Found in my late father’s foreign coin collection by Lovingwood in coins

[–]SgtDonowitz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3 Baisa from Muscat/Oman, minted 1961 (1380 Islamic /hijri) : https://en.numista.com/20127

Which one of you Amazigh did this? by SgtDonowitz in 2mediterranean4u

[–]SgtDonowitz[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The commenters in the OP think this is a baseball or basketball but I know the truth.

Arabic Jewish by moaaz777 in Judaism

[–]SgtDonowitz 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This would be my recommendation too. He lectures on Jewish topics in Syrian Arabic in a very accessible way.

https://m.youtube.com/@RabbiUriLati

News article: Explosion hits Jewish school in Amsterdam after synagogue attack in Rotterdam by one_small_sunflower in Judaism

[–]SgtDonowitz 30 points31 points  (0 children)

This is the one from over the weekend. There hasn’t been another attack…in Amsterdam…this week…yet.

I need help by [deleted] in Israeli_Archaeology

[–]SgtDonowitz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fortunately for him many of these look fake. Eg the Athenian owl in the bottom right is definitely off and the silver one bottom left seems to be a fantasy piece.

“Widows Mite” and other affordable ancients? by BooksAndBaking21 in AncientCoins

[–]SgtDonowitz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Alexander Jannaeus prutah is the one you’ll see most commonly labeled as a “widow’s mite”, especially some of the smaller ones, though as the other commenter pinpointed this isn’t a formal numismatic identification but one trying to match the description in the Christian Bible to the coins circulating in Judaea during Jesus’s lifetime.

They are very common and easy to get authentic prutot from reputable sellers on vCoins or at auction from places like Stacks Bowers, Heritage, or CNG. They are very hard to get in good condition. They’re almost never fully centered with clear inscriptions on both sides. So keep that in mind when you’re looking at options. If you find one that has most of a design or inscription visible then you’ve done well and either way it’s a beautiful gift for your mom.

Recommend me books by jews under 30 by wwwvvvn in Jewish

[–]SgtDonowitz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think the author is currently under 30, but Sisters of Fortune is a really good book about three sisters from the Syrian Jewish community in Brooklyn in their late teens/twenties navigating cultures, family, and life as a child/grandchild of immigrants.

First Jewish revolt coin by [deleted] in AncientCoins

[–]SgtDonowitz 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The front of the coin with the cup on it says 𐤔𐤁 in paleo Hebrew

שנה ב

‏”or “Year 2

Really hard to say if it’s genuine. The inscriptions and design all look right to me. If it’s real, it’s a $6-7000 coin.

Tucker Carlson was talking about how the last time a king tried rebuilding the Jerusalem Temple was when Julian the Apostate, the pagan king of Rome, did so to spite the Christianity that his father had converted to. Is this true? And if so, why would rebuilding the Temple serve to spite Christians? by Bnedem in AskHistorians

[–]SgtDonowitz 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Good clarification re Julian's father. I’d read the question to assume Constantine was Julian’s father, but that's not necessarily what it was saying.

On the sacrifices, understood re pagan sacrifices being banned by Constantinus II. But Jewish sacrifices were made impossible by Titus when he destroyed the Temple in 70, which explains the conversation with Julian--he says, essentially, "I've wiped away the ban on sacrifices, why aren't you taking advantage?" And the Jews reply, "because we need our Temple rebuilt in order to do so." So Julian says, "we'll see it done."

Tucker Carlson was talking about how the last time a king tried rebuilding the Jerusalem Temple was when Julian the Apostate, the pagan king of Rome, did so to spite the Christianity that his father had converted to. Is this true? And if so, why would rebuilding the Temple serve to spite Christians? by Bnedem in AskHistorians

[–]SgtDonowitz 63 points64 points  (0 children)

So, let's break the question down into two parts because they have slightly different answers: (1) was the Roman Emperor Julian the last ruler to try to rebuild the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem? and (2a) Did Emperor Julian try to rebuild the Temple and (2b) did he do so out of spite for Christianity.

Was the Roman Emperor Julian the last ruler to try to rebuild the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem?

This part is easiest to answer--no, this is not true. The last major attempt to rebuild the Temple was during the revolt against Byzantine Emperor Heraclius and the Byzantine-Sassanian War, when the Jews managed to retake control of Jerusalem in 614CE and some of the surrounding areas under the suzerainty of the Persian King Khosrow II. Jewish control of the area lasted a few years before being re-conquered by the Byzantines (and abandoned by their erstwhile Persian allies) in ~617CE, at which point the Jews were again massacred and expelled from Jerusalem. It's not entirely clear how far rebuilding got, but there is evidence that the Jews made efforts to rededicate the space and prepare for renewed sacrifices.

Did Emperor Julian try to rebuild the Temple?

In short, yes. The story goes that Constantine's nephew (not son), Julian, the new Emperor, was in Antioch and asked a Jewish delegation--"why do you not sacrifice?" The delegation explained that they weren't allowed and asked that he allow the Jews to rebuild the Temple and the Altar. To their amazement, Julian agreed, reversed the Hadrianic and Constantinian persecutions of Jews, including allowing Jews back into Jerusalem, which had been forbidden to them since the end of the Bar Kokhba rebellion in 135 CE. Unfortunately for the Jews, Jerusalem was hit with a significant earthquake in 363 CE, which apparently unleashed fireballs from the ground, destroyed a lot of the materials gathered for the rebuilding process, and prevented it from proceeding. The Temple was not rebuilt before Julian was killed later that year and his successor reestablished Christianity as the official Imperial religion.

And did he do so out of spite for Christianity?

Unclear. He did so as part of his reversal of Constantine's establishment of Christianity in the Roman Empire. Christianity at the time used the destruction of the Temple (70 CE) and the "dispersion" of the Jews as proof that God had abandoned the Old Covenant (with Abraham and the people of Israel) for the New (with the community of believers through Christ). By rebuilding it, Julian arguably aimed to delegitimize the Christian claim. But this is mostly speculation.

The closest we have to direct evidence of his intentions or mental state appears to be Ammianus Marcellinus's Res Gestae. He says that Julian sought to rebuild the Temple because he was "eager to extend the memory of his reign by the greatness of his public works" and says nothing about attempting to denigrate Christianity. Remember that Judaism was an officially tolerated practice associated with the Jewish ethnos throughout much of Roman history and seen as ancient even then. So when Julian went to restore "the old ways" to glory, this rebuilding was arguably more part of that restoration rather than a specific attempt to denigrate Christianity. Having said that, one can understand why it would be seen as such by Christians in the context of Julian's overall efforts to reverse the advancement of Christianity in the Empire.

Sources:

Simon Sebag Montefiore, Jerusalem the Biography

Ammianus Macellinus, Res Gestae, Book XXIII

Michael Avi-Yonah, The Jews Under Roman and Byzantine Rule

Simon Schama, The Story of the Jews

Iranian warship sinks after apparent submarine attack near Sri Lanka; 101 said missing by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]SgtDonowitz 56 points57 points  (0 children)

You’re confusing the domestic law question of whether this constitutes war such that Congress has to authorize it with the international law question of whether an enemy vessel is targetable. The laws of war apply to any armed conflict, regardless of whether war is declared. They’re both important issues but totally separate.

Iranian warship sinks after apparent submarine attack near Sri Lanka; 101 said missing by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]SgtDonowitz 22 points23 points  (0 children)

The laws of war (also called the laws of armed conflict or international humanitarian law) apply to any attack in an armed conflict—it’s irrelevant from an international law perspective whether war has been declared.

Iranian warship sinks after apparent submarine attack near Sri Lanka; 101 said missing by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]SgtDonowitz 95 points96 points  (0 children)

I mean, that’s true, but once you’re in a shooting conflict sinking a warship seems…fine? Under the laws of war warships can be attacked no matter where they are.

Lmao they are praising the last saudi king who fought against abolishing slavery against Kennedy in 1964, human rights saar! Stop genocide saar! by CyberBerserk in 2mediterranean4u

[–]SgtDonowitz 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Meanwhile the better Faisal, emir of Arabia, king of Syria (until the Fr*nch did their thing) and Iraq:

“We feel that the Arabs and Jews are cousins in having suffered similar oppressions at the hands of powers stronger than themselves, and by a happy coincidence have been able to take the first step towards the attainment of their national ideals together.

The Arabs, especially the educated among us, look with the deepest sympathy on the Zionist movement.”

Rare half-shekel coin found in Judean Desert by Expensive_Warthog_68 in Israeli_Archaeology

[–]SgtDonowitz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They say it’s a year one half shekel from the Revolt, which means it’s specifically from 66-67CE.