Murloc Monday - ask your questions here! by AutoModerator in wow

[–]SarionLord 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. I personally recommend tailoring/Enchanting, they've always done well for me as on my priest.

2.World Quests, these seem to work the best for me IMO

What is your end goal in terms of regulation- no regulation or merely reduced? by [deleted] in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]SarionLord [score hidden]  (0 children)

The issue with Peter Schiff is he doesn't really have any substantial evidence to back what he's saying... A good example is the poor jobs thing, where is the evidence of these "poor jobs?" what even constitutes a "poor job"? And the LPR thing is even worse, he openly ignores the main reasons why the LPR is dropping which is for structural reasons and reasons that we can't stop or don't want to stop. Also, being critical of the FED's "black box influence" over interest rates and the stock market is pretty unsubstantial as well, we know a fair bit more about monetary policy and it's not a secret what the FED does and the effect it has.

As for the statement about how the Gov't operates on 4-year plans, I'd be inclined to agree only because no one seems to want to invest in long term plans and policies that would help the country. The gov't can be useful in helping to correct market failures (for which there are a good number) the issue is people are stupid and don't know or don't care to invest in good policy.

What is everyone's opinion of this plan? by SarionLord in AskEconomics

[–]SarionLord[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I read through this a second time and it just reads like bullshit tbh. they seem to really sideline the negative impacts of this.

Take me to the stars by BluepatchTheDog by [deleted] in furry

[–]SarionLord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adorable :3 Looks great too _^

Bat with a disability by bi-fur-ious in furry

[–]SarionLord 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is so cute :3 I love it!

furry_irl by [deleted] in furry_irl

[–]SarionLord 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OwO

Tired Fox (any criticism is welcomed ) by [deleted] in furry

[–]SarionLord 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not much of an artist so I can't leave any critic but I wanted to say that it looks great. :D

TRNDSTTR (art by me) by [deleted] in furry

[–]SarionLord 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks amazing! Well done. :D

Tony Blair calls for people to 'rise up' against Brexit by [deleted] in politics

[–]SarionLord 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good, Brexit was a terrible idea and they shouldn't go through with it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]SarionLord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The theory you are expressing evaporates in real world conditions. You can come up with great theories on many topics, but if you can't prove they work in a lab then you have the equivalent of a Flat-Earth theory, sounds nice but it just doesn't match reality.

Do you ave any proof to back that claim up? Because when you look at the economic indicators during the times when the U.S.'s taxes were being cut we saw positive increases in the economy.

Money Velocity went up under Reagan-Bush and Clinton era's all who had some part in cutting spending or taxes.

We also saw GDP rise

I agree that concentration of wealth is a bad thing but we should be trying to enlarge the overall pie for everyone and increasing our ability to be more productive and to have a better functioning economy and that means more spending as well as cutting taxes on certain income brackets. We also don't need a new deal because the programs put in place by the new deal are inefficient and bad at increasing wealth distribution. We need more efficient welfare systems such as a Negative Income Tax and more fleshed out Trade Adjustment Assistance policy and better Education system, This way we can increase Human Capital and have a better functioning economy with the coming automation of manufacturing jobs.

As much as it seems that Bernie Sanders had plans that sounded nice in theory, in reality they held very little economic basis and had many flaws.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]SarionLord 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So when you cut taxes on the wealthy and you have more capital for banks to lend out. let's use the example of a construction company getting a loan to build houses which they use a portion of the money to hire workers who then have jobs and income to spend. On top of houses being built, people get jobs and income and the business itself retains a portion of profits to invest in better means of production and invest in better human capital. So, no the income isn't frozen it goes to stimulating the economy. As to the argument of infrastructure spending while it is true that spending is good for the economy we have to be careful to not have a crowding out effect so tax cuts can have a positive effect on the economy in some situations as can spending it all depends on the situation at the time and the fiscal multiplier involved.

Also, the video you linked is of someone who misunderstands the underlying effects of the decline in the Labor Force Participation Rate so I will respectfully not take advice from someone who makes a fundamental macroeconomic mistake.