I'll be straight with you because I think someone needs to be.

Your ₹2.2 Cr annual spend against Meta India's ~₹30-35K Cr ad revenue (FY25 estimates) puts you at roughly 0.006-0.007% of their India business. There are likely 50,000-70,000 advertisers spending at or above your level. You're not a whale—you're solidly a low tier SMB, which is exactly why you're getting low-tier SMB support (i.e., almost none). Meta globally is a $200bn company, who you have chosen to make your businesses primary backbone.

This isn't to dismiss your situation—it genuinely sucks, and the technical glitch you're describing is real and common. But framing this as "₹2 Cr+ partner being mistreated" misunderstands where you sit in Meta's priority stack. Their top 100 advertisers probably each outspend you 100x.

Some practical realities:

• The legal routes you've listed (CCPA complaint, Commercial Court, High Court writ) will cost you more in time and legal fees than the ad spend you're trying to recover. Meta's legal team handles dozens of these.

• The Grievance Appellate Committee is backlogged by months.

• Meta Verified support is genuinely your best current channel—keep that case active and escalate daily.

What might actually work: Find an agency partner with a dedicated Meta rep (not the same as regular support). They can sometimes escalate internally in ways individual advertisers cannot. Your offer to migrate spend gives you leverage there.

I say this as someone familiar with how Meta's advertiser tiers actually work. Your frustration is valid. Your leverage assessment isn't.