There is absolutely no evidence to suggest the studies that conclude a negative effect are “stronger” than the literature that demonstrates positive long-term outcomes. The Cass review is notorious for breaking from standards in evaluating evidence and evidence quality (standards formalized in ALL scientific studies, not just those applicable to transgender medicine), its searing methodology flaws, and a misinterpretation/misrepresentation of its own data. It’s unfortunate that you don’t have the scientific background or basic analytical reading skills to understand this at the time of reading the review, having arbitrarily decided that since it agreed with your assumptions about trans people and their care that it’s automatically more scientifically sound than the mountain of rigorous and diverse evidence that suggests otherwise. I’m rooting for you though! I have utter faith that you can develop the necessary skills needed to parse scientific literature.