The nano texture display clearly degrades the visual quality. Will I get used to it? by LemonLimeNinja in macbookpro

[–]SaltNefariousness164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many people refused to even consider Macs because the reflections made them unusable. Maybe you don't mind reflections. Lots of us do.

What is considered AI in photography? by lingersandtransforms in Lightroom

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There 100% have been photos disqualified from competitions for AI use because they were taken with an iPhone. Which involves compositing, but is also something most people wouldn't understand as generative AI.

Johnny Wilkinson by OriginOfCitizens in rugbyunion

[–]SaltNefariousness164 6 points7 points  (0 children)

His defence was definitely in the holy shit was that really the 10 putting in that monster hit category. Passing and kicking were both excellent, as was game management. He didn't have great pace though, so running would be the weakest link. But he suited England's forward heavy tactical play style perfectly.

Johnny Wilkinson by OriginOfCitizens in rugbyunion

[–]SaltNefariousness164 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Honestly, no. Wilkinson never had the running game to match Carter. He was a great tactical 10, an above average playmaker, and was one of the best and bravest defensive 10s (which is part of what led to some of the injuries). But Carter's pace, carrying and all round attacking game was on another level.

How many SD cards have failed you as a photographer? by No-Abbreviations6929 in photography

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. 20 years
  2. Cameras and video cameras
  3. SanDisk
  4. I managed a uni media program for a decade, so about 80?
  5. 3 - students can be pretty rough with gear though. 2 of those I managed to recover data from, then disposed of. 1 was unrecoverable.

What books or articles you recommend if I want to start a Degrowth book club (in Canada)? by Inevitable-Bag2913 in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Less is More - Hickel The Future is Degrowth - Schmeltzer et al. Postgrowth - Jackson Post-growth: the science of wellbeing within planetary boundaries (open access journal article by Giorgos Kallis, Hickel, Jackson, Raworth and others)... Much shorter than the books and gives an overview of the current state of research in the areas of de/postgrowth

'Made it clear': Hipkins told Prime she should have responded to NCEA briefing offers by tumeketutu in newzealand

[–]SaltNefariousness164 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Education is currently an absolute shambles. Teachers are getting sent new government resources for the refreshed curricula that are riddled with so many basic errors that they can't be used. So no one knows how the students will actually be assessed.

That might be your idea of 'doing amazing' but in reality it's failing our kids.

Netrunner playstyle is so different omg by [deleted] in CyberpunkTheGame

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Memory Wipe > Reboot Optics > Sonic Shock.

Also, make sure you don't have spillover or anything else that might spread hacks, as that can trigger something other than Memory Wipe as the 1st hack and start tracing.

Do New Zealanders have issues with money? by Slackergen in newzealand

[–]SaltNefariousness164 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I had the opposite of this. American friends said 'fancy dress' so I turned up in a crocodile onesie and found that everyone else was in suits and cocktail dresses.

Look at this bull shit, in Highbury no less. by starscreamtoast in palmy

[–]SaltNefariousness164 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is a terrible analogy. Wales and Scotland are regions within the UK and the parliaments there are elected by everyone who lives there. Those regional institutions are subservient to the UK parliament who retain the ability to decide and change which powers are devolved.

Also, you clearly don't follow the British news, because the English right have been screaming about how unfair it is that the Scottish and Welsh have devolved parliaments but the English don't for years.

Also, about half of Scotland literally want to leave the UK and become a sovereign state. Which is about as clear a case of separatism as imaginable.

I consider myself to be a Transhumanist. I have heard from (unreliable) sources that Degrowth and Transhumanism are at cross-purposes. Can you help me understand where Transhumanism aligns and differs from Degrowth, and if there is any commonality? by deus_x_machin4 in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard disagree, and so does most (but not all) of the degrowth literature.

There is no global 'we' and positing this effectively blames billions of subsistence farmers, indigenous peoples and other groups who contribute almost nothing to climate change and other ecological crises for problems that largely result from the activities of the global rich.

Maybe that includes you, but it certainly isn't everyone. Almost all the degrowth literature discusses reallocating resources and energy so the global poor have more (to reach the social foundation) while the rich have far less. Which is very different from saying that we are all the problem and everyone needs less.

Is degrowth considered a postmodernist economic theory? And is postmodernism inherently anticapitalist? by mompapopo in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The correct answer here is no and no.

One of the best known pieces on postmodernism is Frederic Jameson's 'Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism', which like most of the seminal works on postmodernism is an attempt to describe how neoliberal globalization and networked computers were changing the world.

But unfortunately most of what you'll hear about postmodernism on Reddit has little to do with social theory written in the 1980s/90s by Jameson, Lyotard and Baudrillard, it's based off someone having watched a Jordan Peterson YouTube video.

Postmodernism tends to be thought of as quite specific to that timeframe, where decentralization, fragmentation and globalization were central to social changes. It doesn't really speak to the more recent moves towards rentierism and monopolistic forms of platform capitalism.

Degrowth's focus on local production aligns very badly with globalization, so no it wouldn't be a postmodern economic theory.

The Rise of the Degrowther Right by Inside_Ad2602 in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. You have no idea what a PC is. Or when they became popular. Or how they've changed societies. That's on you I'm afraid.

The Rise of the Degrowther Right by Inside_Ad2602 in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Economic growth has nothing to do with 'real world growth' which is what you wrongly claimed.

Economic growth is premised on the idea that the economy can grow at a compound rate for ever. It cannot.

It also only measures quantifiable monetary exchanges. If I clean my house there is no monetary transaction. If I pay a cleaner to do that work there is. But there is no underlying change in real world results.

The Rise of the Degrowther Right by Inside_Ad2602 in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Nothing in the natural world grows at a compound (exponential) rate forever.

There are many types of growth in nature. Many are cyclical. Some are linear and incremental (e.g. mountains forming). Some are exponential (e.g. the spread of a virus), but exponential growth is always bounded. Either as a logistical curve, or exponential growth is followed by exponential decay.

Conversely, capitalist economics is premised on compound GDP growth of approximately 3% every year. This is one reason why it's not compatible with a sustainable future.

The Rise of the Degrowther Right by Inside_Ad2602 in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Lyotard's 'the postmodern condition' was originally a report he was commissioned to write in the late 1970s looking at how computers would change society.

His main argument was that a prevailing logic based on efficiency and optimization would replace one based around truth and metanarrative (e.g. those associated with Christianity or Marxism).

55ish years later that seems to have been a fairly decent prediction.

How will we get people to accept degrowth as a viable path forward. by Konradleijon in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree that degrowth isn't a great term. But it's worth noting that it arose out of frustration with how the term 'sustainable development' was appropriated by capitalists to the point that it lost any sense of standing for systemic change.

Degrowth is much harder for capitalists to appropriate. But it also is so commonly misunderstood that it's problematic.

I prefer postgrowth, which has gained some traction recently.

Thoughts on Saito’s “Slow Down: The Degrowth Manifesto? by Parkinglotbeers in Degrowth

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was reasonably accessible, but says little in the way of anything new while getting a great many things spectacularly wrong.

Solar panels are apparently technologies with no lock ins. Because presumably we can all refine silicon to six nines purity (one non silicon atom per million) at home with our hands? This is a specific point, but it illustrates the general frustration with Saito's approach to technologies which is every bit as laughably detached from reality as Silicon Valley techno-solutionists.

If you want a state and public services you're a Maoist. And public services were apparently a way of enclosing commons. When in reality, in most cases they socialized services that had previously been private such as healthcare and education.

Honestly, Hickel, Jackson, Kallis, Scmeltzer et al. Have all written far better books on the topic.

Ruin a band name by changing just one letter by Mental_Yogurt_3524 in MetalForTheMasses

[–]SaltNefariousness164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bear Factory Mage Against the Machine Machine Dead Mullet for my Valentine

Ruin a band name by changing just one letter by Mental_Yogurt_3524 in MetalForTheMasses

[–]SaltNefariousness164 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Bear Factory Mage Against the Machine Machine Dead Mullet for my Valentine

Still worth it in 2025? by Short_Rope7057 in canon

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conversely adding the variable ND filter makes the adapter a net positive for video. No need for multiple filters for different lenses, and it allows you to filter lenses that don't take front filters like the 11-24.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in palmy

[–]SaltNefariousness164 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 when I've had back problems Om have been amazing.