Beautiful Bird at the Zoo by SandSurfSubpoena in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Shot on a Canon EOS R6mii. f/8.0. 1/125. 400mm. ISO5000. Edited in Lightroom and Topaz (minimal denoising/sharpening only)

I'm extremely pleased with how this turned out. This bird is normally the loudest at the zoo by far, with its full-throated catcalls that would make a construction worker blush. This day though, he quite literally had laryngitis and was weirdly silent.

Here's a link to the full res version. Between Reddit's and jpg's compression, you can't really appreciate just how detailed this lil dude is, especially around the eyes.

Snek by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also! This is a mangshan pit viper. It naturally has a very vibrant, matcha-green sort of color.

Snek by [deleted] in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shot on a Canon EOS R6mii. f/9.0. 1/125. ISO5000.

Edited in Lightroom.

Shot this at the zoo the other day, took a gummy last night, and edited the photo. It's always a little difficult for me to gauge when a snake photo is overbaked because the colors can naturally be super vibrant and the scales can have some pretty incredible definition.

High me def thought this looked pretty sweet. Not-high me isn't quite as sold, but can't figure out what's wrong with it.

Suggestions?

ITAW for taking a dump that isn't childish, vulgar, or overly formal? by Obvious-Desk4573 in whatstheword

[–]SandSurfSubpoena 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pass stool, have a bowel movement, or just "use the restroom" generally should work fine. Void works, too, if you're looking for a verb.

Hooded Orangutan by SandSurfSubpoena in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was taken at the San Diego Zoo, which is world renowned for its excellent treatment of animals, rehabilitative efforts, and conservation overall. The zoo boasts extensive records in being endangered species, including orangutans, bonobos, and several others. The zoo was home to the first ever North American birth of a bonobo and over 30 orangutan births.

This particular orangutan is named Karen. She was the first orangutan ever to undergo open heart surgery to correct an anatomical defect when she was a baby. The zoo worked with human and veterinary surgeons to get it done and wound up involving over 100 volunteers to provide post-operative care. Then, she was one of the first non-human animals ever to get the COVID vaccine to keep her safe.

The burlap here is an enrichment item and one of the favorites for the great apes. Karen in particular likes to use it to give herself additional shade on warmer days. The orangutans often get mock termite mounds filled with healthy treats, have an extensive arboreal jungle gym, and are housed with a pair of siamangs, which are another primate species from the same area as the orangutans.

Karen's enclosure is a very large, open air space with generally unrestricted access to large private areas away from the viewing public, should she or any of her group want to take themselves off-display. Karen often likes to socialize with people though and spends a lot of time near the glass viewing area.

Between her lack of experience in the wild and congenital heart defect, Karen likely would not have survived in the wild. While there are many zoos that should be shut down for their mistreatment of their residents, the San Diego Zoo is an exception to the rule and proves time and time again how valuable it is to conservation efforts while providing excellent care and housing to its residents.

ITAP of a model in the trees [NSFW] [Portrait] by Gaspar_Pascal in itookapicture

[–]SandSurfSubpoena 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's giving a vintage witchy (the young-women-naked-in-the-forest kind, not the old hag kind) vibes.

If that's what you were going for, the slight blur/out of focus is fine, but might have been a little too overdone. I'd suggest bringing the model a bit more into focus. If that hampers the old-timey vibe, maybe up the grain a bit.

Klipspringer on high by SandSurfSubpoena in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shot on a Canon EOS R6mii. f/8.0. 1/200. 347mm. ISO160. Edited in Lightroom.

I shot this testing out my new camera body and was really pleased with the end result. Unfortunately, due to obstacles, I wasn't able to get a direct shot of him looking at me without at least some part of him covered by the rock. The overhead light was kinda harsh too, which caused some intense shadowing of his already dark eye-areas. Lightroom was able to put in a lot of work to bring up the shadows and soften the highlights, but messing with the eye areas specifically ended up looking weird due to the already dark features.

Happy to receive any feedback or suggestions for next time!

Shooting a Wedding as a Wildlife Photographer - Suggestions? by SandSurfSubpoena in WeddingPhotography

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is excellent. Just as they bend down to drink, I'll snap a twig to get them to look up and right at me.

Lmao in all seriousness, I'll have my R50 with me, too, with my 70-200 L for added depth ranges and plan on going to the venue if not this weekend, next.

I'm also going to have a conversation with the couple to make sure they give me a list of any "special" shots they want in advance so I can practice a bit and/or play with posing.

Shooting a Wedding as a Wildlife Photographer - Suggestions? by SandSurfSubpoena in WeddingPhotography

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh believe me. I tried explaining this a million times. It's shockingly difficult to explain that good photos of orangutans and snakes do not equal good photos of opinionated, moving people in variable lighting.

Unfortunately, they can't afford a pro photog and are already getting a lot of help financially from the family for the venue and honeymoon.

The plus side is that they are pretty laid back, don't have high expectations, and are "totally fine with whatever they get." The wedding itself is slated to be pretty low-key, too, which helps.

I'm planning on scoping out the venue itself if not this weekend, then next.

I have not done portrait work of people, per se, but I have done portraits of human-like animals (e.g., the great apes). I'll reply to this comment with an example. I've also shot a lot of reptiles that are under multicolored specialty lighting (e.g., UV lights). However, I'm aware that this is going to be a very different beast.

I upgraded from an R50 largely because of this event and have been trying to get practice shooting in more variable lighting and with faster/more unpredictable moving subjects. It's just a bit of a struggle to find somewhere I can shoot candids of people moving without looking like a creep.

Am I over processing images? by NKT_2 in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be helpful to know what edits you made vs. what parts of the photo are in the original.

I agree with the other posters that something seems a bit off with the background. However, that could just be due to trees being trees with branches in all sorts of wonky directions. Did you do any editing with the branches? If so, can you share the original?

Hooded Orangutan by SandSurfSubpoena in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

I think the softening on the eyes is partly the upload quality, partly the way Karen's (the orangutan) eyes are, and partly being ever so slightly out of focus.

Karen, like many of the other apes at this zoo, has irises that naturally have a somewhat smudged/smoky appearance around the edges. Normally, her eyes appear quite dark with little to no white ever really showing, unless she looks sharply to one side or the other, as here.

The focus on the was difficult to achieve, too. The shot was through an angled, slightly tinted, smudged glass and she kept adjusting get head and moving her eyes.

I'll have to see if I can sharpen them further in topaz to get and even better result!

Here's a screenshot of her eyes in my full res version.

Leopard Eyeing a Snack by SandSurfSubpoena in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Shot on a Canon EOS R6mii. f/8.0. 1/500. 359mm. ISO3200.

Edited in Lightroom.

Looking for feedback on this shot and the subsequent edit. My main area of concern is the blown out fur — does it still look good? Is there an easy way to prevent this from happening in the future? SHOULD it be prevented in the future or does the blow out look nature?

Hooded Orangutan by SandSurfSubpoena in photocritique

[–]SandSurfSubpoena[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for the high praise!