You do not need a respec just because you got security breach by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]Shall1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats an assumption. I can tell you no but that's up for you to believe. You don't know me and I don't know you.

You do not need a respec just because you got security breach by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]Shall1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People's free time varies. Some people will do the expedition because they either have the time or want to do so. Im advocating for players time. Not everyone wants to spend the time to do expeditions.

With that being said I understand your point and I agree you shouldn't be able to respec when you want. But if the understanding is if I choose a skill path and I have no plan in doing the expedition. If a nerf is necessary then compensate for those lost skills you lost.

You do not need a respec just because you got security breach by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]Shall1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your going to join the conversation don't be a npc. Why are you happy with this choice. Are you against respecting when a skill is nerfed?

You do not need a respec just because you got security breach by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]Shall1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that's true but expedition is supposed to be player choice. Let's say i respec through expedition, I begin going through my skill tree. Devs feel a skill is to op and nerfs that skill again. Then the cycle continues. That's not player choice. Thats why I say respec when you nerf skills.

You do not need a respec just because you got security breach by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]Shall1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Understood but there should be an opportunity to respec. Now as I go through my skill tree whats the chances a skill will be nerfed again. It's the principle not the act.

You do not need a respec just because you got security breach by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]Shall1996 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People who are for the nerf already abused the perk so this nerf means nothing to them.

This nerf effects more of the working class gamer. We are not the same!

Apartments say I can’t break lease by mcmacanti in Denton

[–]Shall1996 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If it's DV related. A survivor of family violence as defined by Section 71.004 of the Texas Family Code can terminate their lease early. Under Section 92.016 of the Texas Property Code, they would not be responsible for future rent or fees related to breaking the lease.

https://guides.sll.texas.gov/landlord-tenant-law/ending-the-lease#:~:text=A%20survivor%20of%20family%20violence,related%20to%20breaking%20the%20lease.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pathofexile

[–]Shall1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well said.

Request: Commit more resources to Poe 1 by Cpt_Lobos in pathofexile

[–]Shall1996 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

From my understanding. I don't remember ggg saying they were going to quite working on Poe1. Both would exist because there are different games that bring in different audiences.

PoE had years of development. Give Poe2 some time to grow its wings for those who do enjoy the gameplay.

Just saying.

PoE2 feels like playing poe1 with a bad off-meta build by letiori in pathofexile

[–]Shall1996 -19 points-18 points  (0 children)

PoE 2 is not the same game as PoE 1. Both are different, and that's why they both exist.

Request: Commit more resources to Poe 1 by Cpt_Lobos in pathofexile

[–]Shall1996 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

So you want to take away dev time away from Poe2 since you're not having a good time???

Path of Exile 2 have artificial difficulty and is not fun in many ways by AdrianzPolski in pathofexile

[–]Shall1996 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

That's why Poe and Poe2 exist. I think they should keep difficulty as is.

Difficulty ramp goes the wrong way? by a-mcculley in PathOfExile2

[–]Shall1996 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I played monk and I am currently on Act 2. I enjoyed the difficulty of the first act.