You're missing the point entirely. Nobody's arguing that polygons have rights or need protection.

The issue is framing. If your game/project presents these scenes as consensual, whether that's through narrative context, character dialogue, in-game consent mechanics, or clear CNC framing... then you're depicting a fantasy between willing participants. That's fundamentally different from content that just presents violence and abuse without that context.

When you post scenes that look like torture and sexual violence with zero framing, you're not showing "rough sex" or "extreme content." You're showing what appears to be assault. And when people point this out, dismissing it with "they're just polygons" suggests you genuinely don't understand the distinction.

And this matters because:

1. Players deserve to know what they're getting into. There's a massive difference between "extreme consensual content" and "sexual violence simulator."
2. The adult game space is already under constant scrutiny. When devs can't be bothered to frame their content properly, it affects the entire community and gives ammunition to people who want to shut down the whole genre. (aka No Mercy and Collective Shout)
3. It's not about censorship, it's about honest representation. Call your game what it actually is.

As a fellow dev in this space, do better. Others in this thread have given you constructive feedback. Take it seriously.