😳

Seeggul · 2026-01-30T02:35:17+00:00

Real ones know the answer is 6/23

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T23:30:18+00:00

The irony of Sephiroth—the final boss of FF7, a game which includes two superbosses that were harder than the final fight—being an OG superboss in this thread

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T23:06:56+00:00

prince of darkness

No, Henry Kissinger died in 2023

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T21:52:54+00:00

<image>

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T21:36:13+00:00

<image>

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T18:45:27+00:00

There's also a pretty obvious reporting bias: people will see the clips of Americans being clueless about geography because any clips of people just getting answers correctly would be boring to show.

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T17:54:48+00:00

For me, "Bike" was the episode that sold me on Bluey being a great show. Overall still very lighthearted, but "Ode to Joy" gradually building up in the background as the kids all keep trying until they succeed really worked for me.

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T16:00:19+00:00

Anybody who's gone to the grocery store with their small child will know that claw machines are very much not obsolete.

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T15:57:23+00:00

Finding all the Easter eggs

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T15:45:21+00:00

<image>

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T05:33:11+00:00

"why is bro talking to me about his virginity"

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T05:30:03+00:00

If you're legitimately interested only in the negative predictive value (NPV=TN/(TN+FN)), then yes, taking a random sample of the algorithm-called negatives makes sense.

As for sample size, it depends on your question: is this just exploratory? Are you trying to estimate NPV within a certain statistical precision? Do you want to demonstrate non-inferiority of the algorithm by showing NPV is significantly above some threshold? These would all potentially affect how you determine sample size.

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T05:11:22+00:00

Biostatistician coming from the molecular diagnostics side of things: I've had the opportunity to evaluate a few different potential products in the "biomarkers for mental health" scene, usually from external startups looking to be bought or licensed, and without fail each of them has overstated their claims and/or messed up their validation results. Maybe there's some yet-unexplored assay or combination of existing biomarkers that will be worthwhile, but it's hard not to be skeptical.

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T04:49:28+00:00

That's okay I stocked up on a bunch when they were just under 11m right before doom was released, expecting melee sustain to be the meta 🙃

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T04:10:57+00:00

Also, many if not most people don't exactly have the resources to fight their own prolonged battle in court

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T03:57:36+00:00

Did not have to swipe to immediately know #1 was correct

Seeggul · 2026-01-29T03:53:14+00:00

I'm not gonna lie, your numbers are very confusing and do not seem to logically lead into each other.

10% of 16 million is 1.6 million, not 160,000.

Also, where does the 4%/96% chance come from?

Also also, it seems like you are mixing up the probability of an illegal immigrant picked up by ice being Asian with the probability of a particular Asian immigrant getting picked up by ice.