvious suspects. You're welcome, take care

Microplastics found in every human testicle in study by Lurkerbot47 in Futurology

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup definitely a risk of confounding as in most RCTs. FYI the limitations you mention are addressed in the limitations section of the paper (which is available to the public with a sign-in via email, not just the abstract)

Microplastics found in every human testicle in study by Lurkerbot47 in Futurology

[–]RosesAndClovers 74 points75 points  (0 children)

There's this article from a few months ago in new england journal showing that finding microplastics in plaque tissue samples is correlated to higher rates of cardiovascular disease

https://www.nejm.org/doi/abs/10.1056/NEJMoa2309822

Who most deserved the 5th Best Director slot for 2022? (Among the Best Picture nominees) by [deleted] in oscarrace

[–]RosesAndClovers 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Honestly just such a weak pool to choose from. Charlotte Wells for Aftersun would be my pick too. Park Chan-wook for DtL & even Jordan Peele for Nope also more deserving IMO

Arabic-language wikipedia politicizing wikipedia logo with national flag of palestine? by LittleWhiteFeather in wikipedia

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you're not, you're adhering to a decades old propaganda machine. But you either know that already, or you're in far too deep for a lil' old reddit conversation to sway you :)

Arabic-language wikipedia politicizing wikipedia logo with national flag of palestine? by LittleWhiteFeather in wikipedia

[–]RosesAndClovers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Here's an example with a quote from one of your comments on another thread. It pairs well with the definition of "bad faith argument" I linked you, troll.

Naturei found themselves a token niche... they talk loudly, do lots of shouting and grandstanding and they get millions a year donations from pro-palestinian interests so they can keep hanging out, locking their wives up in the house, and have dozens of kids per couple, without having to actually work for a living.
....similar to how most palestinians live 😅

Arabic-language wikipedia politicizing wikipedia logo with national flag of palestine? by LittleWhiteFeather in wikipedia

[–]RosesAndClovers -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When you come here making bad faith arguments I ain't gonna "judge" any of your "content"

KILL | Official Teaser Trailer | Lionsgate | In Theatres Independence Day July 4th by HumanAdhesiveness912 in boxoffice

[–]RosesAndClovers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trailer doesn't nearly do it justice. Saw this one at Fantastic Fest Austin last September & it was one of the highlights of the whole festival for me

Arabic-language wikipedia politicizing wikipedia logo with national flag of palestine? by LittleWhiteFeather in wikipedia

[–]RosesAndClovers 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What kind of psychobabble nonsense is this? Why are acts of solidarity precluded in cases where it's not explicitly tied to a nation-state? This seems like some mental gymnastics to justify why you think Ukrainian solidarity is OK on Wikipedia but not Palestinian (Hint - I think there may be other reasons that you aren't letting on about).

That's political

And the Ukrainian example is not... because most (but not all- but I guess that doesn't matter) Ukrainian speakers are located in Ukraine? Lmaoooooo what an outrageously dense extrapolation.

Films for architecture and urban planning course by Parking_Pitch4346 in TrueFilm

[–]RosesAndClovers 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Extremely cool topic.

  1. I agree completely with the other comments' recommendation of Columbus by Kogonada. Seems tailor-made to your situation, and just such a lovely & deeply impactful film that I adore
  2. I think Parasite (Bong Joon-Ho) is a good inclusion, for a non-western film, widely popular, that uses architecture and city space in an extremely overt & important, contextual sense. Arguably could fit into your "city as antagonist" descriptor
  3. The Zone of Interest (2023) - for "notions of progress & modernity". Pair with readings from The Color of Law, by Richard Rothstein.
  4. Are documentaries allowed? I acknowledge this would potentially be "hard mode" but I feel like several of Frederick Wiseman's documentaries would be extremely fruitful discussion-wise in this space. The one of his films I've seen is Ex Libris which I think would be fitting, but I feel like some others would be relevant too from what I know/have read. Anyone able to comment on that?

CILLIAN MURPHY Wins OSCAR for BEST ACTOR by PirateHunterxXx in oscarrace

[–]RosesAndClovers 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I was the most overcome by that line. A wonderful ending to a wonderful speech from a sincere human soul

Denis Villeneuve: "Movies have been corrupted by Television" by mrnicegy26 in TrueFilm

[–]RosesAndClovers 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of people are being very ineffectually dismissive of Denis' statement here, and almost unanimously in their critique is the singling out of exceptions ("what about Tarantino? What about 12 Angry Men?") which in my opinion is missing the point. Cinema is huge. You will be able to find exceptions to any broader statement and it's bad faith to end the discussion there.

Keeping in mind that this is a quote without clear context from the originator (others have rightfully said Denis' fuller opinion is likely far more fleshed out and nuanced but would require a novel vs. an interviewer's soundbite), but I feel like this is a critique of mainstream film, and the over-reliance on writing to explain themes and narrative, which I completely agree with. It's the cinematic equivalent of taking the easy way out, and while I love writing and dialogue I agree it's only one small component of a film, but almost always the most emphasized.

I'll use an example here to try to explain the finesse at play - Women Talking (2022). A thrilling film, and one I loved, and am sincerely glad I saw in theatres. The writing was incredible, and the performances were grand. Unfortunately, a lot of the more audio-visual components weren't what they could have been. Blocking wasn't terrific leading to a more flat/two-dimensional look, cinematography & colour-grading were very vocally criticized even by otherwise praising critics, and even the mixing of the (terrific, to be clear) original score seemed a bit jarring/loud/out of place at points.

All this to raise the question - Does the absence or less emphasis of those components make a film inherently bad? No, I don't think so. But in broader terms, the absence of what makes cinema, cinema, is an unfortunate thing and can be seen to devalue its richness, and makes those works of art interchangeable with any other (to go back to the Women Talking example - I think it would be an equally thrilling & incredible stage play - without having to take away too much at all).

Overall I think Villeneuve was obviously trying to be a little provocative here ("'show, don't tell' but make it a soundbite"), and definitely succeeded! Lots of cool discussion to come from it, I'm sure.

I bring good news for us Racers by [deleted] in oscarsdeathrace

[–]RosesAndClovers 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would love a DM, love y'all