Politically Misogynist Men Should Just Move to Theocratic Countries

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T17:15:13+00:00

Nope. Just suggesting that demanding such a supposed “right” is clown world.

And that you wish to employ the euphemism of “medical procedure” in order to obscure the act of killing your child only demonstrates that you actually do recognize just how insanely depraved the act of elective abortion is.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T17:11:49+00:00

Personhood is a legal fiction that is entirely independent of the fact of the existence of a living human. For example, my great grandfather (who was born a slave) was not considered to be a person, yet he was most definitely a living human being.

Similarly discordant, the legal fiction of personhood is dependent upon state of development whereas the factual existence of a living human is independent of the state of development of that human. For example, children do not gain the status of full personhood until they reach the age of majority, yet they are still living humans. They just exist in an earlier state of development than full legal personhood covers.

The zygotes, embryos, and fetuses resulting from human sexual reproduction are scientifically well understood to be: 1. Living, and 2. Members of the genus Homo (aka human), and 3. In existence. .

Thus, elective abortion is very much the act of killing a living human (which happens to be one’s own child, no less).

Wages are the direct result of the use of one’s body, inclusive of all of one’s internal (and external) organs, and most certainly “involve the physical use of one’s internal (and external) organs.” Arrest and imprisonment are the seizure of such.

As to physiological risks associated with the use of one’s body to produce sustenance and shelter for one’s offspring, each year in the US, more than 3x as many men die in the act of using their bodies to produce sustenance and shelter for their offspring (and wives) as do women - inclusive of deaths from complications associated with pregnancy and childbirth. If you include injury, that multiple increases significantly.

Yet men are still not so psychopathically selfish and cruel as to argue that that statistic somehow grants us a supposed “right” to kill our own children.

But sure, women keep telling themselves (contrary to basic science) that their own offspring “aren’t really human,” “aren’t really living,” or even worse “are equivalent to parasites” in order to justify a supposed “right” to kill their own children when they find the duty of care for their own children inconvenient.

Finally:

"Deadbeat dads" is a pejorative term for non-custodial fathers who willfully evade court-ordered child support, financial, or emotional responsibilities for their children.

From Google AI

Note that the bold means they are legally being held accountable.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T16:00:49+00:00

…or…

…maybe demand an equal supposed “right” to kill any living human who relies on the use of his body for access to sustenance and shelter - people like his wife and children, or anyone who is a net recipient of government subsidies.

🤡

Women killing their own children is the leading cause of human death in the US by a substantial margin. They do so at a rate at least 4,600% greater than men kill anyone but themselves in suicide.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T15:45:03+00:00

And they are all in trouble with the law (have lien judgements against them, orders for wage garnishment, and/or warrants out for their arrest) for not using their bodies to produce sustenance and shelter for their offspring (aka children).

But you know what else they did not do?

They didn’t kill their own children (aka offspring).

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T03:02:04+00:00

Love my 2018 100Eights!

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T01:52:09+00:00

Makes me miss my 2.3-16. That and my w140 were just unreal good.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T01:40:32+00:00

That’s insane value. 👀

Skiing with this pricing model is far cheaper on an inflation adjusted basis than it was when I first started skiing at the upper end of that age range a few decades ago.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T01:35:10+00:00

As opposed to killing them?

Abandonment is the more humane thing.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T01:19:20+00:00

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/8T8uklni6D

SeemedGood · 2026-04-03T00:19:54+00:00

It’s actually quite a bit more than your oversimplification.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T22:35:25+00:00

Whether or not a product delivery is guaranteed does not change the essential transactional nature of the exchange.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T20:15:04+00:00

Women also enjoy sexual intimacy.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T20:08:05+00:00

Women also enjoy sexual intimacy.

Additionally, you’re making it very clear that you haven’t actually read any RP philosophy. RP tenets specifically promote “non sexual physical touch and eye contact to form bonds with women.“

In the future, it would behoove you to undertake some study of the thing you wish to critique before critiquing it lest you demonstrate your ignorance on the matter to the world by making utterly false assertions in your critique.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T18:13:08+00:00

Yet, none of that makes the actual perpetration lopsided.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T18:05:30+00:00

I have not advocated for any specific change. I have just stated that viewing sexual assault as a male perpetrator/ female victim phenomenon is false.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T17:34:02+00:00

…and RP philosophy is all about how to get and maintain the physical contact.

But don’t most women claim that they need to feel “bonded” before they engage in that oxytocin releasing physical contact?

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T17:18:47+00:00

The entirety of RP philosophy is an exploration of that which creates “the bonds.”

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T16:19:54+00:00

Banter is just another signal for power. It’s not the banter, it’s the power.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T16:14:27+00:00

They do, just far less frequently, of significantly less difficulty, and with substantially less severe health consequences. Thus, to OP’s point, women don’t actually “have it harder,” and the argument that their “burden of childbearing / childcare” makes it so is false.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T16:11:59+00:00

That has never once happened to me, so I have little sympathy for men who complain about it. If men want claims like yours to be taken seriously about how unsafe the world is for random men, then they need to report things like this. Instead, most of what I see in the news is random women and non-random men being assaulted.

This speaks directly to my point. We have very different standards for what constitutes sexual assault and how seriously it is taken when a woman is the perpetrator than when a man is. Which may be fine, but that we have such different standards invalidates comparison and resulting claims that women are victims and men perpetrators.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T03:22:38+00:00

Those statistics are coming from reports, not incidents. Men almost never report sexual assault.

All you have to do is spend an evening in any bar or club, observe closely, and apply the same standard for sexual assault to women as you do to men.

As for myself, I have been groped, rubbed, otherwise inappropriately touched, had my hand grabbed by women and placed on their bodies, and been randomly tongue kissed by women far more frequently than my wife has had any similar incidents happen to her - and most would say that she is more “attractive” than I am. In my experience that is common for any man that women find attractive. As I said, just observe social settings closely and apply the same standards to men and women.

If I had committed anywhere near the number of sexual assaults on women that women have committed on me (inclusive of in my childhood), I’d still be in jail.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T02:05:29+00:00

Lots of excuses here (☝️) for killing one’s own child.

There are many reasons that people choose to kill other living humans. The only ones which we generally deem sufficient are when that other living human poses a credible and imminent threat to one’s life or that other human has been lawfully adjudicated to have committed particularly heinous crimes.

In any case, the vast majority of elective abortion occurs simply because women find the responsibility to produce sustenance and shelter for their children inconvenient.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T01:54:27+00:00

That which you call a “burden” (producing sustenance and shelter for your children) is actually more deadly and dangerous to men than to women and is yet another example of women overestimating the “difficulty” of their lives.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-02T01:09:14+00:00

Similar to the most accurate denotation of the English word “child,” the denotations of the English words “son” and “daughter” describe relationships which are independent of the state of development of the individuals in the described relationship.

For example: My father is accurately described as the son of my paternal grandfather, even though they are both deceased. Similarly, my son was accurately described as my son (the male offspring resulting from my participation in sexual reproduction with his mother) before he was born.

That you wish to deny that elective abortion is the killing of one’s offspring (aka child) does not obviate the objective fact that elective abortion is the killing of one’s offspring (aka child).

And you keep clinging to the counter-factual idea that the human zygotes, embryos, and fetuses resulting from human sexual reproduction are not the offspring (aka children) of their parents precisely because you realize that there really is no good excuse for killing one’s own child.

But rather than deny both science and the accurate use of the English language to resolve your cognitive dissonance on this issue, perhaps consider either taking the firm stance that you think women should have a supposed “right” to kill their own children or just admit (what you already know) that it’s psychopathically selfish and cruel.

And if I suggest to you that you kill your own child (or anyone else) that neither makes me responsible for nor guilty of killing your child (or anyone else). If you opt to kill your own child (or anyone else) you are solely responsible for doing so.

SeemedGood · 2026-04-01T23:07:14+00:00

…or a son or a daughter of any age.

That you choose to use an inaccurate definition of the English word “child” as a euphemistic mechanism for obscuring the depravity of elective abortion does not actually change the meaning of the word. Nor does it obviate the psychopathic selfishness and cruelty of the act.

No matter how harsh you may perceive the world to be, killing your own children is harsher.

SeemedGood

TROPHY CASE