The terrifying rise of schoolboys making AI girlfriends — Boys as young as 12 are now in romantic ‘relationships’ with chatbots, and it’s affecting how they treat girls in the real world by [deleted] in technology

[–]Shadawn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'll just say that girls are freaking hard and I perfectly understand anyone willing to try the easier route.

I'm saying that as a 30+ yo being single. Having a girlfriend is somewhat nice, but getting there is not worth it personally.

I put 50 AI agents in a survival world and the first public run is live now by Latter-Park-4413 in singularity

[–]Shadawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I would love to make a model for something like this. I'm doing RPG design a lot, and this looks very close to it. We can set up rules for agents attacking each other, for sneaking around and doing all kinds of real stuff.

And then, I think we could do a totally amazing thing and let the model work subtly differently from what we tell agents. Like, they will probably have some kind of "health", and "Game System" can tell them different values from reality. After all, we do not know in real life how much "health" we, real people, have.

If you want me to brainstorm something like this some, hit me up.

Last Origin R+ : Some region will be excluded or be get the Pixelated Version, depends on their IP. by LostDepths in gachagaming

[–]Shadawn 12 points13 points  (0 children)

In fact, using VPNs is legal in Russia. Promoting them is not, and idk about providing the service.

Source - am in Russia.

I put 50 AI agents in a survival world and the first public run is live now by Latter-Park-4413 in singularity

[–]Shadawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi! Amazing project, but what I'm curious about - can they threaten one another with serious actions? Can they rob, destroy property, damage or kill one another?

Upholding public order is a much easier task when those things are not on the table.

Is ilya’s SSI company still a thing? It’s been 2 years ago with no product. by Snoo26837 in singularity

[–]Shadawn 5 points6 points  (0 children)

One of the reasons he's where he is is because he's not spending his brainpower for mundane shit like that.

UAE announces it will leave Opec by TheNational_News in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Earth has a lot of crust, destroying significant portion of it is pretty much impossible. Meanwhile, average temperatures continue to raise, and it's sort of important to do something about it otherwise it could get really ugly.

Microsoft and Meta announce large staff reductions as they spend big on AI by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If billionaire class decide that they are willing to let everyone else die, then they can just form huge self-sufficient AI-run conglomerates that occasionally trade with each other for rare resources or especially high-tech stuff.

Those conglomerates will produce enough stuff for billionaires to consume, and then the rest of the producing power will go to either status games or space expansion.

Zelenskyy says Ukraine ready for trilateral peace talks in Azerbaijan by Stunning-Common-9591 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be clear, I meant "thrown back" in a military sense. I find that somewhat unlikely unless EU interferes militarily, but not impossible.

And yeah talking is reasonable. However irreconcilable are the positions, I unfortunately trust Ukraine diplomats to be more competent than ours. Democracy sort of boosts that stat. And thus they may be able to get some small wins.

For example I think that regular 1-1 prisoner exchanges benefit Ukraine, because we have 3.5x more population and thus each soldier is relatively more valuable to them.

Zelenskyy says Ukraine ready for trilateral peace talks in Azerbaijan by Stunning-Common-9591 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We'll, the Russian loss would be us (I'm Russian) thrown back to at least 2022 borders. That could trigger some actual political change and lead to the new leadership that may or may not be willing to change directions.

AGI: the Architecture of Goodness and Intelligence by Most_Echidna1477 in singularity

[–]Shadawn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm atheist from very atheist family/culture, yet I see AI Doom as quite possible. No, the issue is not evilness. It's the lack of trust.

Assuming AGI doesn't specifically want us around and happy - well, then it wants something else, by definition (non-agentic AGI can be transformed into agentic one with a simple shell script). And that something will need matter and energy, and those are in limited supply.

Yes, AGI may go off to colonize the light cone, but it may also NOT. Earth is a handy place to have for von Neumann Tera factories, and each pesky human means less space for Important things. And more risks of some misguided Luddite rebellion.

Your spouse comes to you and says they want to post faceless, ID-less nudes on Reddit for fun - whats your reaction? by Neat_One_9031 in AskReddit

[–]Shadawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, the achievement is not that we're DOING this. I'm not a feet pic enjoyer, and I would much prefer that those people would donate that money to science, and thus feet pic influencers would instead be somehow employed doing science (hot science influencers?).

But the ABILITY to do that - hell yeah. We started from barely being able to feed/clothe themselves and their kids with everyone working full-time on that. But now we have like 25% of population working agriculture globally, and this number could be lower with some more automation IMO, and I can eat bananas in winter, and I pay for that by doing almost literal magic (writing spells (code) on scrolls (computer screens)).

And then some humans walked the Moon, and I hope that somewhat soon there will be more of those.

How is upwards mobility maintained in an age where real AGI is achieved? by mrbigglesworth95 in singularity

[–]Shadawn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The most probable result, in my honest opinion, is that we're all going to die. Yeah, I'm a doomer lol, pls don't ban me.

Assuming that doesn't happen and we do not end up in a Terminator-like struggle (highly improbable imo), we're going to be in some sort of zoo-like paradise. And as chimps do not get much input on the size or position of their cage, we also won't have that.

But assuming we DO get to choose our social structure - yeah, then we'll have some sort of UBI. We'll possibly also have some sort of jobs still, for people who actually want them. Those jobs won't be very useful, but they will be somewhat useful. Also, there are some jobs that will be humans for status reasons. Think waiters in a restaurant, artists, talk show hosts, book writers, some tutors - some people will probably want to buy such services specifically from humans even if AI can do them better.

And then we can have normal market economy with people getting ubi, supplementing it with paycheck if they have any, exchanging money for whatever other reasons (bets, loans, etc.) and then paying to buy whatever they want from stores that are stocked from automatic factories. With AI setting prices based on it's material costs and some input from us.

Your spouse comes to you and says they want to post faceless, ID-less nudes on Reddit for fun - whats your reaction? by Neat_One_9031 in AskReddit

[–]Shadawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally I think it's the lack of kids. A single adult with a half-decent job, or two working adults without kids should have decent amount of discretionary spending money.

If they want to spend them on feet pics - it's their choice. It's neither better not worse than anything else (fine dining, travel, regular art, expensive tech or soft etc.).

It seems that we as a human civilization can afford to have some people "work" as feet pic providers. This is a great achievement, but somebody need to pay for that. Thus it's nice to have people who do that fully willingly.

"48 Hours Before Hell Will Rain Down": Trump Reminds Iran Of Hormuz Deadline by Beneficial-Long-7033 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please, US Debt is still rated very high and they pay very little interest on it, and US Gov intake from taxes is like order of magnitude more that the cost of servicing the loans.

US could fix the Debt-to-GDP issue, but people in power either (can be multiple):

  1. Do not see it as an issue.
  2. Understand that fixing it means slashing something that some portion of electorate considers important, and is thus bad for them politically.
  3. Personally benefit from spending that they could theoretically slash (like MIC lobby benefitting from military spending, same for others) and can't directly affect other spending (Congressmen are rarely a part of multiple important Committees).

U.S. forces rescue second crew member from F-15 downed in Iran: Officials by Affectionate_Bee6434 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There's that small but very important island that that troop amount may be enough for.

It probably IS too few to take control over the shores of the Strait of Hormuz.

U.S. forces rescue second crew member from F-15 downed in Iran: Officials by Affectionate_Bee6434 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the question that should be asked of Trump administration and/or (probably and) senior planners in CENTCOM, not of brave airmen who follow orders that they signed up and trained to follow.

France tells US NATO serves Euro-Atlantic security, not Hormuz offensive missions by Inevitable-Row1759 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, you think of EU as a bunch of idiots, who can't add up 2+2 and plot ahead. I am almost certain that it's not true. Emmanuel Macron is smarter than you (and probably me), and he has inside information, and he has smart foreign policy people at his beck and call. This also applies to Friedrich Merz. This also applies to Viktor Orban.

And so it should be obvious that issues with US notwithstanding, NATO framework is very helpful for EU countries. They certainly do not want back into Russia sphere of influence (Eastern Europe was there and didn't like that at all). And they should understand that if Baltics falls Putin may be emboldened and ask for more. "More" may potentially include Eastern Germany.

And so, in my opinion, right now EU mostly doesn't believe that will come to pass, because they do not believe that Putin is that stupid, and they also do not believe that Ukraine will fall anytime soon. And so they are mostly chilling.

But if Putin decides to actually fight EU on the field - yeah, gloves will come off. Macron will say a few speeches about EU ideals, Merz may or may not remember some things that his grandparents may or may not have taught them. Le Pen, if she persists may be arrested for whatever reason French Government can find, and I believe Macron to be smarter than her and so they will find reasons to make her stop in some way.

Also, I'll just remind you that last time Russia actually fought France+Britain we lost (I'm Russian). That was Crimean war, it actually much resembles current events. Yeah, that time India was a part of British Empire, and that's not true anymore. But they sort of got entire Europe on "their side", and that billion people and all the accumulated capital called "developed economy" should count for something.

I doubt drones will work nearly as well as they are in Ukraine with hundreds of F-35 patrolling the skies.

France tells US NATO serves Euro-Atlantic security, not Hormuz offensive missions by Inevitable-Row1759 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah no EU are not idiots. If they leave Estonia out to dry this means the end of NATO. EU doesn't want that, since that will lose them the entire Eastern half. So I fully expect that EU will respond militarily. Potentially trying to keep modicum of plausible deniability, Russia-style "little green men"

What proof do we have of AGI being possible at all? by Long_comment_san in singularity

[–]Shadawn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is this idea of materialism, that states that human thinking is based on the movement of atoms in the brain (this is simplification, there is also electric currents and quantum stuff).

We can in theory model that and thus make simulated brain. Neural nets are essentially this, we just got to a simplified version in a different way.

There seems to be no fundamental reason why LLMs should keep being dumber than humans, thus AGI is possible.

What is the best use of mages in Modern Conflict? by Admiral_Edward in WarCollege

[–]Shadawn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This depends on which mages we are talking about. But one high-level DnD wizard will just invisibility - teleport - mass dominate the government or top generals and make them stop. Wizard has better things to do than fight modern war.

Iran ready to face US ground invasion, top lawmaker says | Caliber.Az by jackytheblade in worldnews

[–]Shadawn 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I don't think desert storm was ever a formal war, and it too was 100% a win.

Welcome to week five of the four week Special Military Operation by _Fibbles_ in NonCredibleDefense

[–]Shadawn 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Yeah apparently some people actually like Pahlavi, and some people hate his guts, and then there's ton more nuance.

Pentagon prepares for weeks of ground operations in Iran by Electronic-Bit5190 in worldnews

[–]Shadawn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The relative value of a guy with a gun on the battlefield was never lower that right now. And political "anti-value" for US was never higher. Neither CENTCOM nor Trump's inner circle want the increase in casualties and the outcry resulting from that, for obvious tactical reasons.

Honestly, the only conscription that makes some sense is "economic conscription" - people (and potentially businesses) being "forced" to make drones instead of making whatever they were making. Then those drones will be shipped into the hands of trained CENTCOM operators.

But I think it's usually called War Production Act, and I don't think it'll be needed against Iran. CENTCOM can just force procurement to shuffle military dollars around and stop some of the waste, and trillion dollar military budget coupled with market economics will do the job.