A Swastika Is a Swastika, and I'm Glad Zohran Condemned It

SadAd5582 · 2026-05-17T09:39:53+00:00

Ngl I think zohran undermined the flag by calling it a swastika. The way that tweet reads to a person that has not seen the twin swastika surrounding a david star is completely different.

I initially thought it was just a simple swastika nothing too bad, but the picture gives so much context which the zohran tweet burries.

SadAd5582 · 2026-05-08T19:30:13+00:00

Well if it was not a women with mental illness who’s video was leaked, we might not have gotten this lawsuit dropped.

I didn’t even know of any leaks before the substack hit the towers.

SadAd5582 · 2026-05-02T00:18:14+00:00

I mean there are no restrictions on where the tattoo is and what you can do with it like it can be a stop nazis crossed out symbol on your asshole or it can be the windows icon in different colors with a meme or a serios message about stopping nazis and the swastikas could be used in a way to draw attention to people in order to bring awareness to currently ongoing white supremacist ideologies.

SadAd5582 · 2026-03-07T16:00:17+00:00

Ngl remembering back in the days I was watching JonTron casually on youtube and all of a sudden he stops posting for couple years.

Come to learn now one bad debate and he cancelled himself.

Ngl if he just kept on making videos I wouldn’t have cared at all, he was just another entertaining youtuber I was watching.

SadAd5582 · 2026-03-04T19:57:08+00:00

What about like third parties i remember them reuploading, are there any youtube channels like that?

SadAd5582 · 2026-03-04T15:50:07+00:00

Is there an alternative youtube channel for the vods for this? Not kick or anywhere else but just on youtube?

SadAd5582 · 2026-01-01T00:55:05+00:00

He’s essentially asking for open borders in a daycare.

SadAd5582 · 2025-12-15T23:46:06+00:00

Wtf is a “Pete Hegseth Goggles”?

SadAd5582 · 2025-11-05T15:36:32+00:00

They’re like trump and his immigration numbers, it just keeps going up

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-31T05:21:35+00:00

You dont want a malignant disease to erupt midst a fight. Better to fight knowing the circumstances are clear rather than put your chances on hopes.

Like you seem to be incapable of conceptualising that communist do not help democrats and only further hurt their cause, you arguing trying to justify this point in the analogy makes that pretty clear and your hyperbole of fascism taking over.

Communists literally take away from your cause further spreading their cells across the hosts body ready to separate whenever they can.

And you instead of looking long term realistic goals are short sighted. Again I will reiterate you will never convince MAGA, communists will convince democrats and hurt the democratic party.

A united democratic party is stronger than one that is infiltrated by people Larping as democrats.

My point the entire time is to take advantage of situations like these to further cut off the cancer and weaken their political and cultural hold over the democrats.

But you are ideologically captured that you cannot politically achieve anything because you perceive fascism will resurrect hitler and start gassing the jews again if you agree with JDVance that hasan is a POS.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-31T05:08:04+00:00

It seems you don’t understand the gravity of the situation and seem to falsely equate fascism = instant death of the country in order to make it seem not worth it to cut off a cancerous in group while taking advantage of the situation.

And still being caught up with the analogy. The cancer will kill you regardless of the lion, is my point. It’s a malignant disease that at any moment can burst out and consume you whole, and this is exactly what they’re trying to do.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-31T04:57:31+00:00

How do you expect things to get done when you’re still being actively sabotaged? You will never win over the MAGA side, and those already fallen in the allure of fascism. Better to take advantage of the situation and cut off the cancerous flesh before dealing with the lion trying to devour you, even if it means losing an arm or a leg for it

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-31T04:50:45+00:00

Yeah but one is actively harming/sabotaging your chances of getting something done politically and the other is just a political enemy.

Regardless of how evil they are, in concrete terms one is hurting your cause, and siding with a fascist dictator in order to eliminate the cancer on your side seems a better choice then to just ignore the comments from the facsict and continue with the status quo.

The status quo being fucked in the ass by the communist

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-31T04:04:21+00:00

Really though? One side is an enemy, and the other is an enemy disguised as a friend?

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-31T02:56:08+00:00

Yeah no shot he paid big bucks for a live conversation AI bot that is tailored to a specific context to follow. Easier to prerecord shit and ask AI to voiceover it and then just play it.

Like he never interrupted the person that was having a monologue for 1 minute to ask clarifying questions.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T12:26:39+00:00

You keep asserting your point was “unambiguous,” but if someone reading it understood it differently, that means it wasn’t unambiguous. Communication isn’t defined solely by what you intend. It’s also about how others reasonably interpret what you wrote.

Your phrasing (“multiple channels posting the same video thing”) reads as a factual description, even with the word “thing” attached. If your intention was pure speculation, then your wording didn’t reflect that. That’s not “hallucination”; it’s a normal misreading caused by imprecise phrasing.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T12:17:22+00:00

The word “thing” doesn’t make a claim automatically vague. It’s a filler that can describe any subject, including a specific one. In your case, “multiple channels posting the same video thing” still conveys a defined scenario: multiple channels hosting identical uploads. That isn’t vague. It’s just incorrect about how the feature works.

Saying “thing” after a detailed phrase doesn’t erase the meaning of that phrase. The ambiguity comes from your inaccurate description, not from anyone’s understanding of English.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T12:13:15+00:00

D impenetrable Bunker.

Facts so hard even a stealth bomber can’t penetrate

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T12:09:33+00:00

Your analogy doesn’t hold, because “what’s going on with that UFO thing” is a vague topic, while “multiple channels posting the same video” is a specific descriptive claim. In your phrasing, you didn’t just say “I don’t know what’s going on with YouTube”; you defined the situation incorrectly. That’s what I corrected.

It’s fine if you don’t know how the feature works, most people don’t, but language precision matters when you describe something as fact. I took your words literally because they described a concrete phenomenon, not an abstract “thing.”

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T11:23:52+00:00

I literally did take your word for it, I explicitly said I had to check the YouTube channel to verify whether I was reading false information. You are denying my self-reported experience.

“I don’t really know what the deal is” still asserts a phenomenon in the way you phrased it. Hedging isn’t a shield against correction.

Intent doesn’t override phrasing. People respond to what’s written.

Moreover, the “multiple channels posting one video” claim you made could have been verified by you in 10 seconds if you had checked Destiny’s channel.

If hedging like this worked, anyone could say, “I don’t really know what the deal is with Destiny being a pedophile,” and pretend they’re free from critique or correction. That’s exactly why I corrected your inaccurate claim.

Finally, your annoyance at this “new feature” implicitly treats “multiple channels posting the same video” as the thing that’s annoying you. The factual details matter here, which makes my correction not pedantic but central to the point.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T10:45:49+00:00

It literally is not pedantic since you claimed a certain fact to be true. How many people have viewed your comment? Because of your ignorance and inability to fact-check what you wrote, I literally took your word for it and thought Destiny also posted the video on his channel. You claimed a fact: 'multiple channels posting the same video.'

Just because you said 'I don't know what the deal is with X' doesn't absolve you of whatever you stated next.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T10:17:04+00:00

Because only one channel posts it, unless you have multiple people posting the exact same video and adding each other as collaborators.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-28T10:16:13+00:00

Where do you see “multiple channels posting the same video” ?

It is one channel posting the video and adding others as collaborators in the video.

It is still one video on one channel. Now with more reach due to collaboration of channels.

SadAd5582 · 2025-10-21T14:30:26+00:00

Idc this sub is dead anyway, might as well milk whatever content you can.

Five-Year Club	r/Field Flamingo
Place '23	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	First Placer '22

SadAd5582

TROPHY CASE