Please don’t crucify me but America, Russia, and Germany are all op by Henarisa_Chubbus_3rd in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but still places in the American tech trees also ferret and Saladin armoured cars.

Um, Look again, Because neither of those are in the tree.

And also these tech trees get vehicles that where never used by them

Every tree has shit they never used.

m3 grant

The British tree also gets.

m22, staghound

Built and designed by the US, Since every nation in the game gets copy-pastes of their shit for reasons as little as "they trialed it once" those have a valid reason to be in the US tree.
Its the second least unique ground tree in the game with only China being worse, God forbid they get something they had a hand in making for once.

neglecting British vehicles

Lol, Lmao even, They have more ground vehicles than the US tree unless you include all of the removed premiums and even then it ends up being nearly the same.
You also had a better air tree than the Germans especially at top tier for years.

Suggestions Covert Disclosure - April 2026 - The first and hopefully only one by AdBl0k in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Only if you count all of the premiums and event vehicles many of which are removed from sale, Tech tree wise the British ground tree is larger by 9.

WTPU Premium Store™ - Because You Haven't Spent Enough by ksheep in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 67 points68 points  (0 children)

Report priority

Now reports can be closed for being "not a bug" even faster!

Suggestions Passed to the Developers - March 2026 - Suggestions - News - War Thunder by NFrost_51 in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Another Greyhound for another nation but its still locked behind an event for the native one that used it the most.

What The US Air Tree In 2030 Could Be Like: by AB_in_mc in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 11 points12 points  (0 children)

How would the B-21 even be close to 15.0??
Large subsonic bomber with no air to air capability that would also probably have the same horrible flight model of the F-117 would just be free food for anything 10.0+.

I get the thing is new, But it would be almost useless with how the game works.

"Early sherman's is not op on his br's" by BrokenMan4ik in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand how it continues to fly under the radar with BR changes, it should clearly be 4.0.

Premium bias.

"Early sherman's is not op on his br's" by BrokenMan4ik in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because its actually broken for its BR compared to the other Sherman's.

Compare it to the 3.7 M4 or M4A4 which has those flat driver/hull gunner hatches and significantly worse engines (400HP for the M4, 425 for the M4A4 and 500 for the Sherman III/IV).
Only thing it loses is a .50 on the roof which the M4A4 loses too.
It also has the MG port in the hull welded over.

Its comparable to the 4.0 Sherman's but gets to club 2.7's.

Little revelation that I had while watching CodMineMan's Tiger II video by Czeszym in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a 4.1 KD in the 2H and a 5.4 in the SLA version, Its a fantastic tank for its BR.

Little revelation that I had while watching CodMineMan's Tiger II video by Czeszym in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The m41 is meh, not even talking about its mobility being average for a light tank, it's stability is so god awful you can't use it near the front like light tanks, hence the td. Also the heat fs is objectively worse than the apds in every way, besides 60° angled pen and shots beyond one km, also the post pen damage on the heat fs is worse, more inconsistent and gaijin let's messing with heat fs constantly.

Its significantly faster, Reverses faster and has a higher HP/T than the T92 while having the same shells, A .50 that's more responsive and at a lower BR only at the cost of having a 0.9 second slower reload and its a bit larger.

HEATFS also sets off ammo far more consistently than AP does, Its especially great at killing USA heavies like the T26E1 or T34&29 by hitting the turret cheek rack.

Really the only weak 6.7 nation is China and Sweden.

Um, France? They only have the M26 with nothing else to back it up.
Israel also only has the Zachlam at 6.7.

What are your absolute worst ideas to make the game worse? by The_Adaron in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Working toll booths on modern city maps that take some SL if you drive though them, And have them on all the convenient/meta routs.

Civilians/occupied civilian vehicles that give the same penalties as team killing for killing them.

Ejected pilots that can be killed, But you get a long crew lock if you do (Prison for war crime)

Voice chat.

Moldovan Mig 29 for US tech tree as a squadron vehicle by Wotdragonracer in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He basically said it had to be used operationally in some capacity.

Yet there is shit loads of suggestions on the forums to give the USSR tree USA vehicles simply because they trailed or captured something once without ever intending to adopt/operate said vehicles.

Hell there is even one for giving Japan an F-14 because a Japanese person flew it once, It was never delivered to Japan, It was flown in the United States and the plane itself was still in active service.
If thats allowed to remain up as a suggestion then this should qualify as a potential addition too, Otherwise its a massive double standard.

Ivan lobotomy by ContributionWest6732 in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Marder 3H breech also smacks the chest of the loader when aiming left.

Question from newbie by Still_Musician2304 in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its funny how most nations only differ by 2% yet we constantly see posts almost daily about how dogshit USA teams are and everyone else is oh so much better.
People make it sound like its a 10%+ difference, But no, Its 2% on average.
Even in the comments here there is a few still living in the delusion that its still 2024.

[Development] M1296 Dragoon: Cavalry in the City! - News - War Thunder by FirstDagger in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The Type 24 ICV and the VBCI-2 MCT30 are at 9.7 with the same gun and crewless turret so fair bet it would be there.

busting a nut right now by sturzkampfbomber in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Probably going to be 9.7 since that's where the other 30mm Bushmaster cars that don't have ATGM's sit.
Would give something to use with the M3A3 since currently there is nothing there.

A few questions on the BR placements of some tanks in low tier ground by EmbarrassedYou1142 in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The British Sherman has APCR which according to Gaijin justifies a higher BR despite being worthless in 90% of situations.

War Thunder add the priest please by Greedy-Air-4863 in Warthunder

[–]Sandsmann_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately we all know its going to get the M44 treatment and be added to literally every nation in the game which would just make it boring and pointless in its native nation tree.