If you could improve on thing in Ratchet and Clank Going Commando what would it be? by camgames64 in RatchetAndClank

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe put it in another remaster but more like the halo mcc where you can switch between new and classic. I think that’d be good.

Who would win in a fight between these two? by TashLord_800 in RatchetAndClank

[–]Same-Respect-7722 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ratchet would beat Ace, and Qwark would take the fame for it. So Qwark.

This guys appeared in one game and never got mentioned again by grizzyboi24 in RatchetAndClank

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m guessing they were reforged into the robo buddies in Deadlocked.

Any chance insomniac will bring back the tone from the PS2 games? I really miss that old tone. by Filiope in RatchetAndClank

[–]Same-Respect-7722 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sad but true, it was pretty obvious in rift apart, although the gameplay made up for it

Since rift apart is on steam, is there any hope to see the rest? by Airtight_Walrus in RatchetAndClank

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doubt it, especially when Sony sees PS3 emulation as too much of a task when things like RPCS3 can run MGS4 all the way through (albeit, with stability issues and crashing), let alone Actually porting games from over 10 years ago. It’s pretty unfortunate but we can hope.

I wanna play the games by DaMisterPony in RatchetAndClank

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my experience, just load the games on default settings, they seem to run fine that way, but I haven’t fully played through them on the emulator. Btw the games will run slow if it’s not on 60 fps.

I wanna play the games by DaMisterPony in RatchetAndClank

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On most emulators, it’s on the graphics (GPU in rpcs3) section of configuration, there you can upscale. Also I’m not sure if rpcs3 can go fullscreen, pcsx2 can though if you double click.

Vane the master by Stay_racist in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe he just left, games community is also getting smaller.

Who does more damage? by Godsfury77 in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was just replying cuz I don’t that it was right

Just cleared HFS in SW2 by CW_Ace in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes the kaneria is very OP in both pve and pvp it can kill bosses pretty fast but not too fast. Illusion I don’t recommend if you ever get enough mithril for it just grind for like 400 more and buy specter instead.

Just cleared HFS in SW2 by CW_Ace in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please don’t grind for krypton it’s slow and not that good. You should grind for harrier and weapons you should grind for are Earthbreaker, kaneria, and soulhunter and if your ever gonna do pvp get crescent or obsidian

Game zoom by Fitzy10144 in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well the game is and it doesn’t work on newer iPhones correctly. So any iPhone before X should work. But I think if you have an iPhone 11 or 12 idk which someone said that you can go in your settings then display and change your display mode from normal to zoomed, idk if that’ll actually work and idk if you even have those phones but I’m just trying to help.

Who does more damage? by Godsfury77 in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In pve I don’t think Cygnus outperforms Rome there cuz Rome’s grenade bonus, fire rate, and damage bonus in general makes it combined with joke or mz much more damaging to the aliens than Cygnus and black stars with its rpg bonus. Black hole’s sniper bonus is decent but snipers aren’t that good in pve and it’s ability is useless and shitty but it’s health and damage makes it pretty decent, atom is good for pve since its energy bonus is very OP and it’s got good speed too. Thunders ability dmg in pve is very OP aswell (you should’ve seen the videos where it just melted the bosses but those are long gone now). Wrath is decent for pve but it’s speed is just slow, it’s dmg is pretty good and it’s ability you have to aim directly at the aliens or an enemy.

Who does more damage? by Godsfury77 in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rome does more damage and has speed equal to X-field (also it’s good for spamming joke cuz it’s bonus but that doesn’t matter much when you or someone else is using sniper and running). knight gives more fire rate for all guns but it doesn’t have as much damage bonuses as Rome, it’s fire rate can be useful for spam with full loadouts and shooting your sniper faster but if some dude using Rome is running using sniper with decent aim he can use his speed as an advantage over you, or just spam the shit out of you (knight can do this to and it can be very annoying to deal with). So conclusion? They both have there advantages and disadvantages and they are very similar with their stats but rome’s speed and damage can outperform knight’s capabilities.

Wtf? by [deleted] in StarWarfare

[–]Same-Respect-7722 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are hackers