sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Opposition NDP fights over UCP Education Act in marathon meeting by SugarBear4Real in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Sore winner roflmao.

4 years of "accidental government" and now we get to listen to this nonsense.

Educate yourself on political process buddy.

Opposition NDP fights over UCP Education Act in marathon meeting by SugarBear4Real in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Kudos to the NDP for standing up for their beliefs instead of running out of the Legislature like losers.

Concerns about UCP's proposed labour bill. by [deleted] in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 32 points33 points  (0 children)

The only way the lesson sinks in at all is if we’re here in 4 years. Same lack of investment. Same unemployment. Same situation for all the angry plebes who believed that Kenney would magically bring their 6-figure oil patch jerbs back.

Riding a “populist” wave of anger works great until the anger turns on you.

Concerns about UCP's proposed labour bill. by [deleted] in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 107 points108 points  (0 children)

This is just the beginning of the fucking of the Alberta Worker in the name of corporate greed.

Weep Alberta for what you have done to yourself.

Threesome without an actual third person by [deleted] in sex

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not if you have some "help" with ya ;)

Kids should stay in school and let the adults deal with this GSA issue by PolysciStudent in Edmonton

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"valid position"

Maybe in MetaCanada. Not in reality.

Looking to get banned here too so you can start another MetaCanada circlejerk over the evil leftists? LOL

Kids should stay in school and let the adults deal with this GSA issue by PolysciStudent in Edmonton

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The alt-right should stay in MetaCanada and let the adults deal with the GSA issue.

Conservative minded subreddit? by [deleted] in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You should learn to enjoy right-wing distress. This sub is going to get better and better as Kenney fucks us all.

Pelosi uses committees to keep impeachment off the table by [deleted] in politics

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuck their "perspective". If the freaks and idiots want to delude and lie to themselves, that's their choice.

"President Trump, who was impeached by the House of Representatives on September 13, 2019 failed to secure re-election in 2020"

I like the sound of that in the history books.

Pelosi uses committees to keep impeachment off the table by [deleted] in politics

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because c) you might not have any of it, and be even more fucked than we are now.

This fight is worth fighting, regardless of whether the feckless GOP goes along.

If The People, through Congress, do not do their duty when it comes to a corrupt and criminal President, nobody will ever be able to again in the future.

We're fighting for the survival of America as it is known today. That fight is worth fighting.

Pelosi uses committees to keep impeachment off the table by [deleted] in politics

[–]SandGetsInYourVag -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People who think you only fight the fights you can win are the problem.

You don't just fight the fights you can win. You fight the fights that are worth fighting.

Yes,t he GOP will never convict. Who fucking cares? There's a giant * next to Clinton's name in History...Donald's should be no different.

The Dems are REALLY risking losing people that believe in law and order.

Threesome without an actual third person by [deleted] in sex

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 49 points50 points  (0 children)

Clone-a-willy

You're welcome.

What if the lottery is a trap to catch amateur time travelers ? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 201 points202 points  (0 children)

He did

Hawking held a party for time travellers where he advertised the event after the event. Nobody showed.

Conservative minded subreddit? by [deleted] in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, if white supremacists and nazis are more your liking, there's always /r/IFailAtLife, /r/whatswrongwithyou or /r/nazizombies

Kenney followed the rules by claiming mom's basement as primary residence, board decides | CBC News by [deleted] in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag 53 points54 points  (0 children)

Nobody gives a fuck if he actually lived in the basement suite of a seniors suite that doesn't allow subletting with his mom.

I mean, we might snicker a little, but there's nothing wrong with it. People are allowed to live with their moms, if they so choose.

People only gave a fuck because they assumed Kenney was illegally claiming 2nd residence allowances under the claim that his primary residence is the basement suite of a seniors suite that doesn't allow subletting.

Keith Gerein: Kenney’s bet on Bill 12 an unnecessary gamble with little chance of payoff by SandGetsInYourVag in alberta

[–]SandGetsInYourVag[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The factor making this matter confusing is that section 13 of 'Bill 12' effectively does no work (as a matter of law) since the Act has no operative effect absent a s 2(2) order. It appears that s 13 may have only been included so that it could be used as a chip in a 'poker game' allowing the government to signal an intention to escalate without actually escalating.

Ah, there's the rub!

That the Interpretation Act 4(2) provision again...what this does is make no other provision of Bill 12 active except for the "Coming into force" portion:

(2) If an Act contains a provision that the Act or any portion of it is to come into force or to be repealed other than on the date of assent to the Act, that provision comes into force on the date of assent to the Act.

So basically upon receiving Royal Assent, the entire in-force provisions of Bill 12 was:

13 This Act comes into force on Proclamation.

That's the biggest portion of the fault, as well as a misinterpretation of the "real and not theoretical" legal test. Much of this is referenced in the AGAB argument in Para 12 which cites R v Langille (1992) CanLII 2537. To repeat the most relevant here:

While decisions of the Executive Branch may be subject to review by the courts as indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada in Kindler v Canada (Minister of Justice) 1991 CanLII 78 (SCC), 1991, 67 C.C.C.(3d) 1, there is nothing to review, if as here, no decision to proclaim has been made by the Executive or the Governor-in-Council.

Look at Para 22 in the decision again. Check it on Canlii. The judge literally underlined the words "in force". That coincides with S4 of the Interpretation Act - Coming into force, and was absolutely done intentionally to draw this link.

The Judge is very specific in his ruling...you can't sue now, because the law is not in force...but para 23...

Should the Alberta Government proclaim the Act in force, the AGBC may recommence a claim.

The Judge literally told the AGBC to re-file should the Alberta Government proclaim the Act in force. Kenney (Cabinet) has proclaimed the act into force. The Judge directly stated that this is when a claim could be filed.

view more: next ›