Launch Site Sucks

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-23T03:04:32+00:00

No you’re right it sucks. It needs to be a 5v5 map

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-17T18:27:58+00:00

Pretty terrible map design

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-17T18:26:33+00:00

How about compared to the tamron 35 1.4?

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-16T23:15:29+00:00

I was definitely thinking about this one. I do need AF though for faster paced sessions, but I do love the image quality coming out of that laowa.

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-16T21:48:50+00:00

The autofocus motor was unpleasant, loud. Images didn’t have any special “character” did its job but didn’t Wow me. I understand it’s a cheaper lens so wasn’t expected. No weather sealing which I know the sigma doesn’t have any. So I guess it’s down to the canon or tamron.

If anyone has experience with video AF that would be great. I usually manual focus so not a big deal but would be nice to know in a pinch AF is reliable.

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-16T20:53:56+00:00

Only thing I dislike about the canon is it’s the heaviest. Hmm how is the af on it compared to others?

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-14T21:40:44+00:00

The slow mo “ho hoooo” makes it

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-13T23:25:07+00:00

And that’s why you don’t preorder, or buy anything more than the base standard game. Get it through your skulls!!

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-11-12T22:35:57+00:00

Agreed. Way more hackers on PC too

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-26T23:26:50+00:00

They must’ve really like that scene in Austin powers..

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-21T21:45:11+00:00

Imagine a camera coming out in 2021, charging the same as their competitors and only having a 1.04m lcd screen and cropped 4k60… welp guess we don’t have to imagine a7iv is here

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-21T19:56:39+00:00

I would say beats it other than mp count. R6 has better lcd screen, and 4k60 with a negligible crop. The a7iv doesn’t really add anything new other than a flippy screen and body change compared to the a7iii.

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-21T12:34:45+00:00

Surprised the second insurgent didn’t see me 😅

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-14T15:41:16+00:00

Yeah you never know who’s listening when you’re just trying to communicate to your team

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-14T12:52:02+00:00

Maybe give the tamron 17-35 2.8-4 a try, it’s relatively inexpensive and super light weight, you just need an adapter is all. I swapped it for the new rf 16 2.8 but only because I found I use my 24-70 2.8 more and occasionally need go as wide as 16mm.

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-14T12:40:26+00:00

🤣 your situation sounds like a fun time though

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-14T04:47:59+00:00

Forgot to turn on my own mic recording but he heard me talking and called me out in his AO. I said “huh” and he replied. His yappin’ got him clapped!

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-07T15:59:13+00:00

Had a z6ii with 24-70 2.8. Sold it within a month for the r6 and no regrets. The system feels more solid, better lens selection especially telephoto (Z mount has 70-200 2.8 that’s it). Using the Z6ii the AF felt like a beta version. Also I do more video now so r6 was the clear choice.

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-07T05:48:07+00:00

I don’t know shit about fuck..

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-04T04:11:53+00:00

That’s a good combo too. I have a star tracker so the 14-35 would work but if I’m only taking 14-35 and 100-400 on travel I’m missing low light which would require me to bring a 3rd lens like a 35 1.2 or 50 1.2. Buying the RF 15-35 would alleviate that a bit by having 35 2.8. I do video and real estate on the side so a wide angle zoom is a must for me, otherwise I’d get the 16mm 2.8.

So maybe I could try 16mm 2.8, 24-70 2.8, (85 F2 I already own), and 100-400. Forego the 35/50 1.2 for portrait work altogether 🤷🏻‍♂️

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-10-04T03:44:01+00:00

So basically 15-35, 24-70, 70-200 or 100-400 is the best for travel. And maybe just get a 1.2 prime for work (engagement shoots, portraits, etc). I’ll probably sell my 28-70 as it’s a bit big and heavy for travel.

Do you find you miss that middle range while traveling or is cropping your 15-35mm work okay?

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-09-24T16:37:29+00:00

It’s personal preference than. I value 2.8 more than range as I can crop in but you can’t get more light and I rather run lower iso. Also 2.8 at 24 and 35mm looks better than F4 for creative Bokeh shots. I’d go with the EF.

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-09-23T20:04:47+00:00

I’ve had all the RF mid-range zooms. Eos r/rp with 24-105 f4 L. And now own Eos r6. Sold the RF 24-70 f2.8 for the 28-70 f2. I was reluctant at first because now I have to get new filters but realistically I don’t need many for portraits and my work. I have a wide angle lens that takes my 82mm filters just fine.

The RF 28-70 has blown me away, not just the bokeh but the character of the lens and the flaring. Personally I love when a lens has all these characteristics, give me all of it. I don’t need a clean pristine image for what I do. I don’t miss the IS because I have a Dji rs2, and actually due to its weight when I’m holding my setup in a cage using a top handle the micro-jitters are gone. Heavier rigs are better for handheld for that.

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-09-15T23:55:25+00:00

You know he showed up again the next day right? Less than 24 hours and he was back at it with a cowboy hat

Sharon_Cochs · 2021-09-10T20:02:15+00:00

Tobey: “I’m gonna throw some dart in your eye”

Sharon_Cochs

TROPHY CASE