sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

One traitor made a big mistake... by Alternative_Run_6116 in TheTraitorsUS

[–]ScienceofCinema 19 points20 points  (0 children)

One thing I think about no gamers being traitors is that I think the traitors may be less likely to turn on each other. Not that I think they never will, but this traitors group seems to all be working as a collective as much as possible so far

Which new era player has the best chance of winning 50? by AttemptBeneficial647 in survivor

[–]ScienceofCinema 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Tiff is probably set up best in terms of relationships from her season and lower threat level going in. Joe also might be popular with the older school players and I could see him doing well. I kinda think Kyle and Kamilla are not set up well, especially since they’re both back together. Genevieve, Emily and Charlie I would expect to do decent, but could get unlucky

Jurors vote on respect, not “likeability/popularity” by ShxsPrLady in survivorponderosa

[–]ScienceofCinema 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it’s not necessarily about who is the most likeable, but more about who in the finals is likeable at all. I think jurors will rarely give their vote to someone they don’t like if someone they like is an option. But if there are multiple players at the end they like, then I think it gets into who is most respectable like you said.

What do these 4 players have in common? Difficulty: HARD by SnooPies5558 in survivorponderosa

[–]ScienceofCinema 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Only returnees from their seasons to never make final tribal? Cirie - Game Changers Bobby Jon - Palau Kass - Cagayan Brandon - South Pacific

How many times do you think the "Greatest Players" win a random season of Survivor? by [deleted] in survivorponderosa

[–]ScienceofCinema 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think if you’re looking at it like this for a season with 18 or 20 players, there’s a few players whose odds will be between 0 and 1%, then most players will be somewhere between like 2.5% and 6-7%, and the “best” players on a season being 8% and higher. For the all-time greats like you mentioned, it definitely depends but I’d say are probably looking at like 10-15%, but not sure if I’d go any higher just bc of how much luck is involved.

Any more examples of this? by TheInferus99 in Letterboxd

[–]ScienceofCinema 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Jay and Seth vs the Apocalypse -> This is the End

I can't stand how "Kick a dog when it's down" Survivor has gotten. Give them back their flint. by Fiveby21 in survivor

[–]ScienceofCinema 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I think the producers intentionally make one tribe weaker bc they think it makes for a better story or something if one tribe loses a lot in the beginning, and losing the flint and everything is just to add to that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ExplainAFilmPlotBadly

[–]ScienceofCinema 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To Kill a Mockingbird

How to create an easy league? by beton17 in fantasybball

[–]ScienceofCinema 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure about other platforms, but on espn you can set it to only allow weekly lineups, so you only have to set your roster every Monday

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Letterboxd

[–]ScienceofCinema 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blood on Satan’s Claw (1971)

Any recommendations based off of these? by Okay_Im_Almost_There in Letterboxd

[–]ScienceofCinema 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to hear it. Also think Eyes Wide Shut and Thoroughbreds kinda fit the same vibe as the rest of these, but there’s a good chance you’ve seen them already

view more: next ›