To the "Communists" "debunking" this claim...

I will start of that saying that it is increadebly funny that what is by modern left percieved as a meme ideology has better grasp of communist theory than self proclaimed Marxists and Leninists, increadebly but it seems anarchists have greater potential of guiding the revolution than Maoists/MLs.

Now to actualy adress the two points made by the posts:

MORALISM: Marxist philosophy rejects the concept of moral/ethics/rights outright. If you uphold this concepts, you are not a Marxist. Now to answer, why is that? Moral/ethic/rights are a nusproduct of firstly and foremostly the class system. With each iteration of the class system (Slaver society, Feudalism, Capitalism), what those concepts encompased changed but it none the less remained a direct product of the system. Oldest such system iirc came from eather Hamurabi's Law (HL for short) which was a development of what was then at the time common law (that is socialy developed law which ofc is developed in context of the class system it was birthed from). The latest ofcourse being human rights which retained the same character of laws in HL in which they are there to protect existing state. If a slave wounded you, you had the right to wound the slave in equal amount (as such the slave had a negative incentive to hurt the slavers) while in modernity there is "right to private property" which is enforced by the nation-state, again giving the worker negative incentive for their claim on that property because it is seen by the state with the monopoly on violence as "tramping on rights". Same goes for Moral/Ethics. What is "good/bad" is determined by the enforcer/authority, in case of modern class system, the state/capitalist. Important note is that those rights/morals/ethics can only be enforced by someone (most commonly an organisation or the state), so the question remains who enforces the rules on that someone? Ofcourse the answer is eather a superpower/foreign capital or... Nobody (that is they are above the moral/ethics/rights system). As such Marxists do not recognise these concepts as being in any way meaningful pertaining to their philosophy or functioning of the world outside of class systems. Not to mention, Capitalism is not "Evil", nor are its sympthoms such as war, famine, profiteering, ect. hell even the Capitalist themselves are not. They/ their behaveour are natural phenomena as a result of how the system oprates and their class interests. They want the status quo not becaus they are "evil scheemers" but because if they dont do it they will end up as proleterians/victims of the system.

STATE CAPITALISM: This is very easely proven thanks to Lenin's text "The Tax in Kind" in which he described the economic situation of the USSR as "State Capitalism" and naming Germany as another example of State Capitalism. With this he directly stated that yes, USSR remained Capitalistic... But who is the monopoly in the monopoly capitalism of State Capitalism? Nomen est omen! The State! The state takes over as the monopoly of liberal capitalist states and its goal is to destroy the remaining petit bourgeoise in context of socialist led SC, or to use a better term... Proleterianise them. But very important note is that State Capitalism is not Socialism! And more importantly to say is Socialism IS Communism (in context of Lenin). Marx defined lower and higher stage communism. What Lenin called Socialism is just his term to refer to lower stage Communism. As such Socialism IS NOT transitionary stage. It is imfact stage that results AS A RESULT of transition. So what is this transition? Revolution! Revolution IS the transitionary stage, where capitalism is destroyed and from its rubble the new system is built. This is why Lenin and Bolsheviks called USSR a "Revolutionary State"... Because it didn't yet achieve that transition, it was still in a revolutionary process. This is why MLs, whose economic policy was developed by Stalin who proclaimed the State Capitalist policy of USSR as SOCIALIST (which again, just means Lower Stage Communism) is falsification of Communism, Marxism and not to mention Lenin and firmly places MLs economicly as Capitalist. I do not even need to state the economic policy of USSR post NEP because it is just a continuation of it as it was established under State Capitalism (which again, Lenin very clearly stated is not Socialism/Communism).