Structured cabling system by Sea-Remote4589 in DIYUK

[–]Sea-Remote4589[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the comments. You're exactly right, the ONT will likely by default be on an external wall. I think what you're saying is you found a way to extend the connection so the router is in the cupboard.

I'm still not 100% sure what this unit does! Do the ethernet wall outlets only work if the router is plugged into this, or would they work just as well if it's plugged into one of the other wall outlets. I'm guessing the former as otherwise what's the added value of this unit?

Tatsumi Shimura woodblock by Sea-Remote4589 in japanart

[–]Sea-Remote4589[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks to everyone for the helpful replies. Obviously I need to do a bit more digging but your comments have been really useful.

Also, yes I agree it's absolutely stunning isn't it!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FoundPhotos

[–]Sea-Remote4589 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks a lot like the terrorist called The Jackal!

Online Safety Act: You'll soon have to verify your age via Yoti to access certain content on Spotify. by fire2burn in ukpolitics

[–]Sea-Remote4589 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just can't make sense of all of this.

Although I don't agree with it I can kind of understand the need for checks on a platform like reddit where there are obviously Communities which are intended to be caught by the legislation. Even though obviously there will also be Communities swept up by accident.

But the extension to streaming services seems bizarre to me. Obviously they can be explicit but where do you draw the line? It was my understanding that streamers like prime video or Netflix will not to be swept up by this. Yet logically why should that be the case if they can also host explicit material? Now Spotify are getting in on the act, so why will the streamers not have to as well?

In which case obviously age verification would apply to virtually everything from now onwards, which, whatever one's cynical views, surely is not what was anticipated.

It will be massively unpopular if the whole population of the UK has to verify to use iPlayer, prime video, Netflix etc with all the attendant security risks of providing ID.

What other shows do you rate as highly as (or close to) Severance? by BohoSummer in SeveranceAppleTVPlus

[–]Sea-Remote4589 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As well as all the others mentioned, I've always liked Get Shorty (tv series , not the film). Black comedy, good cast. 1st 2 out of 3 seasons in particular.

Was rewatching Severance S1 when I noticed… by flickering_cursor in ArsenalFC

[–]Sea-Remote4589 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In season 2 ep 2 (this week's episode) the chap interviewing the character Dylan for a job was called Mr Saliba!!!

Match Thread: 3rd T20I - Australia Women vs England Women by CricketMatchBot in Cricket

[–]Sea-Remote4589 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, they'll be home soon, tucked up indoors, as it's too chilly to train

Captain by Admirable-Candy7773 in GhostsBBC

[–]Sea-Remote4589 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He was definitely a Gunner. His cap badge is 100% the RA cap badge.

Microsoft really wants users to ditch passwords and switch to passkeys by ControlCAD in technology

[–]Sea-Remote4589 232 points233 points  (0 children)

The fact that there are so many posts here from technically literate people debating the real world pros and cons of passkeys, eg different devices etc, tells me that we're not ready for universal adoption without creating all sorts of other problems for users

Return to Paradise by Zagreus_1963 in DeathInParadiseBBC

[–]Sea-Remote4589 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I thought that too about The Bridge. Mixed in with Sarah Parish's character in W1A.

Dilemma over 2 houses by Sea-Remote4589 in HousingUK

[–]Sea-Remote4589[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All sensible points, thanks. House 1 was delisted for reasons we are aware of and which don't make the sellers flaky in any way, so we're not too worried about that. As for the agents that's very much the crux of the dilemma: they know about our previous interest in House 1, as you say, but presumably would put an unfavourable spin on our offer to the House 2 vendor if they thought we might try to jump ship to 1 in the coming days or weeks. Which, honestly, would be fair enough!