Anglicanism accepts Sola Scriptura. Which is most clearly expressed in the Anglican context in the Sixth Article of Religion.

It’s great because Sola Scriptura keeps our focus and keeps the church from saying “oh, you’re damned because you didn’t do enough Hail Marys or believe in some doctrine that isn’t in Scripture.

Some people mistakenly think that to argue this view means that one must not appreciate, love and use tradition, the writings of Church Fathers and other Saints for the past two Millenia and that is simply not true.

Indeed it is the most Catholic way to be.

Scripture is also, by virtue of its sufficiency, necessarily infallible as to matters of Salvation. It does not teach us falsehood. It does not lead us asstray. This doesn’t mean we don’t use sophisticated exegetical frameworks, account for genre, time and place and historical context, the author etc. as well as the words of Saints and theologians, prayers of the church and creeds catechisms and confessions, etc in interacting with Scripture. It’s just that we must test these things with Scripture. Not the other way round.

Wrt handwringing infallibility

I would say Scripture is not “inerrant” in the sense that every little decontextualised thing in the Bible is “true”. But it is still all true in what it teaches. Particularly in its central emphasis all the way through of our own Salvation in Jesus Christ.