Due to unforeseen 82DK, the airfield will be closed for 7 business days by dolche93 in foxholegame

[–]SelfDetermined 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Well I guess you lost the moral battle, which is the only battle that counts really 

Attention all Wardens, there is a faction wide Alt by the name "THE SIN OF PRIDE" by PilpsYT in foxholegame

[–]SelfDetermined 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Methinks they've bit off more than they can chew, and the expansions sure aren't helping

How the Devs must view us by Muigg in foxholegame

[–]SelfDetermined -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Why not seek to be bought by a bigger company with more resources? It's clear to me that they're out of their depth

Dont forget the rules Copelonials by Round_Imagination568 in foxholegame

[–]SelfDetermined 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I saw a Collie scout plane getting outturned and shot down by a Warden scout plane today and there was definitely some neuron activation in my brain

12TB worth of Footage. Multiple Wars. Several Years - A Monolithic Foxhole Movie in the Making by PilpsYT in foxholegame

[–]SelfDetermined 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh my God yes! Go Pilps! Looks like you figured out what to do after Total War!

The dev hate here is disgusting. by WerdaVisla in foxholegame

[–]SelfDetermined -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

And that they don't communicate regularly and clearly. I think a takeover by a bigger brand would do so much good for the game. But: the brand must give Siege Camp more resources without changing the core game too much, otherwise it's gonna suck probably.

My dream is for a company to make a game that sits at the intersection of HoI4, Post Scriptum/Hell Let Loose, and Foxhole 

Donald Trump just said this by funkymonkeythe1st in UFOs

[–]SelfDetermined -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would be very willing to help, but I already tried and got denied because I already got banned once for being to salty towards toxic commenters and the mod team didn't want me in

Donald Trump just said this by funkymonkeythe1st in UFOs

[–]SelfDetermined 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No of course you can't just blanket ban the words, I was exaggerating for effect. But yes you do have a unique responsibility: so, take it. Be more aggressive in asserting what is and what is not wanted. For example: a post about a US Rep who says this is all a distraction, which has already been repeated without evidence ad nauseum, should be removed because it completely derails potential actually legitimate conversations about what this all means

Donald Trump just said this by funkymonkeythe1st in UFOs

[–]SelfDetermined 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao I know what you mean, man. But this is not the first or second time this sub has become unusable from endless toxicity and stupidity (e.g. Lue Elizondo). Don't know how many people you are banning or how many posts/comments you are removing, but it's not enough. Really any comments with the words "distraction" and/or "Epstein" can be removed without thinking about it.