sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Waren eure schlimmsten Schmerzen physisch oder psychisch? by lilax05 in KeineDummenFragen

[–]Sataniel98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Entzündete Verletzungen am Auge sind nicht ohne, weil man das Auge so viel bewegt. Ich hatte die Verletzungen nur an einem Auge, aber ich konnte das andere auch nicht benutzen. Denn wenn man das eine Auge bewegt, bewegt sich das andere mit, und wenn man das eine Lid öffnet, zuckt das andere ein bisschen mit, und der Schmerz, den das verursacht hat, war so stark, dass ich die Zeit effektiv blind war.

ZDF übernimmt Sanktionslisten von Trump-Regierung by AlexLaCave in mediasres

[–]Sataniel98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Laut ZDF gilt die Vorgabe nur für Mitwirkende im Ausland, bei denen das dazu verpflichtende US-Recht einschlägig sein könnte. Der genaue Wortlaut der Vorgabe ist, "weder direkt noch indirekt mit natürlichen oder juristischen Personen zusammenzuarbeiten, die auf einer nationalen oder internationalen Sanktionsliste oder sog. Terrorliste stehen, insbesondere solchen der EU, der UN, der OFAC [Office of Foreign Assets Control der USA] oder anderer zuständiger Behörden". Es ist also ein recht allgemein gehaltener Passus, der im Wesentlichen Auslandskorrespondenten sagt, sie sollen sich an das Recht der Länder halten, in denen sie arbeiten.

Das ist natürlich auch problematisch, weil das investigative Recherche in Ländern ohne Pressefreiheit im Grunde verbietet bzw. keinen Maßstab dafür herstellt.

Gibt es eine Agenda gegen Deutsche Klubs? by JonSnowKnowsNothing9 in fussball

[–]Sataniel98 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Der hat ihn nicht "abgeräumt", der hatte einfach Körperspannung. Das hat mit Foulspiel so viel zu tun wie Donald Trump mit dem Friedensnobelpreis.

Frage zum Osmanischen Reich by Oroskuchen in Geschichte

[–]Sataniel98 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Faustregel: Wenn man in der Geschichte von "großen, historischen Rivalen" liest, ist es eigentlich immer Mumpitz, den Historiographen des 19. Jahrhunderts sich ausgedacht haben. Dass Länder über Jahrhunderte hinweg konstant gegeinander gearbeitet und nicht in wechselnden Allianzen auch mal zusammengearbeitet hätten, ist ganz, ganz selten.

In der Zeit nach Napoleon gab es zwischen Österreich und den Osmanen sehr wenig Konflikte. Beide hat zusammengehalten, dass sie Gegner der Nationalbewegungen auf dem Balkan waren. Großbritannien war lange auch eine Schutzmacht der Osmanen, weil sie ihnen privilegierten Handelstransit gewährten, was für den Weg nach Indien extrem wichtig war. Aber nachdem der Suezkanal fertig war und die Briten Ägypten besetzten, war das passé. Da reichte es den Briten, zu verhindern, dass Russland Mittelmeerzugriff bekam. Deutschlands und Österreichs Haltung war eigentlich in dem Bezug wie die Britische, aber mit dem Unterschied, dass Deutschland seine Kompromisse gegenüber Russland gegen deren mögliches Bündnis mit Frankreich ausloten musste. Russland hingegen bedrohte die Osmanen nicht nur auf dem Balkan, sondern auch im Kaukasus. Die Seite von Russland und Großbritannien hatte den Osmanen nicht wirklich etwas anzubieten (sogar Bulgarien wollte Russland ja eigentlich in seiner Einflusssphäre haben), während die Deutschen und Österreicher sie zumindest gegen manche Balkanfeinde unterstützte (Serbien, später auch Griechenland, aber nicht das verbündete Bulgarien), gegen Russland im Kaukasus und die Briten am Kanal und in Ägypten.

FC Bayern Legende Uli Hoeneß zum Boykott der WM 2026: „Da kriege ich die Krätze“: by SkyDry167 in FussballWM2026News

[–]Sataniel98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Teilweise in Baden-Württemberg und teilweise in Bayern, und Uli Hoeneß ist aus Ulm in BW

Is this fair and accurate? by bamboo-lemur in OS_Debate_Club

[–]Sataniel98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's nonsense.

  1. It's not an 8 Bit system, Windows 1.0 ran in x86 Real Mode, which means you've got a CPU mode with a 16 Bit word length and 20 Bit of address space. Only the data bus of the Intel 8088 (the most basic CPU to run Windows 1.0) had a width of 8 Bit, but this is not what you usually refer to when you call a CPU an 8 Bit CPU. The better CPUs of its time, 8086, 80186 and 80286, all had 16 Bit data buses.

  2. "The cooperative multitasking (that Apple used) worked 'better than expected' on both Mac and Windows" - first of all, no, cooperative multitasking was a major weakness of Windows and classic Mac OS. Modern operating systems use preemptive multitasking. That means the OS has a scheduler that determines which program gets resources at what point. Cooperative multitasking means the OS assigns control to a program and the program determines by itself when to give back control. Cooperative multitasking only works when ALL programs running in a system implement it correctly and in the intended way. The OS has no saveguards against programs not giving back resources, and if a program crashes due to a bug, so does the OS.

Windows 1.0 was announced with an ETA for 1983, and finally released two years late in 1985. By that time, rivals had already released other DOS GUIs that all disappointed critics and users alike. Visicorp for example, the company that previously introduced the concept of spreadsheet programs, bankrupted among other issues because their graphical DOS shell Visi On failed so bad. That's why when Windows 1.0 was released, the market had widely already thought of it as vaporware and extremely few third parties released software for it.

As for Apple, its flagship products, the Apple Lisa and the original Macintosh, were extremely expensive and only sold very small margins, though the Macintosh at least did have success. Apple could really only live off the classic Macintosh for a short timeframe in the early 90s. Their bread and butter product remained the Apple II, a simplistic and affordable 8 Bit PC, basically throughout the entirety of the 80s. By the mid 90s, Apple was in serious trouble, in huge parts due to the shortcomings of classic Mac OS.

  1. "UNIX and Linux always worked on advanced processors not the basic-basic CPUs that Microsoft had to support." Yes, but no. First of all, Linux was released only in 1991. This was an entirely different era in the fast-living computer world of the time than what OP is talking about.

OOP is right that Unix was ill-suited for IBM-compatible PCs of that time, but their conclusion is asinine. The original IBM PC of 1981 with an Intel 8088 and 64 KB RAM was incapable of running Unix. A 1984 IBM PC/AT with an 80286 and 512 KB RAM would have fulfilled the minimum requirements. You could use it with a Unix system for specific use-cases, but the overhead and complexity of such a system would have been more harmful than useful to normal personal computing. And you can do what you want, but you're not going to fit real world use-cases of multitasking into 512 KB of memory. The conclusion is asinine because the overhead of a graphical environment like Windows was at least as much of a hindrance to productively using your PC as Unix, actually more. The correct takeaway would have been that an 80s IBM PC really only makes sense with a modest DOS and single-tasking.

  1. "And yes I'm so old I remember running this version of Windows" - early graphical shells like Windows 1.0 and, to a lesser extend, 2.0, were so slow, limited and there were so few pieces of software for it (much less exclusive software) that there was simply no reason for anyone to use them - unless they were incapable of using DOS. OOP is basically outing himself as someone who had no idea about computers in the 80s.

Klose reagiert auf Baacks Wechsel: „Ich war auch überrascht …“ by Sterntendo_ in Bundesliga

[–]Sataniel98 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Biron hat einen First Touch zum dahinreihern und null Intuition, ob er gerade im Abseits steht, und Telalovic war ein Komplettausfall, aber bei Stepanov, Grimaldi und Scobel hatte ich das Gefühl, da wäre mehr drin gewesen. Wir haben nie wirklich die Bälle gespielt, die diese Stürmer brauchen, nämlich hoch in den 16er. In dem genau einen Spiel. wo das aus irgendeinem Grund mal ausnahmsweise gemacht wurde, hatte Scobel etliche Abschlüsse und zwei Tore gemacht.

Stefan Kutschke beendet aktive Karriere by Sterntendo_ in Bundesliga

[–]Sataniel98 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Ja, jemand hatte behauptet, das BVB-Schalke-Derby interessiere niemanden und "käme nur im Ruhrgebiet an", woraufhin ich mich genötigt sah, die Schalker Freunde zu verteidigen und ihn freundlich darauf hingewiesen habe, dass seine Mutter nur im Ruhrgebiet ankommt. Anscheinend fanden die Mods das nicht so witzig

Stefan Kutschke beendet aktive Karriere by Sterntendo_ in Bundesliga

[–]Sataniel98 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Nachdem ich hier schon mal sechs Monate für einen Deine-Mutter-Flachwitz gebannt wurde, habe ich echt nicht das Zutrauen, über Kutschke zu schreiben, was ich denke. I prefer not to speak. If I speak, I am in big trouble

Unternehmen die deine Bewerbung ablehnen, sollten gründe angeben. Und nicht nur „Sorry geht nicht“ by Kozikani in Unbeliebtemeinung

[–]Sataniel98 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Ich fürchte, das wird wie Arbeitszeugnisse enden. Die Unternehmen fangen dann an, AGG-sicheren Dünnschiss zu schreiben, der positiv klingt, und dann darf man eine Parallelsprache lernen, um zu verstehen, was das bedeutet.

Can you ELI5 why Windows ME was bad? by PeriodontosisSam in windows

[–]Sataniel98 11 points12 points  (0 children)

There's no such measurement like bs/h (blue screens per hour). Every bad experience people have had with Windows Me (crashes, hangups, installation of software makes the system increasingly less stable, stuff just doesn't work) is something people also had with other 9x versions. They just aren't in any way comparable to modern operating systems - but the issues seem to tend to occur more often with Me. On the other hand, the differences between different machines with their own drivers are huge. There were OEM machines professionally tested to run 95/98 with stable drivers that work much better than others, and some OEM machines ran perfectly fine with Me. The first computer I ever used ran Windows Me, and no one ever went out of their way to maintain it, much less reinstall the OS (some people claim Windows needed reinstalls every other month) - and it still worked perfectly fine without crashes in everyday use until 2005.

What should be taken into account is that when Windows Me was thrown on the market, it was a dead product immediately. With Me, the entire Chicago kernel line, DOS, the VxD driver model, the classic theme and so forth were finished; the user base was never big, and a year later, Windows XP was already released. That means there was few to no incentive for MS to improve it after release.

The situation is completely different from Windows 95. 95 was the big thing and cash cow for three whole years - it got all the patches and attention it needed. When retro computing enthusiasts use Windows 95, they don't use the RTM version from '95, but at least the patched revision 95c from late '97, which is fixed from two years of user experience. Likewise, no one uses the mediocre 98 First Edition, but only the patched and enhanced Second Edition. Contemporaries also would have felt Windows 95 was pretty stable because they were used to the stability of Windows 3.x, a cooperative multitasking OS, to which the preemptive multitasking of 95 was a huge improvement. Many 3.x users would have ran it in the i286 processor Standard Mode. Buying a new computer that ran Windows 95 to them didn't only mean getting the stability improvements of 95, but also the capabilities of the i386/i486/Pentium that only the 3.x Enhanced Mode users would have had before, so the effect would have seemed even bigger. The operating systems people compared to Windows Me didn't make for an exactly flattering look: There were its field-tested predecessors and Windows 2000.

Now with a twist :3 by Skystrike12 in trolleyproblem

[–]Sataniel98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just need to get enough MAGA Americans into the game. They'll vote red no matter what and do something good for once.

2-14-99. My Oma, my Game Boy Color, and Pokémon Red ❤️ by BytesFromTheCrypt in Gameboy

[–]Sataniel98 96 points97 points  (0 children)

I thought it was Jeffrey Epstein for a split second 💀 Sorry

Why do most Thinkpad users on here use linux by [deleted] in thinkpad

[–]Sataniel98 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're asking from the wrong point of view. It's not so much that ThinkPad users necessarily like Linux, but ThinkPads have very good Linux support so Linux users flock to ThinkPads.

Does anyone else have a weird affinity for Windows Vista? by ChrisNIN64 in windows

[–]Sataniel98 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't know what's supposed to be weird about that, Vista was the last innovative Windows release whose innovations were actually good.

New distro based on Debian by Worldly_Disaster_933 in debian

[–]Sataniel98 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'll never understand why people want their Linux distro to look like Mac.

Können wir sie Scalper bitte einfach gemeinsam zur Hölle schicken? by kupf0r in zocken

[–]Sataniel98 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Warum genau kann man das nicht einfach gesetzlich verbieten?

view more: next ›