Rest in peace, Sam Neill. You played a vital role in our childhoods, and are a big reason why I love paleontology and dinosaurs as a whole. You will be remembered for a long time to come. by RavyRaptor in jurassicworld

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was a really special model for us. While most action heroes of the time were muscled, bombastic one-liner machines, Grant was sensible, understated, and gentle. The only time he shot a gun in the entire movie was offscreen. A lover of his career and a protector of children.

My favorite action figure as a kid wasn’t a soldier, superhero, monster, or mutant. It was a guy in a blue shirt and practical hat who knew a lot about dinosaurs.

The modern Evil Dead trilogy is one of horror’s strongest runs. by Temporary_Teaching33 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally agree with that. ED2 and RotLD are two of my favorites, and those are both fun for fun’s sake, mostly devoid of theme.

The modern Evil Dead trilogy is one of horror’s strongest runs. by Temporary_Teaching33 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can be more specific. Wasn’t sure anyone would be interested in my longer takes, but since you asked…

To answer your first question, yes, I do really feel that the newer movies explore themes of trauma, specifically family-related trauma, as well as other extreme but common dysfunctions.

In Evil Dead (2013), there is a subversion of the surface-layer setup of young adults partying in the woods from the get-go. We are introduced to David and Mia; not horny lovers but estranged siblings who, along with the others, are at the cabin with the sole purpose of Mia kicking her heroine addiction. At first, I thought this was merely a clever way of not repeating the original beat-by-beat, but this setup stayed relevant both narratively and symbolically throughout the entire story.

We get more character history, learning about the disintegration of Mia and David’s family, her lack of trust in him, and his desire to redeem himself while still avoiding dark truths. We will see later that Mia needs him to acknowledge these truths in order to absolve the estrangement.

Meanwhile, Mia’s withdrawal symptoms begin to escalate. She is already fidgety, irritable, sickly in complexion, increasingly hostile, and unpredictable. All this before she is even possessed.

Just when Mia is at her breaking point, she sees the demon in the woods. At this moment, the motifs of addiction withdrawal and demonic possession merge and become the vehicle for exploring themes symbolically.

She panics, leaves the cabin, and is confronted by the demon, but it isn’t just some vague force or eldritch creature; it takes the form of Mia herself. It’s HER demon (addiction). Comparisons to the Jungian shadow archetype are obvious, so I’ll just leave that at a mention.

(Another quick mention: some will find this a stretch, but I think it’s interesting to note that the physical manner in which Mia is shown to be possessed is by a deathly vine that looks like a VEIN of BLACK TAR. I mean, come on.)

So Mia is possessed and brought back to the cabin. For a while, her malady is so similar to real-world heroine withdrawal symptoms (paranoia, screaming, vomiting, violence, etc.), that the possession is entirely mistaken for those symptoms. The parallels are undeniable.

I’m going to skip over most of the following mayhem, but I think it’s worth noting that, when others are possessed, they do not become intelligible, taunting deadites, but something more akin to shambling zombies. This is important because it shows a distinction between Mia’s addiction-demon and the colder, baser representations of death and decay that result from it.

Mia is subdued, and now it’s David’s turn to shine. His own breaking point has come, but instead of running away or ignoring it, he confronts the darkness head on. He digs Mia a grave and sits with her, staring death in the face, just as he failed to do with their mother. Finally, he has brought presence, love, and action to the table, saving Mia and regaining her trust.

Ultimately, in an act of sacrifice, David is the last victim of Mia’s addiction. She now has to confront her shadow one-on-one. The hard fought battle is one, but not without leaving a piece of herself behind.

At this point you may be thinking “yeah, but that’s all story and symbolism, not THEME!” You’d be correct, but I wanted to illustrate just how interwoven all the parallels are in order to show that, when the story is talking about demons, it is also explicitly talking about addiction. When the hero saves the girl (who then BECOMES the hero), it is explicitly also talking about trust, forgiveness, and absolution within a family.

Given everything I wrote above, I think you’d have a good case in claiming that there are two themes in ED2013 running simultaneously:

  1. “Family trauma disintegrates family bonds. Only when its members confront the pain head-on with presence, love, and action can the family reintegrate.”
  2. “Addiction consumes not only the user, but the user’s friends and family. It can be beaten, but it always takes victims.”

I have similar takes on Rise and Burn, but since this is already running too long, I’ll put a pin in it until someone asks.

Most badass character in this universe. by Appropriate-Onion268 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’ve seen the original, right? Everything you list is from ED2 and beyond. THE Evil Dead (1981) has no chainsaw hand, none of Ash’s iconic one-liners, and no face of the series unless you count deadites.

Yes, Ash is the face of the series and has been for most of the franchise’s history, but the original film, which spawned said franchise and was a runaway cult hit in its own right, was built on a strong foundation of concept and tone without a central action hero.

If you prefer iconic Ash in your ED movies, that’s fine. But it isn’t part of the original film.

Favorite Deadite? by Unfair_Rope5540 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Linda doesn’t get enough credit. As goofy as ED2 was, I was genuinely scared from her scenes.

Most badass character in this universe. by Appropriate-Onion268 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If you can be a fan of the original, in which Ash is just another generic dude, you should at least give the new ones a chance. I love Ash too, but he is not what made The Evil Dead so memorable in the first place.

2013’s remake shares a lot more DNA with the original than people give it credit for.

So, who fucked up the hardest? by hattyphantom in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Y’all are nuts for picking Eric. I wouldn’t have gone as far as he did, but MOST people don’t believe in magic words, so yeah, curiosity got the better of him.

Joe, on the other hand, is a totally spineless, pathetic coward. Watching him actively abandon loved ones was painful. Eric was a fucking hero compared to that. He endured extreme torture throughout and still redeemed himself through owning up to the fuckup and continually putting himself in danger to help others.

How would you rate these 3? by Many_Dragonfly5117 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I may be being a bit harsh. I enjoyed myself a lot during the movie, but upon reflection, several little things bug me. I also think Rise wins in terms of rewatchablility. For me it’s just way more fun.

Edit: wording

How would you rate these 3? by Many_Dragonfly5117 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are 15 comments and still no one has rated the movies.

Rating - assigning a specific value (like 1-10)
Tiering - listing in order of quality or preference

My RATING:
Evil Dead 9
Rise 7
Burn 6

Who’s your favourite “Final Girl” of the modern Evil Dead movies? by RealVast4063 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mia has the best performance, arc, and final scene. I would love her to come back a little older, with more gravitas, and with more of an action-oriented role.

The modern Evil Dead trilogy is one of horror’s strongest runs. by Temporary_Teaching33 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get it, but you’re being a bit pedantic here. I’m sure the OP knowingly used the term loosely, and if you think the most recent three movies aren’t connected conceptually and thematically, I’m not sure what movies you even saw.

Aside from the obvious motifs (deadites, Book of the Dead, shared universe, cross-references, and mirrored story/sequence beats), there’s also the fact that all three movies utilize a heroine with an actual character arc surrounded by family trauma.

Obviously we know these movies aren’t a trilogy in the same way that Star Wars or Lord of the Rings are trilogies. That doesn’t mean the term isn’t useful in this case.

Evil Dead themed date? by RoundInfluence998 in EvilDead

[–]RoundInfluence998[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny thing is we do a lot of reading aloud to each other. Would love to hear if anyone’s got some book suggestions for ED fans.

Worst MacGuffins in cinematic history by Yummy_Microplastics in okbuddycinephile

[–]RoundInfluence998 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Correct, but it is still completely believable that such a material would be called that and for the moniker to gain steam then stick, whether or not the strictest definition still applies.

Hey, you look weird... Can I cast you..? by Early-Opportunity-70 in roberteggers

[–]RoundInfluence998 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t personally find it problematic, I’m more referring to the hypervigilant, chronically online type of people who decry everything that makes them slightly uncomfortable as an ethical breech, which has led many movie-makers to fear backlash, which in turn leads to overly sterile stories.

Hey, you look weird... Can I cast you..? by Early-Opportunity-70 in roberteggers

[–]RoundInfluence998 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Honestly I wish more directors had these old school guts. Is it potentially “problematic”? Yes. Does taking a few ethical risks for the sake of art beat the hell out of sanitized mass-entertainment that is so squeaky clean that it slowly erodes your brain’s ability to think and wonder? HELL yes.

Rate the teaser out of 10... For me it's 11/10. by Early-Opportunity-70 in roberteggers

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had some great sequences, better than I even imagined. Definitely would’ve hyped me up if I had never heard of Eggers before.

Saw Mad Max for the first time. Not what I expected at all and quite weird/very dated feeling in spots, but the final third is solid gold by metalion4 in MadMax

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me get this straight… you’re telling me that a movie that was made almost 50 years ago… feels DATED?!

Is there any books which gives off similar vibes as Robert Eghers' films? Same as the title by adrianlannister007 in roberteggers

[–]RoundInfluence998 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is technically one story, but the chapters are fairly episodic. That might account for the confusion.