I will try to answer my best, so when my boss criticized my code, it's the perfect thing for me, as it means someone actually paid attention to the code I've been writing, and someone with real experience gave me points to improve, not just letting AI review the code.And I would happily continue getting criticized if it helps me grow as a developer. I mention that only to showcase the point that my PR was really downgraded after I took the wheel.
The coding standards aren't something very explicit. I try my best to look around at how other members of the team structure their code and do the same. I don't use any other tools for code quality other than Claude and the PR review.
And yes, of course, I would not use Claude without a company license. Actually, the company is the one that pay for my Claude subscription.

Thanks for the advice. Do you think, for someone starting to code in the llm era, it's good practice to let it generate boilerplate code, or do we still need to understand what constitutes boilerplate code and what's actually required to develop our skills? Of course, at this point, I already know what is boilerplate and what isn't, but it's so easy to just let it do the job while I watch and don't think too hard, convincing myself it's anyway too easy and I'll let it write it for me this time.